8.3 Supervision and Review Responsibilities

Supervision and review are crucial for maintaining quality and ethical standards in accounting and auditing. They ensure work meets professional standards, develop staff skills, and catch errors before reports are issued. These processes are key to upholding the integrity of financial reporting.

Effective supervision involves clear instructions, monitoring progress, and providing feedback. Reviews objectively evaluate judgments and conclusions. Both reinforce ethical conduct by modeling integrity and catching unethical behavior early. This topic ties into the chapter's focus on professional competence and due care.

Importance of Supervision and Review

Quality Control in Accounting and Auditing

Top images from around the web for Quality Control in Accounting and Auditing

• 

  Policies and procedures View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Factors Affecting the Audit Quality with the Understanding on Information Systems as the ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Policies and procedures View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Factors Affecting the Audit Quality with the Understanding on Information Systems as the ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Quality Control in Accounting and Auditing

• 

  Policies and procedures View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Factors Affecting the Audit Quality with the Understanding on Information Systems as the ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Policies and procedures View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Factors Affecting the Audit Quality with the Understanding on Information Systems as the ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Supervision and review are critical components of an effective system of quality control in accounting and auditing firms
• Quality control systems help ensure work performed meets applicable professional standards (GAAS, GAAP) and regulatory requirements (SEC, PCAOB)
• Effective quality control promotes consistency and reliability in the services provided to clients
• Quality control procedures include policies for client acceptance, engagement performance, and monitoring

Benefits of Effective Supervision

• Effective supervision helps develop the skills and competencies of staff through on-the-job training and feedback
• Ensures work is performed as directed and that conclusions reached are appropriate based on the evidence obtained
• Supervision is an ongoing process that begins with planning the engagement and continues through the completion of the work
• Supervisors can identify and address staff performance issues or training needs on a timely basis

Objectives of Engagement Reviews

• Engagement reviews, conducted by personnel not otherwise associated with the engagement, provide an objective evaluation of significant judgments made by the engagement team and conclusions reached
• Reviews help identify and correct deficiencies (errors, omissions, misstatements) before reports are issued to clients or filed with regulatory agencies
• Engagement reviews assess compliance with professional standards, regulatory requirements, and the firm's quality control policies
• Reviews enhance the credibility and reliability of the firm's work product

Reinforcing Ethical Conduct

• Supervision and review promote ethical conduct by reinforcing the firm's culture, values and behavioral standards
• Effective supervision can identify unethical behavior (misrepresentation, plagiarism, falsification of records) early, allowing it to be addressed promptly
• Reviews may detect unethical practices (conflicts of interest, insider trading, opinion shopping) that were not prevented or detected by supervision alone
• Supervisors and reviewers serve as role models and demonstrate the firm's commitment to integrity and professional ethics

Supervisor Responsibilities

Providing Clear Instructions and Guidance

• Supervisors are responsible for providing clear and complete instructions to staff regarding their assigned tasks and responsibilities
• This includes explaining the nature, timing and extent of procedures to be performed (substantive testing, control testing, analytical procedures)
• Supervisors should ensure staff understand the objectives of their assigned work and how it fits into the overall engagement
• Clear instructions help staff perform work efficiently and effectively, reducing the need for rework or additional supervision

Monitoring Progress and Providing Feedback

• Supervisors should monitor the progress of the engagement and provide timely feedback and guidance to staff
• This involves reviewing work performed, answering questions, and providing additional instruction as needed
• Supervisors should be available and approachable, encouraging staff to ask questions or seek help when needed
• Timely feedback helps staff correct errors or deficiencies before they impact the quality of the work product

Coaching and Mentoring Staff

• Effective supervisors coach and mentor staff to help them develop professional skills and advance their careers
• This may include providing on-the-job training, recommending relevant continuing education (workshops, seminars, conferences), and offering advice on navigating ethical dilemmas
• Supervisors should provide opportunities for staff to take on new challenges and responsibilities, with appropriate support and oversight
• Coaching and mentoring help staff grow professionally and contribute to the firm's success

Evaluating Performance and Providing Feedback

• Supervisors are responsible for evaluating staff performance and providing constructive feedback
• Performance evaluations should address technical competence (knowledge, skills, judgment), adherence to ethical standards (integrity, objectivity, professionalism), and alignment with the firm's values (teamwork, client service, innovation)
• Supervisors should recognize and reward high performance through promotions, compensation adjustments, or other incentives
• Constructive feedback should be specific, timely, and focused on behaviors rather than personal characteristics

Role of Review Processes

Pre-Issuance Reviews

• Pre-issuance reviews, such as engagement quality control reviews, are designed to objectively evaluate significant judgments made and conclusions reached by the engagement team before a report is issued
• These reviews can identify errors (miscalculations, misapplication of standards) or unethical practices (misrepresentation, omission of material facts) that were not detected during the performance of the work
• Pre-issuance reviews are typically performed by experienced personnel who are independent of the engagement team
• Reviewers should have the technical expertise and authority to challenge conclusions and require additional work to be performed if necessary

Post-Issuance Reviews

• Post-issuance reviews, such as internal inspections or peer reviews, assess the effectiveness of the firm's system of quality control and identify areas for improvement
• These reviews can reveal patterns of errors or unethical behavior that may not be apparent from reviewing individual engagements
• Internal inspections are conducted by the firm's own personnel and focus on compliance with the firm's quality control policies and procedures
• Peer reviews are conducted by independent reviewers from other firms and focus on compliance with professional standards and regulatory requirements

Qualifications and Authority of Reviewers

• Reviewers should have sufficient technical expertise and be independent from the engagement team to provide an objective assessment
• Technical expertise includes knowledge of relevant professional standards, industry-specific issues, and the firm's methodology
• Independence requires that reviewers have no personal or professional relationships that could bias their judgment
• Reviewers should have the authority to access relevant documentation, interview personnel, and communicate findings to appropriate parties (engagement partner, quality control leaders, firm management)

Investigating and Correcting Deficiencies

• Effective review processes include procedures for investigating potential errors or unethical practices identified during the review
• Investigation procedures may include additional testing, interviews with personnel, or consultation with technical experts
• Firms should have policies for documenting review findings, communicating them to appropriate parties (engagement team, client management, audit committee), and ensuring corrective actions are taken
• Corrective actions may include modifying the work product, performing additional procedures, or withdrawing the report
• Firms should also evaluate whether findings indicate a need for additional training, changes to quality control policies, or disciplinary action

Ethical Considerations in Supervision

Leading by Example

• Supervisors and reviewers have a responsibility to lead by example and demonstrate a commitment to ethical behavior
• They should be familiar with relevant ethical standards (AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, state board rules) and able to guide others in resolving ethical dilemmas
• Leading by example includes modeling integrity, objectivity, professionalism, and respect for others
• Supervisors and reviewers should hold themselves to the same high standards they expect of others

Maintaining Objectivity and Independence

• Supervisors and reviewers must maintain objectivity and avoid conflicts of interest that could impair their judgment
• They should not allow personal relationships (friendships, family ties) or self-interest (financial holdings, employment opportunities) to influence their evaluation of others' work
• Objectivity requires an impartial and unbiased mindset, free from favoritism or prejudice
• Independence requires avoiding situations that could create the appearance of a conflict, even if no actual conflict exists

Reporting Unethical Behavior

• Supervisors and reviewers have a duty to report unethical behavior through appropriate channels within the firm
• This includes communicating with higher levels of authority (quality control leaders, firm management, ethics committee) when those directly supervised fail to take appropriate action
• Unethical behavior that should be reported includes violations of professional standards, regulatory requirements, or the firm's policies
• Reporting should be done in a timely manner and supported by appropriate documentation

Fostering an Ethical Environment

• Supervisors and reviewers should foster an environment that encourages open communication and consultation on ethical matters
• Staff should feel comfortable raising concerns without fear of retaliation or adverse consequences
• Supervisors should be approachable and responsive to staff questions or concerns about ethical issues
• Firms should provide training and resources (ethics hotline, confidential reporting mechanisms) to support ethical decision-making

Maintaining Confidentiality

• Supervisors and reviewers should maintain confidentiality regarding client information and the work performed by others, except as required by law or professional standards
• Confidential information includes financial data, business plans, intellectual property, and personal information about clients or personnel
• Disclosure of confidential information is only permitted with client consent, legal or regulatory mandate, or to comply with professional standards (e.g., successor auditor)
• Supervisors and reviewers should also respect the privacy and confidentiality of personnel information (performance evaluations, disciplinary actions) accessed in their oversight roles