4.4 Assignment of income doctrine

The assignment of income doctrine is a crucial concept in tax law that prevents taxpayers from avoiding taxes by transferring income rights. It originated from the 1930 Supreme Court case Lucas v. Earl and applies to both earned and unearned income.

This doctrine emphasizes control and economic benefit over legal ownership when determining tax liability. It impacts various scenarios, including employment wages, intellectual property royalties, and financial winnings. Understanding its application is essential for proper tax planning and compliance.

Assignment of Income Doctrine

Fundamental Principles and Origins

Top images from around the web for Fundamental Principles and Origins

• 

  非裔美国人民权运动 - 维基百科，自由的百科全书 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Tax Incidence | Macroeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lucas v. Earl - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  非裔美国人民权运动 - 维基百科，自由的百科全书 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Tax Incidence | Macroeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Fundamental Principles and Origins

• 

  非裔美国人民权运动 - 维基百科，自由的百科全书 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Tax Incidence | Macroeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Lucas v. Earl - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  非裔美国人民权运动 - 维基百科，自由的百科全书 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Tax Incidence | Macroeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Assignment of income doctrine prevents taxpayers from avoiding taxes by transferring the right to receive income to another party
• Originated from Supreme Court case Lucas v. Earl (1930) established income taxed to the person who earns it
• Applies to both earned income (wages, salaries) and unearned income (interest, dividends)
• Focuses on who controls the earning of income rather than who ultimately receives it
• Based on principle that economic benefit of income should be taxed to person who earns or creates right to receive it
• Closely related to substance-over-form principle looks at economic reality of transaction rather than legal form
• Supports progressive tax system by preventing high-income earners from shifting income to lower tax brackets

Key Concepts and Applications

• Emphasizes control and economic benefit over legal ownership or receipt of income
• Anticipatory assignments (assigning future income) generally ineffective for tax purposes
• Timing of income vesting or accrual crucial in determining effectiveness of assignment
• Applies to various income sources (employment wages, royalties, prize winnings)
• Relevant in gift scenarios particularly when gift involves right to receive future income
• Impacts trusts and estates requiring careful consideration of control and economic benefit
• Interacts with other tax principles (constructive receipt, economic benefit doctrine)

Applying the Assignment of Income Doctrine

Employment and Contractor Scenarios

• Prevents employees from assigning wages to lower-taxed individuals or entities
• Example: Employee cannot assign salary to spouse in lower tax bracket
• Applies to independent contractors attempting to redirect income to controlled entities
• Example: Consultant cannot assign consulting fees to personal corporation to avoid self-employment tax
• Affects stock options and deferred compensation arrangements
• Example: Executive cannot assign stock option gains to family trust
• Impacts professional athletes and entertainers attempting to assign income to loan-out corporations
• Example: Actor cannot assign movie earnings to personal service corporation to reduce tax liability

Intellectual Property and Financial Winnings

• Creator of intellectual property generally taxed on income even if rights assigned to another party
• Example: Author taxed on book royalties even if publishing rights sold to company
• Applies to lottery winnings preventing winners from assigning prize to avoid taxes
• Example: Lottery winner cannot assign winnings to family members to split tax burden
• Affects gambling winnings and contest prizes
• Example: Poker player cannot assign tournament winnings to lower-taxed entity
• Impacts patent and trademark licensing fees
• Example: Inventor taxed on patent royalties even if patent rights transferred to corporation

Income from Services vs Property

Service Income Characteristics

• Focuses on who performs work that generates income
• Anticipatory assignments of future service income generally ineffective for tax purposes
• Example: Lawyer cannot assign fees from future cases to family members
• Time of vesting or accrual of right to income crucial in determining effectiveness of assignment
• Example: Bonus earned in current year but paid next year still taxed to employee who earned it
• Special considerations for multi-year service contracts and deferred compensation arrangements
• Example: Professional athlete's multi-year contract income taxed as earned, not when paid

Property Income Characteristics

• Typically assigned based on who owns or controls income-producing property
• Fruit and tree analogy tree (property) can be given away but fruit (income) taxed to owner when it ripens
• Example: Rental property owner taxed on rent income even if right to receive rent assigned to another party
• Effectiveness of assignment depends on whether property itself or merely income from it has been transferred
• Example: Gifting stock transfers future dividend income but selling stock and gifting proceeds does not
• Special rules apply to specific types of property (installment sales, certain financial instruments)
• Example: Seller in installment sale taxed on gain as payments received even if note assigned to third party

Tax Consequences of Income Assignment

Family and Entity Assignments

• Intra-family assignments scrutinized closely by IRS due to potential for tax avoidance
• Kiddie tax rules limit effectiveness of assigning investment income to minor children
• Example: Parents cannot avoid taxes by transferring large investment accounts to young children
• Assignments to spouses may have different consequences depending on joint or separate filing status
• Example: Income-splitting between spouses ineffective in community property states
• Family limited partnerships or trusts to assign income may have gift tax implications
• Example: Transferring income-producing assets to family trust may trigger gift tax
• Corporate assignments (personal service corporations) subject to special tax rules to prevent abuse
• Example: Professional corporation must pay reasonable compensation to shareholder-employees

Charitable and International Assignments

• Assignments to charitable organizations subject to specific rules may provide tax benefits if structured correctly
• Example: Donating appreciated stock to charity avoids capital gains tax and provides deduction
• International assignments of income involve complex issues related to foreign tax credits and transfer pricing
• Example: Multinational corporation must follow transfer pricing rules when assigning income between subsidiaries
• Cross-border assignments may trigger withholding tax obligations and treaty considerations
• Example: Royalty payments to foreign entity may require withholding tax unless reduced by tax treaty
• Expatriation and citizenship renunciation can affect income assignment and taxation
• Example: U.S. citizens living abroad still taxed on worldwide income unless specific exceptions apply