5.1 Valid and Invalid Argument Forms

Valid and invalid argument forms are crucial in logic. They help us distinguish between arguments that guarantee true conclusions and those that don't. Understanding these forms is key to evaluating reasoning and avoiding logical fallacies.

This topic builds on earlier concepts of premises and conclusions. It introduces methods for assessing argument strength, like truth tables and counterexamples. These tools are essential for analyzing complex arguments and identifying flaws in reasoning.

Argument Structure

Components of an Argument

Top images from around the web for Components of an Argument

• 

  Inductive and Deductive Reasoning | English Composition 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Logical Arguments | English Composition 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Five Parts of an Argument - EnglishComposition.Org View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Inductive and Deductive Reasoning | English Composition 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Logical Arguments | English Composition 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Components of an Argument

• 

  Inductive and Deductive Reasoning | English Composition 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Logical Arguments | English Composition 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Five Parts of an Argument - EnglishComposition.Org View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Inductive and Deductive Reasoning | English Composition 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Logical Arguments | English Composition 1 View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Premise
  • A statement or proposition used as evidence to support a conclusion in an argument
  • Premises are assumed to be true for the sake of the argument
  • An argument can have one or multiple premises (All men are mortal. Socrates is a man.)
• Conclusion
  • The main claim or assertion that an argument aims to prove or establish
  • The conclusion is supported by the premises and follows logically from them
  • Typically comes at the end of an argument (Therefore, Socrates is mortal.)

Types of Reasoning

• Deductive reasoning
  • A type of logical reasoning that draws a specific conclusion from general premises
  • If the premises are true and the argument is valid, the conclusion must be true
  • Moves from general principles to specific instances (All dogs are mammals. Buddy is a dog. Therefore, Buddy is a mammal.)
• Inductive reasoning
  • A type of logical reasoning that draws a general conclusion from specific premises or observations
  • The conclusion is probable based on the evidence, but not guaranteed to be true
  • Moves from specific instances to general principles (Every swan I've seen is white. Therefore, all swans are probably white.)

Evaluating Arguments

Assessing Argument Strength

• Validity
  • An argument is valid if the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises
  • In a valid argument, it is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false
  • Validity is concerned with the structure of the argument, not the truth of the premises (If all cats are reptiles and Fluffy is a cat, then Fluffy is a reptile.)
• Soundness
  • An argument is sound if it is valid and all its premises are true
  • Soundness takes into account both the structure of the argument and the truth of the premises
  • A sound argument guarantees the truth of the conclusion (All mammals are animals. Dogs are mammals. Therefore, dogs are animals.)

Methods for Evaluating Arguments

• Truth table method
  • A systematic approach to determine the validity of an argument by considering all possible combinations of truth values for the premises and conclusion
  • Each row in the truth table represents a different scenario or interpretation
  • If there is no row where the premises are true and the conclusion is false, the argument is valid
• Counterexample
  • An instance or scenario that shows an argument to be invalid or unsound
  • A counterexample demonstrates a situation where the premises are true, but the conclusion is false
  • Finding a counterexample proves that an argument is invalid (Premise: All birds can fly. Counterexample: Penguins are birds, but they cannot fly.)