6.2 Vector Autoregressive (VAR) Models

Vector Autoregressive (VAR) models are powerful tools for analyzing multiple time series data. They capture dynamic relationships between variables, allowing for feedback effects and treating each variable as endogenous. VAR models are essential for understanding complex economic systems and making forecasts.

In this section, we'll cover the key concepts, assumptions, and extensions of VAR models. We'll also dive into model construction, estimation methods, result interpretation, and performance evaluation. Understanding these aspects will help you apply VAR models effectively in your forecasting projects.

Vector Autoregression Models

Concepts and Assumptions

Top images from around the web for Concepts and Assumptions

• 

  Frontiers | Clustering Vector Autoregressive Models: Capturing Qualitative Differences in Within ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Partial Directed Coherence and the Vector Autoregressive Modelling Myth and a Caveat View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Partial Directed Coherence and the Vector Autoregressive Modelling Myth and a Caveat View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Clustering Vector Autoregressive Models: Capturing Qualitative Differences in Within ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Partial Directed Coherence and the Vector Autoregressive Modelling Myth and a Caveat View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Concepts and Assumptions

• 

  Frontiers | Clustering Vector Autoregressive Models: Capturing Qualitative Differences in Within ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Partial Directed Coherence and the Vector Autoregressive Modelling Myth and a Caveat View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Partial Directed Coherence and the Vector Autoregressive Modelling Myth and a Caveat View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Clustering Vector Autoregressive Models: Capturing Qualitative Differences in Within ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Partial Directed Coherence and the Vector Autoregressive Modelling Myth and a Caveat View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Vector autoregressive (VAR) models capture the dynamic relationships among multiple variables, treating each variable as endogenous and allowing for feedback effects
• VAR models assume the variables are stationary, meaning their statistical properties (mean, variance, autocorrelation) remain constant over time
  • If variables are non-stationary, they may need to be differenced or transformed to achieve stationarity
• The optimal lag length for a VAR model is determined using information criteria such as Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) or Schwarz Bayesian Information Criterion (SBIC), balancing model fit and parsimony
• VAR models assume the error terms are serially uncorrelated and have constant variance (homoscedasticity)
  • Violations of these assumptions can lead to biased and inefficient estimates
• The stability of a VAR model is assessed by examining the eigenvalues of the companion matrix
  • If all eigenvalues lie inside the unit circle, the VAR model is stable and has a moving average representation

Extending VAR Models

• VAR models can be extended to include exogenous variables (VARX) to capture the impact of external factors on the system
• Vector error correction models (VECM) can be used to model cointegration relationships and long-run equilibrium among non-stationary variables
• Time-varying parameter VAR (TVP-VAR) models allow for dynamic changes in the coefficients over time, capturing evolving relationships and structural breaks

VAR Model Construction and Estimation

Variable Selection and Lag Order

• The choice of variables to include in a VAR model should be based on economic theory, prior knowledge, and the research question of interest
  • It is important to avoid omitted variable bias while maintaining a parsimonious model
• The estimation of VAR models requires the specification of the lag order, which determines the number of past observations included in the model
  • The lag order can be selected using information criteria (AIC, SBIC) or by testing for residual autocorrelation

Estimation Methods and Software

• VAR models are typically estimated using ordinary least squares (OLS) or maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) methods, which provide consistent and efficient estimates under the assumption of normally distributed errors
• Software packages such as EViews, R, and Stata provide built-in functions and commands for estimating VAR models
  • These packages offer options for lag selection, coefficient estimation, and diagnostic testing
• When estimating VAR models, it is crucial to ensure the sample size is sufficient relative to the number of parameters being estimated to avoid overfitting and maintain the reliability of the results

Interpreting VAR Model Results

Coefficient Interpretation and Impulse Response Functions

• The estimated coefficients of a VAR model represent the short-run dynamics among the variables, indicating how each variable responds to its own lags and the lags of other variables in the system
• Impulse response functions (IRFs) trace out the response of each variable to a one-unit shock (or innovation) in another variable, holding all other shocks constant
  • IRFs provide insights into the magnitude, direction, and persistence of the responses over time
  • Orthogonalized IRFs assume a specific ordering of the variables based on economic theory or prior knowledge, attributing the contemporaneous correlation among the shocks to the first variable in the ordering
  • Generalized IRFs do not require a specific ordering and are invariant to the ordering of the variables, providing a more robust analysis of the responses

Forecast Error Variance Decompositions

• Forecast error variance decompositions (FEVDs) measure the proportion of the forecast error variance of each variable that is attributable to shocks in itself and other variables over different forecast horizons
  • FEVDs indicate the relative importance of each variable in explaining the variability of the system
• The statistical significance of the impulse responses and variance decompositions can be assessed using confidence intervals or bootstrap methods, which account for the uncertainty in the estimated parameters
• Interpreting FEVDs requires caution, as they are sensitive to the ordering of the variables in the VAR model and may not provide a unique decomposition of the variance

Evaluating VAR Model Performance

Residual Diagnostics and Stability Tests

• Residual diagnostic tests assess the adequacy of the estimated VAR model and check for violations of the underlying assumptions
  • Residual autocorrelation tests (Ljung-Box test, Breusch-Godfrey test) check for serial correlation in the residuals
  • Residual heteroskedasticity tests (White test, ARCH-LM test) assess the constancy of the residual variance
  • Residual normality tests (Jarque-Bera test, Shapiro-Wilk test) evaluate the normality assumption of the residuals
• Stability tests, such as the inverse roots of the characteristic polynomial, ensure that the estimated VAR model is stable and stationary
  • If the model is unstable, the impulse responses and variance decompositions may be unreliable

Model Selection and Forecasting Performance

• Model selection criteria, such as the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) or Schwarz Bayesian Information Criterion (SBIC), compare the fit and parsimony of alternative VAR specifications and help choose the most appropriate model
• Out-of-sample forecasting performance can be evaluated using metrics such as mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), or mean absolute percentage error (MAPE)
  • These metrics assess the predictive accuracy of the VAR model compared to alternative models or benchmarks
• Structural break tests, such as the Chow test or Quandt-Andrews test, can detect potential parameter instability or regime shifts in the VAR model
  • If structural breaks are present, time-varying parameter or regime-switching models may be more appropriate to capture the changing dynamics