updates our beliefs about parameters using data. It combines prior knowledge with observed evidence to form a , allowing us to make informed decisions in uncertain situations.
The process involves selecting appropriate priors, calculating posteriors using , and analyzing the impact of priors. As more data is gathered, the posterior converges towards the , regardless of the initial prior.
Bayesian Inference
Prior vs posterior distributions
Top images from around the web for Prior vs posterior distributions
bayesian - Is it possible to calculate numerically the posterior distribution with a known prior ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | The Importance of Prior Sensitivity Analysis in Bayesian Statistics: Demonstrations ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Help me understand Bayesian prior and posterior distributions - Cross Validated View original
Is this image relevant?
bayesian - Is it possible to calculate numerically the posterior distribution with a known prior ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | The Importance of Prior Sensitivity Analysis in Bayesian Statistics: Demonstrations ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Prior vs posterior distributions
bayesian - Is it possible to calculate numerically the posterior distribution with a known prior ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | The Importance of Prior Sensitivity Analysis in Bayesian Statistics: Demonstrations ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Help me understand Bayesian prior and posterior distributions - Cross Validated View original
Is this image relevant?
bayesian - Is it possible to calculate numerically the posterior distribution with a known prior ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Frontiers | The Importance of Prior Sensitivity Analysis in Bayesian Statistics: Demonstrations ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
represents initial beliefs or knowledge about a parameter before observing data
Denoted as P(θ), where θ is the parameter of interest (coin bias, disease prevalence)
Based on domain knowledge, previous studies, or expert opinion
Posterior distribution represents updated beliefs or knowledge about a parameter after observing data
Denoted as P(θ∣X), where X is the observed data (coin flips, patient test results)
Combines prior distribution and using Bayes' theorem
Selection of prior distributions
Informative priors used when prior knowledge or information about the parameter is available
for parameters bounded between 0 and 1 (success probability)
for parameters with known mean and variance (average height)
Non-informative priors used when little or no prior knowledge about the parameter is available
Aim to minimize the influence of the prior on the posterior distribution
over the parameter space (any value equally likely)
, proportional to square root of Fisher information (invariant under reparameterization)
Calculation of posterior distributions
Bayes' theorem: P(θ∣X)=P(X)P(X∣θ)P(θ)
P(X∣θ) is likelihood function, probability of observing data X given parameter θ
P(X) is , normalizing constant
Steps to calculate posterior distribution:
Specify prior distribution P(θ)
Determine likelihood function P(X∣θ) based on observed data
Calculate marginal likelihood P(X) by integrating or summing over all possible values of θ
Apply Bayes' theorem to obtain posterior distribution P(θ∣X)
Impact of priors on posteriors
investigates how choice of prior distribution affects posterior distribution
Compare posterior distributions obtained using different priors (skeptical vs optimistic)
Influence of prior distribution
Strong prior with narrow distribution or high confidence can heavily influence posterior (expert opinion)
Weak prior with wide distribution or low confidence allows data to have more impact on posterior (uninformative)
As sample size increases, influence of prior diminishes (law of large numbers)
Posterior distribution converges to true parameter value, regardless of choice of prior (consistency)