11.1 Theories of Justice and Fairness

Theories of justice and fairness shape our understanding of social equality. From utilitarianism to deontology, these ideas guide how we approach ethical dilemmas in society. They help us navigate complex issues like income inequality, healthcare access, and education policy.

Social contract theory and distributive justice approaches offer frameworks for evaluating political institutions and resource allocation. These concepts influence debates on egalitarianism, libertarianism, and prioritarianism, shaping how we address fairness in contemporary issues.

Theories of Justice

Utilitarianism and Deontology

Top images from around the web for Utilitarianism and Deontology

• 

  Business Ethics in Organizational Behavior | Organizational Behavior / Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Practical Distributism: Justice, Fairness and Taxation, Part Three View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Business Ethics in Organizational Behavior | Organizational Behavior / Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Utilitarianism and Deontology

• 

  Business Ethics in Organizational Behavior | Organizational Behavior / Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Practical Distributism: Justice, Fairness and Taxation, Part Three View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Business Ethics in Organizational Behavior | Organizational Behavior / Human Relations View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The three moral codes of behaviour | Clamor World View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Utilitarianism holds the morally right action produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people (maximizing overall utility or well-being)
• Focuses on consequences rather than the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions
• Deontology, or duty-based ethics, emphasizes the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions based on a set of moral rules or duties, regardless of consequences
  • Kant's categorical imperative states one should act only according to that maxim by which one can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law
  • Example: lying is always wrong, even if it would produce better consequences in a particular situation

Social Contract Theory

• Social contract theory posits individuals' moral and political obligations are dependent upon a contract or agreement among them to form society
• Key thinkers include Hobbes, Locke, and Rawls
  • Hobbes argued the natural state of humankind is a "war of all against all" and a strong sovereign is necessary to maintain order and security
  • Locke believed individuals have natural rights to life, liberty, and property, and the role of government is to protect these rights
  • Rawls proposed the "original position" thought experiment, in which individuals choose principles of justice behind a "veil of ignorance," ensuring impartiality and fairness
• Social contract theory provides a framework for evaluating the legitimacy of political institutions and the scope of government authority

Distributive Justice Approaches

Egalitarianism and Libertarianism

• Distributive justice concerns the fair allocation of resources, benefits, and burdens in society
• Egalitarianism holds people should be treated as equals and there should be an equal distribution of resources and opportunities
  • Strict equality may not account for individual differences in need, merit, or contribution
  • Egalitarian principles may support policies aimed at reducing income inequality (wealth redistribution, universal basic income)
• Libertarianism emphasizes individual liberty and property rights, arguing the free market should determine the distribution of resources
  • Critics argue this approach may lead to significant inequalities and fail to address systemic disadvantages
  • Libertarian principles may oppose government intervention in healthcare and education, arguing these should be left to the free market

Prioritarianism and the Capability Approach

• Prioritarianism gives priority to improving the well-being of the worse off, while still considering overall welfare
  • Strikes a balance between equality and efficiency but may face challenges in determining who the "worse off" are and how much priority they should receive
  • Prioritarian principles may justify targeted interventions to improve the well-being of the worst-off (poverty alleviation programs, affirmative action policies in education)
• The capability approach, developed by Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum, focuses on ensuring individuals have the necessary capabilities and freedoms to lead the lives they have reason to value
  • Emphasizes real freedoms and opportunities rather than solely focusing on resource distribution
  • May support policies that enhance individuals' real freedoms and opportunities (investing in public education, ensuring access to healthcare and other basic services)

Fairness and Justice

Desert, Need, and Equality of Opportunity

• Fairness is often considered a key component of justice, but the precise relationship between the two concepts is debated
• Desert-based principles argue individuals should receive benefits or burdens based on their actions, choices, or contributions
  • Determining what factors should be considered in assessing desert can be challenging
  • Example: a person who works hard and contributes more to society may be seen as deserving a higher income
• Need-based principles prioritize the allocation of resources to those who lack the basic necessities for a decent life
  • Critics argue this approach may undermine personal responsibility and incentives
  • Example: providing housing assistance to low-income families based on their need rather than their desert
• Equality of opportunity holds individuals should have the same chances to succeed based on their talents and efforts, regardless of their background or circumstances
  • Ensuring true equality of opportunity is difficult due to the impact of factors (family background, education, social connections)

Procedural Fairness

• Procedural fairness focuses on the fairness of the processes by which decisions are made and resources are allocated
• Emphasizes transparency, impartiality, and the opportunity for affected parties to be heard
• Example: ensuring that all job applicants undergo the same selection process and are evaluated based on the same criteria
• Procedural fairness is important for maintaining trust in institutions and decision-making processes

Justice in Contemporary Issues

Income Inequality and Healthcare Access

• Utilitarianism may support policies that maximize overall social welfare (progressive taxation, universal healthcare) but may also justify the sacrifice of individual rights for the greater good
• Deontological theories may emphasize the importance of respecting individual rights and autonomy (protecting property rights, ensuring informed consent in healthcare decisions)
• Egalitarian principles may support policies aimed at reducing income inequality (wealth redistribution, universal basic income) but must grapple with questions of incentives and efficiency
• Libertarian principles may oppose government intervention in healthcare, arguing it should be left to the free market, but this approach may exacerbate existing inequalities and limit access for disadvantaged groups

Education Policy

• Social contract theory can provide a framework for evaluating the legitimacy of political institutions and their role in providing education
• Egalitarian principles may support policies aimed at ensuring equal access to quality education, regardless of socioeconomic background
• Libertarian principles may argue for a more market-driven approach to education, with less government involvement
• Prioritarian principles may justify targeted interventions to improve educational outcomes for disadvantaged groups (affirmative action policies, additional resources for low-income schools)
• The capability approach may support policies that enhance individuals' real freedoms and opportunities through education (investing in public education, providing scholarships and grants)