4.3 Confounding: definition, types, and control

Confounding in epidemiology can skew study results, making it hard to understand the true relationship between exposures and outcomes. It happens when a third variable influences both the exposure and outcome, potentially leading to incorrect conclusions about cause and effect.

Controlling for confounding is crucial for accurate research. Methods like stratification, matching, and multivariable regression help minimize its impact. Understanding confounding and how to manage it is key for interpreting epidemiological studies and making sound public health decisions.

Confounding in Epidemiology

Definition and Impact

Top images from around the web for Definition and Impact

• 

  SSPH+ | Exploring the Causality Between Body Mass Index and Sepsis: A Two-Sample Mendelian ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Ten Rules for Conducting Retrospective Pharmacoepidemiological Analyses: Example ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | phMRI: methodological considerations for mitigating potential confounding factors ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  SSPH+ | Exploring the Causality Between Body Mass Index and Sepsis: A Two-Sample Mendelian ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Ten Rules for Conducting Retrospective Pharmacoepidemiological Analyses: Example ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Definition and Impact

• 

  SSPH+ | Exploring the Causality Between Body Mass Index and Sepsis: A Two-Sample Mendelian ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Ten Rules for Conducting Retrospective Pharmacoepidemiological Analyses: Example ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | phMRI: methodological considerations for mitigating potential confounding factors ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  SSPH+ | Exploring the Causality Between Body Mass Index and Sepsis: A Two-Sample Mendelian ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Ten Rules for Conducting Retrospective Pharmacoepidemiological Analyses: Example ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Confounding occurs when a third variable, known as a confounding variable or confounder, is associated with both the exposure and the outcome, leading to a distortion of the true relationship between the exposure and the outcome
• Confounding can result in an overestimation, underestimation, or even reversal of the true association between the exposure and the outcome, making it difficult to interpret the study results accurately
• The presence of confounding can lead to spurious associations, where an observed relationship between the exposure and the outcome is not causal but is instead due to the influence of the confounding variable
• Confounding can also mask true associations, making it appear as though there is no relationship between the exposure and the outcome when, in fact, a relationship exists but is being obscured by the confounding variable
• Identifying and controlling for confounding variables is crucial in epidemiological studies to ensure the validity of the study results and to draw accurate conclusions about the relationship between the exposure and the outcome

Examples of Confounding

• Age: A study examining the association between alcohol consumption (exposure) and heart disease (outcome) may be confounded by age, as older individuals are more likely to consume alcohol and develop heart disease
• Socioeconomic status: A study investigating the relationship between air pollution (exposure) and respiratory illness (outcome) may be confounded by socioeconomic status, as individuals with lower socioeconomic status may live in areas with higher air pollution and have limited access to healthcare, leading to a higher risk of respiratory illness
• Smoking: A study assessing the association between coffee consumption (exposure) and lung cancer (outcome) may be confounded by smoking, as smokers tend to consume more coffee and have a higher risk of lung cancer

Types of Confounding Variables

Demographic Factors

• Age is a common confounding variable because it is often associated with both the exposure and the outcome, as many health conditions and exposures vary with age
• Sex can be a confounding variable when the prevalence of the exposure or the risk of the outcome differs between males and females, and sex is also associated with the other variable
• Race/ethnicity may act as a confounding variable when it is associated with both the exposure and the outcome, and the distribution of the exposure or the risk of the outcome varies across racial/ethnic groups

Socioeconomic and Lifestyle Factors

• Socioeconomic status, including factors such as income, education, and occupation, can be a confounding variable when it is associated with both the exposure and the outcome, as health outcomes and exposures often vary across socioeconomic groups
• Lifestyle factors, such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity, can be confounding variables when they are associated with both the exposure and the outcome and are not evenly distributed among the study participants

Health-Related Factors

• Comorbidities, or the presence of other health conditions, can be confounding variables when they are associated with both the exposure and the outcome and are not equally prevalent among the exposed and unexposed groups
• Medication use may act as a confounding variable when it is associated with both the exposure and the outcome, and the use of certain medications varies between the exposed and unexposed groups
• Family history of a disease can be a confounding variable when it is associated with both the exposure and the outcome, and the prevalence of a positive family history differs between the exposed and unexposed groups

Controlling Confounding

Stratification

• Stratification involves dividing the study population into subgroups (strata) based on the levels of the confounding variable and analyzing the relationship between the exposure and the outcome within each stratum separately
  • Stratification allows for the assessment of the exposure-outcome relationship within homogeneous subgroups, reducing the potential for confounding by the stratification variable
  • The Mantel-Haenszel method can be used to combine the stratum-specific estimates of the exposure-outcome relationship into an overall estimate that is adjusted for the confounding variable
• Example: In a study examining the association between alcohol consumption (exposure) and liver disease (outcome), stratification by age groups (e.g., 20-39, 40-59, 60+) can be used to control for the confounding effect of age

Matching

• Matching involves selecting study participants in the exposed and unexposed groups who are similar with respect to the confounding variable(s), ensuring that the distribution of the confounder(s) is balanced between the two groups
  • Matching can be done at the design stage of a study, such as in case-control studies, where each case is matched to one or more controls based on the confounding variable(s)
  • Matching reduces the potential for confounding by the matched variable(s) but may limit the generalizability of the study results to the matched population
• Example: In a case-control study investigating the association between a specific medication (exposure) and a rare adverse event (outcome), cases can be matched to controls based on age, sex, and other relevant confounding variables to control for their potential confounding effects

Multivariable Regression Analysis

• Multivariable regression analysis is a statistical method that allows for the simultaneous adjustment of multiple confounding variables when estimating the relationship between the exposure and the outcome
  • Regression models, such as linear regression for continuous outcomes and logistic regression for binary outcomes, can include the exposure variable and the confounding variables as predictors, yielding adjusted estimates of the exposure-outcome relationship
  • Multivariable regression analysis is a flexible method for controlling confounding, as it can handle multiple confounders simultaneously and can be used with various types of data and study designs
• Example: In a cohort study examining the relationship between physical activity (exposure) and cardiovascular disease (outcome), multivariable regression analysis can be used to adjust for potential confounders such as age, sex, smoking status, and body mass index, providing an adjusted estimate of the association between physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk

Assessing and Controlling Confounding

Identifying Confounding Variables

• To assess the presence of confounding, researchers should consider the potential confounding variables based on their knowledge of the subject matter and the existing literature, and examine the associations between these variables and both the exposure and the outcome
• Directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) can be used to visually represent the hypothesized causal relationships among the exposure, outcome, and potential confounding variables, aiding in the identification of confounders and the selection of appropriate control strategies
• Example: In a study investigating the association between a specific dietary factor (exposure) and a chronic disease (outcome), researchers can use their knowledge of the field and existing literature to identify potential confounders, such as age, sex, socioeconomic status, and other dietary and lifestyle factors

Selecting Appropriate Control Strategies

• The choice of method for controlling confounding depends on the study design, the nature of the confounding variable(s), and the available data
  • Stratification is often used when the confounding variable is categorical and has a limited number of levels, and when the sample size is sufficient to maintain adequate precision within each stratum
  • Matching is typically used in case-control studies and when the number of potential confounders is limited, as matching on too many variables can lead to difficulty in finding suitable matches and reduced statistical power
  • Multivariable regression analysis is a versatile method that can be used in various study designs and is particularly useful when there are multiple confounding variables, including both categorical and continuous variables
• Example: In a cross-sectional study examining the association between a specific occupational exposure (exposure) and a health outcome, researchers may choose to use multivariable regression analysis to control for multiple confounding variables, such as age, sex, smoking status, and other occupational exposures

Sensitivity Analyses

• Sensitivity analyses can be conducted to assess the robustness of the study results to potential unmeasured or residual confounding, by simulating the impact of hypothetical confounders on the observed exposure-outcome relationship
• Example: In a study that controlled for several measured confounders, researchers can perform sensitivity analyses to evaluate how strong an unmeasured confounder would need to be to explain away the observed association between the exposure and the outcome, providing insight into the potential impact of residual confounding on the study results