5.2 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Process

The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) process is a crucial part of NEPA, ensuring federal actions are thoroughly evaluated for environmental effects. It involves different types of reviews, from detailed EISs to simpler Categorical Exclusions, depending on the potential impacts.

The EIS process follows key steps, starting with scoping and alternatives analysis, then moving to draft and final EIS preparation. Public involvement is essential throughout, allowing stakeholders to provide input and shape the final decision documented in the Record of Decision.

EIS Process Overview

Types of Environmental Reviews

Top images from around the web for Types of Environmental Reviews

• 

  Risk assessment of environmental mixture effects - RSC Advances (RSC Publishing) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence for environmental policy and management: an overview ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Process for Sustainable Mining and Mineral Management ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Risk assessment of environmental mixture effects - RSC Advances (RSC Publishing) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence for environmental policy and management: an overview ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Types of Environmental Reviews

• 

  Risk assessment of environmental mixture effects - RSC Advances (RSC Publishing) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence for environmental policy and management: an overview ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) Process for Sustainable Mining and Mineral Management ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Risk assessment of environmental mixture effects - RSC Advances (RSC Publishing) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Systematic reviews of qualitative evidence for environmental policy and management: an overview ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) evaluates significant environmental effects of proposed federal actions
• Categorical Exclusion (CE) applies to actions with no significant environmental impact, exempting them from detailed review
• Environmental Assessment (EA) determines if an action requires a full EIS or can receive a FONSI
• Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) concludes an EA when no significant impacts are identified
• Record of Decision (ROD) documents the final decision on a proposed action after completing an EIS

Key Steps in the EIS Process

• Scoping initiates public involvement and identifies key issues to be analyzed
• Alternatives analysis evaluates different ways to achieve project objectives, including the "no action" alternative
• Draft EIS preparation involves detailed environmental impact analysis
• Public comment period allows stakeholders to provide feedback on the draft EIS
• Final EIS addresses public comments and presents the agency's preferred alternative
• ROD explains the agency's decision, describes alternatives considered, and outlines mitigation commitments

EIS Content and Analysis

Scoping and Alternatives

• Scoping determines the range of actions, alternatives, and impacts to be considered in the EIS
  • Involves public participation through meetings, workshops, or written comments
  • Helps focus the EIS on significant issues and eliminate irrelevant topics
• Alternatives analysis explores different ways to meet project objectives
  • Includes the proposed action, no action alternative, and other reasonable alternatives
  • Evaluates environmental impacts, feasibility, and effectiveness of each alternative
  • Compares alternatives based on their ability to meet project goals and minimize environmental impacts

Impact Assessment and Mitigation

• Mitigation measures reduce or eliminate adverse environmental impacts
  • Can include avoiding impacts, minimizing impacts, rectifying impacts, reducing impacts over time, or compensating for impacts
  • Must be feasible and appropriate for the specific project and location
• Cumulative impacts assess combined effects of the proposed action with other past, present, and future actions
  • Considers impacts on resources, ecosystems, and human communities
  • Analyzes spatial and temporal boundaries to capture all relevant effects
• Significance threshold determines if an impact requires further analysis or mitigation
  • Based on context (society as a whole, affected region, interests, and locality) and intensity (severity of impact)
  • Considers factors such as public health and safety, unique characteristics of the area, and controversy