You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

and properties are crucial concepts in ergodic theory. They describe how measure-preserving systems behave over time, with mixing indicating stronger independence between sets than weak mixing. These properties help us understand the long-term behavior of dynamical systems.

Both mixing and weak mixing are stronger than , forming a hierarchy of properties. They're characterized by different rates of correlation decay and spectral properties. Understanding these distinctions is key to analyzing various dynamical systems and their long-term behavior.

Mixing and Weak Mixing Properties

Definitions and Concepts

Top images from around the web for Definitions and Concepts
Top images from around the web for Definitions and Concepts
  • Mixing describes asymptotic independence of sets under the action of measure-preserving dynamical systems
  • For measure-preserving transformation T on probability space (X, μ), mixing defined as limnμ(Tn(A)B)=μ(A)μ(B)\lim_{n\to\infty} \mu(T^{-n}(A) \cap B) = \mu(A)\mu(B) for all measurable sets A and B
  • Weak mixing uses Cesàro average of correlation function
  • Weak mixing defined as limN1Nn=1Nμ(Tn(A)B)μ(A)μ(B)=0\lim_{N\to\infty} \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n=1}^N |\mu(T^{-n}(A) \cap B) - \mu(A)\mu(B)| = 0 for all measurable sets A and B
  • Mixing implies asymptotic decorrelation between measurable sets under transformation action
  • L^2 functions often used instead of measurable sets for proofs and applications
  • Concepts extend to measure-preserving flows (continuous-time dynamical systems) with modified definitions

Advanced Concepts and Extensions

  • Koopman operator for mixing transformation has only constant functions as eigenfunctions for eigenvalue 1
  • Weak mixing systems have continuous spectral measure for Koopman operator, except possible atom at 1 for constant functions
  • Isomorphisms of measure-preserving systems preserve mixing and weak mixing properties
  • Product of two mixes if and only if both transformations mix
  • Weak mixing equates to ergodicity of product transformation T × T on product space X × X
  • Multiple mixing involves more than two sets, applied in ergodic theory and dynamical systems

Properties and Implications of Mixing

Hierarchical Relationships

  • Mixing implies weak mixing, which implies ergodicity
  • Implications are strict with systems existing that are weak mixing but not mixing, and ergodic but not weak mixing
  • Ergodicity characterized by non-existence of non-trivial invariant sets or functions
  • Mixing ensures asymptotic independence of sets, while ergodicity matches long-term average behavior to space average
  • Weak mixing acts as time-averaged version of mixing, positioned between ergodicity and mixing in strength

Spectral and Correlation Properties

  • Mixing systems exhibit purely continuous spectrum (except at 1)
  • Weak mixing systems may have continuous spectrum with atom at 1
  • Ergodic systems can possess any type of spectrum
  • Correlation decay fastest in mixing systems, followed by weak mixing systems, then ergodic systems
  • Strength of properties reflected in product behavior
    • Mixing preserved under finite products
    • Weak mixing preserved under countable products
    • Ergodicity may be lost even for products of two systems

Mixing vs Weak Mixing vs Ergodicity

Distinguishing Characteristics

  • Ergodicity represents weakest of three properties
  • Mixing systems demonstrate asymptotic independence of sets
  • Weak mixing viewed as time-averaged version of mixing
  • Spectral properties provide clear distinction between three concepts
  • Correlation decay rates differ among mixing, weak mixing, and ergodic systems
  • Product behavior varies based on strength of mixing property

Examples of Distinctions

  • Irrational rotations on circle demonstrate ergodicity without weak mixing
  • Certain rank-one transformations exhibit weak mixing without mixing
  • Bernoulli shifts (independent symbol selection based on fixed probability distribution) exemplify mixing systems
  • Gaussian systems constructed from stationary Gaussian processes create weak mixing systems without mixing property

Examples of Mixing and Weak Mixing Systems

Discrete-Time Systems

  • Baker's transformation on unit square stretches horizontally and contracts vertically, exemplifying 2D mixing system
  • (cat map on torus) provide mixing systems from smooth dynamics
  • Rank-one transformations using cutting and stacking methods generate weak mixing transformations
    • Some rank-one transformations exhibit mixing
    • Others demonstrate weak mixing without full mixing property
  • Symbolic dynamics and subshifts of finite type construct various mixing and weak mixing systems with specific properties

Continuous-Time Systems

  • Flows built under function over ergodic base transformation create continuous-time mixing and weak mixing systems
  • Gaussian systems based on stationary Gaussian processes yield weak mixing examples without mixing
  • Anosov flows on compact manifolds provide important class of mixing continuous-time systems
  • Horocycle flows on surfaces of constant negative curvature demonstrate mixing property in geometric setting
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary