3.5 Retaliation and whistleblower protection

Retaliation in employment law protects workers who speak up against workplace wrongdoing. It's a crucial safeguard, ensuring employees can report issues without fear of punishment. Whistleblower laws add another layer of protection for those who expose illegal activities.

Understanding retaliation and whistleblower protections is vital for both employers and employees. These laws shape workplace dynamics, encouraging transparency and accountability while safeguarding workers' rights to voice concerns without repercussions.

Retaliation in employment law

• Retaliation occurs when an employer takes adverse action against an employee for engaging in a protected activity
• Retaliation claims are a significant portion of employment law cases and can result in substantial liability for employers
• Understanding the elements of a retaliation claim and the available remedies is crucial for both employees and employers

Definition of retaliation

Top images from around the web for Definition of retaliation

• 

  Retaliation - Free of Charge Creative Commons Chalkboard image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Employment Law View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Fair Labor Standards Act | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Retaliation - Free of Charge Creative Commons Chalkboard image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Employment Law View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Definition of retaliation

• 

  Retaliation - Free of Charge Creative Commons Chalkboard image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Employment Law View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Fair Labor Standards Act | Human Resources Management View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Retaliation - Free of Charge Creative Commons Chalkboard image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Employment Law View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Retaliation is an adverse action taken by an employer against an employee in response to the employee engaging in a protected activity
• Adverse actions can include termination, demotion, pay cuts, or other negative employment actions
• Retaliation is prohibited under various federal and state laws, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the Fair Labor Standards Act

Types of protected activities

• Protected activities include opposing unlawful discrimination or harassment, participating in an investigation or proceeding related to discrimination or harassment, and reporting violations of law
• Employees who engage in protected activities are shielded from retaliation by their employers
• Protected activities can also include taking leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act or requesting accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act

Opposition vs participation

• Opposition refers to an employee's actions in opposing unlawful discrimination or harassment, such as complaining to a supervisor or filing a grievance
• Participation refers to an employee's involvement in an investigation or proceeding related to discrimination or harassment, such as testifying in a lawsuit or assisting with an EEOC investigation
• Both opposition and participation are protected activities under anti-retaliation laws

Elements of retaliation claim

• To establish a prima facie case of retaliation, an employee must show that they engaged in a protected activity, suffered an adverse employment action, and that there is a causal connection between the two
• The burden then shifts to the employer to provide a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason for the adverse action
• If the employer provides a legitimate reason, the employee must then demonstrate that the reason is a pretext for retaliation

Materially adverse action

• A materially adverse action is one that would dissuade a reasonable employee from engaging in protected activity
• Examples of materially adverse actions include termination, demotion, pay cuts, and negative performance evaluations
• The action must be more than a trivial harm or minor annoyance to be considered materially adverse

Causal connection

• To establish a causal connection, an employee must show that the protected activity was a but-for cause of the adverse action
• Timing alone is not sufficient to establish causation, but close temporal proximity between the protected activity and adverse action can be evidence of a causal connection
• Other evidence of causation can include statements by decision-makers or disparate treatment of similarly situated employees

Whistleblower protection laws

• Whistleblower protection laws prohibit retaliation against employees who report violations of law or engage in other protected whistleblowing activities
• These laws exist at both the federal and state level and cover a wide range of industries and types of whistleblowing

Federal whistleblower statutes

• The Sarbanes-Oxley Act protects employees of publicly traded companies who report fraud or other violations of securities laws
• The False Claims Act protects employees who report fraud against the federal government
• The Occupational Safety and Health Act protects employees who report workplace safety violations
• Other federal statutes protect whistleblowers in specific industries, such as the aviation and nuclear industries

State whistleblower statutes

• Many states have their own whistleblower protection laws that provide additional protections beyond those available under federal law
• Some state laws protect employees who report any violation of law, while others are more limited in scope
• State laws may also provide different remedies or have different procedural requirements than federal law

Whistleblowing vs retaliation claims

• Whistleblowing claims are a specific type of retaliation claim that involves reporting violations of law
• Not all retaliation claims involve whistleblowing, as employees can be retaliated against for engaging in other types of protected activities
• Whistleblowing claims may be brought under specific whistleblower protection statutes, while other retaliation claims may be brought under more general anti-discrimination or anti-retaliation laws

Proving retaliation claims

• Proving a retaliation claim can be challenging, as employers often have legitimate reasons for taking adverse actions against employees
• Employees must present evidence that the protected activity was a but-for cause of the adverse action and that the employer's stated reason is a pretext

Direct vs circumstantial evidence

• Direct evidence of retaliation is rare, as employers seldom admit to retaliating against an employee
• Circumstantial evidence is more common and can include timing, disparate treatment of similarly situated employees, or statements by decision-makers
• Statistical evidence showing a pattern of retaliation can also be used to support a claim

Burden of proof

• In a retaliation case, the employee has the initial burden of establishing a prima facie case of retaliation
• The burden then shifts to the employer to provide a legitimate, non-retaliatory reason for the adverse action
• If the employer provides a legitimate reason, the burden shifts back to the employee to demonstrate that the reason is a pretext for retaliation

Pretext in retaliation cases

• Pretext is a false or misleading reason given by an employer to cover up the true retaliatory motive for an adverse action
• Evidence of pretext can include inconsistencies in the employer's stated reason, deviations from normal policies or procedures, or evidence that the stated reason is not credible
• Demonstrating pretext is crucial for an employee to prevail on a retaliation claim

Remedies for retaliation

• Remedies for retaliation can include both equitable relief and monetary damages
• The specific remedies available will depend on the statute under which the claim is brought and the jurisdiction in which the case is filed

Reinstatement and back pay

• Reinstatement is an equitable remedy that requires the employer to return the employee to their previous position or a comparable position
• Back pay is a monetary remedy that compensates the employee for lost wages and benefits from the time of the adverse action to the time of judgment
• Reinstatement and back pay are common remedies in successful retaliation cases

Compensatory and punitive damages

• Compensatory damages are intended to compensate the employee for emotional distress, reputational harm, and other non-economic losses resulting from the retaliation
• Punitive damages are intended to punish the employer for particularly egregious or malicious conduct and to deter future retaliation
• The availability and amount of compensatory and punitive damages may be limited by statute or subject to caps depending on the jurisdiction and size of the employer

Attorneys' fees and costs

• Many anti-retaliation statutes allow prevailing employees to recover their attorneys' fees and costs from the employer
• The availability of attorneys' fees can make it easier for employees to find representation and pursue retaliation claims
• Attorneys' fees can be a significant component of the overall recovery in a successful retaliation case

Preventing retaliation claims

• Employers can take proactive steps to prevent retaliation claims and minimize their liability in the event of a claim
• Implementing clear policies, providing training, and promptly investigating complaints can help create a culture of compliance and prevent retaliation

Anti-retaliation policies

• Employers should have clear, written policies prohibiting retaliation and outlining the complaint and investigation process
• Policies should define protected activities and provide examples of prohibited retaliatory conduct
• Policies should be widely disseminated to employees and consistently enforced

Training for managers and supervisors

• Managers and supervisors should receive regular training on anti-retaliation laws and the employer's policies and procedures
• Training should cover how to recognize and respond to protected activities, how to avoid engaging in retaliatory conduct, and how to handle complaints of retaliation
• Training should be documented and refreshed periodically to ensure compliance

Prompt investigation of complaints

• Employers should have a clear process for receiving and investigating complaints of retaliation
• Investigations should be prompt, thorough, and impartial, and should be conducted by trained personnel
• Employers should take appropriate corrective action in response to any findings of retaliation, including disciplining the retaliator and making the victim whole
• Employers should also follow up with the complainant to ensure that the retaliation has stopped and that there have been no further incidents