Mixing and weak mixing properties are crucial concepts in ergodic theory. They describe how measure-preserving systems behave over time, with mixing indicating stronger independence between sets than weak mixing. These properties help us understand the long-term behavior of dynamical systems.
Both mixing and weak mixing are stronger than ergodicity , forming a hierarchy of properties. They're characterized by different rates of correlation decay and spectral properties. Understanding these distinctions is key to analyzing various dynamical systems and their long-term behavior.
Mixing and Weak Mixing Properties
Definitions and Concepts
Top images from around the web for Definitions and Concepts Mixing (mathematics) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Connection between properties of Dynamical and Ergodic Systems - MathOverflow View original
Is this image relevant?
Mixing (mathematics) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Connection between properties of Dynamical and Ergodic Systems - MathOverflow View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Definitions and Concepts Mixing (mathematics) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Connection between properties of Dynamical and Ergodic Systems - MathOverflow View original
Is this image relevant?
Mixing (mathematics) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Connection between properties of Dynamical and Ergodic Systems - MathOverflow View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Mixing describes asymptotic independence of sets under the action of measure-preserving dynamical systems
For measure-preserving transformation T on probability space (X, μ), mixing defined as lim n → ∞ μ ( T − n ( A ) ∩ B ) = μ ( A ) μ ( B ) \lim_{n\to\infty} \mu(T^{-n}(A) \cap B) = \mu(A)\mu(B) lim n → ∞ μ ( T − n ( A ) ∩ B ) = μ ( A ) μ ( B ) for all measurable sets A and B
Weak mixing uses Cesàro average of correlation function
Weak mixing defined as lim N → ∞ 1 N ∑ n = 1 N ∣ μ ( T − n ( A ) ∩ B ) − μ ( A ) μ ( B ) ∣ = 0 \lim_{N\to\infty} \frac{1}{N} \sum_{n=1}^N |\mu(T^{-n}(A) \cap B) - \mu(A)\mu(B)| = 0 lim N → ∞ N 1 ∑ n = 1 N ∣ μ ( T − n ( A ) ∩ B ) − μ ( A ) μ ( B ) ∣ = 0 for all measurable sets A and B
Mixing implies asymptotic decorrelation between measurable sets under transformation action
L^2 functions often used instead of measurable sets for proofs and applications
Concepts extend to measure-preserving flows (continuous-time dynamical systems) with modified definitions
Advanced Concepts and Extensions
Koopman operator for mixing transformation has only constant functions as eigenfunctions for eigenvalue 1
Weak mixing systems have continuous spectral measure for Koopman operator, except possible atom at 1 for constant functions
Isomorphisms of measure-preserving systems preserve mixing and weak mixing properties
Product of two measure-preserving transformations mixes if and only if both transformations mix
Weak mixing equates to ergodicity of product transformation T × T on product space X × X
Multiple mixing involves more than two sets, applied in ergodic theory and dynamical systems
Properties and Implications of Mixing
Hierarchical Relationships
Mixing implies weak mixing, which implies ergodicity
Implications are strict with systems existing that are weak mixing but not mixing, and ergodic but not weak mixing
Ergodicity characterized by non-existence of non-trivial invariant sets or functions
Mixing ensures asymptotic independence of sets, while ergodicity matches long-term average behavior to space average
Weak mixing acts as time-averaged version of mixing, positioned between ergodicity and mixing in strength
Spectral and Correlation Properties
Mixing systems exhibit purely continuous spectrum (except at 1)
Weak mixing systems may have continuous spectrum with atom at 1
Ergodic systems can possess any type of spectrum
Correlation decay fastest in mixing systems, followed by weak mixing systems, then ergodic systems
Strength of properties reflected in product behavior
Mixing preserved under finite products
Weak mixing preserved under countable products
Ergodicity may be lost even for products of two systems
Mixing vs Weak Mixing vs Ergodicity
Distinguishing Characteristics
Ergodicity represents weakest of three properties
Mixing systems demonstrate asymptotic independence of sets
Weak mixing viewed as time-averaged version of mixing
Spectral properties provide clear distinction between three concepts
Correlation decay rates differ among mixing, weak mixing, and ergodic systems
Product behavior varies based on strength of mixing property
Examples of Distinctions
Irrational rotations on circle demonstrate ergodicity without weak mixing
Certain rank-one transformations exhibit weak mixing without mixing
Bernoulli shifts (independent symbol selection based on fixed probability distribution) exemplify mixing systems
Gaussian systems constructed from stationary Gaussian processes create weak mixing systems without mixing property
Examples of Mixing and Weak Mixing Systems
Discrete-Time Systems
Baker's transformation on unit square stretches horizontally and contracts vertically, exemplifying 2D mixing system
Anosov diffeomorphisms (cat map on torus) provide mixing systems from smooth dynamics
Rank-one transformations using cutting and stacking methods generate weak mixing transformations
Some rank-one transformations exhibit mixing
Others demonstrate weak mixing without full mixing property
Symbolic dynamics and subshifts of finite type construct various mixing and weak mixing systems with specific properties
Continuous-Time Systems
Flows built under function over ergodic base transformation create continuous-time mixing and weak mixing systems
Gaussian systems based on stationary Gaussian processes yield weak mixing examples without mixing
Anosov flows on compact manifolds provide important class of mixing continuous-time systems
Horocycle flows on surfaces of constant negative curvature demonstrate mixing property in geometric setting