7.1 Types of Moral Dilemmas

Moral dilemmas are tricky situations where we must choose between conflicting values or principles. They can be personal or impersonal, acute or chronic, and often involve high stakes with no clear right answer.

Analyzing moral dilemmas helps us understand ethical reasoning and decision-making. By examining different types and contexts, we can better navigate complex moral choices and consider their far-reaching consequences for individuals and society.

Defining Moral Dilemmas

Key Characteristics of Moral Dilemmas

Top images from around the web for Key Characteristics of Moral Dilemmas

• 

  Frontiers | Universality and Cultural Diversity in Moral Reasoning and Judgment View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Moral Development | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Universality and Cultural Diversity in Moral Reasoning and Judgment View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Key Characteristics of Moral Dilemmas

• 

  Frontiers | Universality and Cultural Diversity in Moral Reasoning and Judgment View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Moral Development | Introduction to Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Universality and Cultural Diversity in Moral Reasoning and Judgment View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Moral dilemmas present situations where an agent must choose between two or more courses of action, each with significant moral consequences
• Involve conflicts between two or more moral principles or values (individual rights vs. greater good)
• Characterized by complexity and lack of a clear, unambiguous solution
  • Agent must carefully consider potential consequences and make a judgment based on moral reasoning and ethical framework
• Often involve high stakes with potential for significant harm or benefit to individuals or society
• Can arise in various contexts (personal relationships, professional settings, public policy, global issues)
  • Specific context can influence moral considerations and potential resolutions

Moral Dilemma Types

Personal vs. Impersonal Moral Dilemmas

• Personal moral dilemmas involve situations where the agent has a direct, personal relationship with affected individuals
  • Often involve conflicts between loyalty, promises, or personal values and demands of impartial morality
  • Example: deciding whether to lie to protect a friend or family member
• Impersonal moral dilemmas involve situations where the agent does not have a personal relationship with affected individuals
  • Often involve conflicts between abstract moral principles or interests of different groups
  • Example: deciding how to allocate limited resources in a public policy context

Acute vs. Chronic Moral Dilemmas

• Acute moral dilemmas arise suddenly and require an immediate decision
  • Often involve emergency situations or unexpected events forcing the agent to make a rapid judgment
  • Example: deciding whether to lie to a murderer about the location of their intended victim
• Chronic moral dilemmas are ongoing situations that persist over an extended period
  • Often involve systemic issues or long-term conflicts between competing values or obligations
  • Examples: ongoing debate about morality of capital punishment or use of animals in scientific research
• Some moral dilemmas can have elements of both personal/impersonal and acute/chronic characteristics
  • Example: a public official facing a personal dilemma in the context of an impersonal policy decision, or an acute dilemma arising within a chronic situation

Ethical Implications of Moral Dilemmas

Challenges to Ethical Decision-Making

• Moral dilemmas pose significant challenges because they involve conflicts between deeply held moral principles or values
  • Resolving conflicts requires careful analysis of competing considerations and willingness to make difficult trade-offs
• Different moral theories and frameworks (utilitarianism, deontology, virtue ethics) can provide guidance but may conflict or lead to different conclusions in specific cases

Consequences and Moral Integrity

• Resolutions of moral dilemmas can have far-reaching consequences for individuals involved and society as a whole
  • Agents must consider potential harms, benefits, and precedents set for future cases
• Moral dilemmas can pose challenges to the moral integrity and character of the decision-maker
  • Agents may face personal or professional risks in making difficult decisions and struggle with feelings of guilt, regret, or moral distress
• Analysis of moral dilemmas can reveal broader issues or tensions within a society's moral framework
  • Example: debate over use of torture in interrogation raises questions about limits of individual rights and demands of national security

Context and Perspective in Moral Dilemmas

Influence of Context on Perception and Resolution

• Specific context in which a moral dilemma arises can significantly influence how it is perceived and resolved
  • Factors such as cultural norms, social roles, and institutional structures shape moral considerations and available options
• Different individuals or groups may have different perspectives on the same moral dilemma based on unique experiences, values, and social positions
  • Perspectives can lead to conflicting interpretations of relevant moral principles and appropriate course of action

Power Dynamics and Temporal/Spatial Distance

• Resolution of moral dilemmas may be influenced by power dynamics and social hierarchies
  • Those with greater power or privilege may have more influence over decision-making process or be less affected by consequences
• Temporal and spatial distance between decision-maker and those affected can shape perception of moral dilemmas
  • Agents may feel greater moral urgency or responsibility when consequences are immediate and proximate compared to remote or abstract

Striving for Impartiality and Long-Term Considerations

• Evaluation of moral dilemmas should account for diversity of perspectives and experiences while striving for impartiality and consistency in applying moral principles
  • Requires willingness to engage in dialogue and critical reflection on one's own assumptions and biases
• Resolution of moral dilemmas may require considering long-term consequences and potential for unintended or indirect effects
  • Agents should strive to make decisions that are ethically justifiable in the moment and contribute to a more just and sustainable society over time