7.4 Trade-offs between power, sample size, and effect size

Statistical power, sample size, and effect size are crucial elements in experimental design. They're interconnected, with each influencing the others. Understanding their relationship helps researchers plan studies that can reliably detect meaningful effects.

Balancing these factors is key to conducting efficient, effective research. Too small a sample may miss real effects, while too large a sample wastes resources. Researchers must consider practical constraints and the expected effect size to determine the optimal study design.

Power and Sample Size

Relationship between Power and Sample Size

Top images from around the web for Relationship between Power and Sample Size

• 

  Coral disease prevalence estimation and sampling design [PeerJ] View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  r - How to best display graphically type II (beta) error, power and sample size? - Cross Validated View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Coral disease prevalence estimation and sampling design [PeerJ] View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  r - How to best display graphically type II (beta) error, power and sample size? - Cross Validated View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Relationship between Power and Sample Size

• 

  Coral disease prevalence estimation and sampling design [PeerJ] View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  r - How to best display graphically type II (beta) error, power and sample size? - Cross Validated View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Coral disease prevalence estimation and sampling design [PeerJ] View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  r - How to best display graphically type II (beta) error, power and sample size? - Cross Validated View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Power increases as sample size increases
• Larger sample sizes provide more precise estimates and greater ability to detect significant effects
• Increasing sample size reduces sampling error and increases the likelihood of finding a statistically significant result if one exists
• Power is the probability of correctly rejecting a false null hypothesis (avoiding Type II error)
• Higher power requires larger sample sizes to detect smaller effect sizes

Effect Size and Sample Size Considerations

• Effect size is the magnitude of the difference or relationship between variables
• Smaller effect sizes require larger sample sizes to achieve adequate power
• Researchers must consider the expected effect size when determining sample size
• Cohen's d is a common measure of effect size (small: 0.2, medium: 0.5, large: 0.8)
• Larger effect sizes can be detected with smaller sample sizes while maintaining adequate power

Determining Optimal Sample Size

• Optimal sample size balances power, effect size, and resource constraints
• Power analysis is used to determine the minimum sample size needed to detect an effect of a given size with a specified level of power
• Researchers should aim for a power level of at least 0.8 (80% chance of detecting a true effect)
• Online calculators and software (G*Power) can assist in determining optimal sample size
• Optimal sample size ensures the study is adequately powered to detect meaningful effects

Overpowered and Underpowered Studies

• Overpowered studies have sample sizes larger than necessary to detect the expected effect size
  • Overpowered studies waste resources and may detect statistically significant but practically insignificant effects
  • Overpowered studies can lead to false positives and overestimation of effect sizes
• Underpowered studies have sample sizes too small to detect the expected effect size with adequate power
  • Underpowered studies have a higher risk of Type II errors (failing to reject a false null hypothesis)
  • Underpowered studies can lead to false negatives and underestimation of effect sizes
• Researchers should aim for adequately powered studies to ensure reliable and meaningful results

Practical Considerations

Cost-Benefit Analysis

• Researchers must balance the costs and benefits of increasing sample size
• Larger sample sizes require more resources (time, money, personnel)
• Incremental gains in power may not justify the additional costs beyond a certain point
• Researchers should consider the feasibility and sustainability of the study design
• Cost-benefit analysis helps determine the most efficient allocation of resources

Practical vs. Statistical Significance

• Statistical significance indicates the likelihood that the observed results are due to chance
• Practical significance refers to the real-world impact or meaningfulness of the results
• Statistically significant results may not always be practically significant
• Practically significant results may not always reach statistical significance with small sample sizes
• Researchers should interpret results in terms of both statistical and practical significance
• Effect sizes and confidence intervals provide information about practical significance

Resource Constraints and Limitations

• Researchers often face resource constraints (funding, time, access to participants)
• Limited resources may necessitate trade-offs between sample size, power, and other study design factors
• Researchers should prioritize the most important research questions and allocate resources accordingly
• Collaboration and data sharing can help overcome resource constraints and increase sample sizes
• Pilot studies can provide initial estimates of effect sizes and inform sample size calculations for larger studies