8.2 Translating Categorical Propositions

Categorical propositions are statements about classes of objects. They come in four types: universal affirmative, universal negative, particular affirmative, and particular negative. Each type has a specific form and can be translated into symbolic logic using quantifiers and connectives.

Translating categorical propositions into symbolic logic helps us analyze their logical structure. We use universal and existential quantifiers to express "all" and "some," and connectives like conditionals to show relationships between classes. This allows for precise logical reasoning about categories.

Types of Categorical Propositions

Universal Propositions

Top images from around the web for Universal Propositions

• 

  Scientific Progress – Introduction to History and Philosophy of Science View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Contradiction - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Logical reasoning - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Scientific Progress – Introduction to History and Philosophy of Science View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Contradiction - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Universal Propositions

• 

  Scientific Progress – Introduction to History and Philosophy of Science View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Contradiction - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Logical reasoning - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Scientific Progress – Introduction to History and Philosophy of Science View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Contradiction - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Universal affirmative (A) propositions assert that a property holds for all members of a class
  • Take the form "All S are P" where S is the subject term and P is the predicate term
  • Symbolized as $(\forall x)(Sx \to Px)$ using the universal quantifier $\forall$ and conditional $\to$
  • Asserts that for every object x, if x is an S, then x is also a P
  • Example: "All cats are mammals" asserts that every individual cat has the property of being a mammal
• Universal negative (E) propositions assert that a property does not hold for any members of a class
  • Take the form "No S are P" where S is the subject term and P is the predicate term
  • Symbolized as $(\forall x)(Sx \to \neg Px)$ using the universal quantifier $\forall$, conditional $\to$, and negation $\neg$
  • Asserts that for every object x, if x is an S, then x is not a P
  • Example: "No dogs are reptiles" asserts that every individual dog lacks the property of being a reptile

Particular Propositions

• Particular affirmative (I) propositions assert that a property holds for at least one member of a class
  • Take the form "Some S are P" where S is the subject term and P is the predicate term
  • Symbolized as $(\exists x)(Sx \wedge Px)$ using the existential quantifier $\exists$ and conjunction $\wedge$
  • Asserts that there exists at least one object x such that x is both an S and a P
  • Example: "Some birds can fly" asserts that there is at least one individual bird that has the property of being able to fly
• Particular negative (O) propositions assert that a property does not hold for at least one member of a class
  • Take the form "Some S are not P" where S is the subject term and P is the predicate term
  • Symbolized as $(\exists x)(Sx \wedge \neg Px)$ using the existential quantifier $\exists$, conjunction $\wedge$, and negation $\neg$
  • Asserts that there exists at least one object x such that x is an S but not a P
  • Example: "Some animals are not mammals" asserts that there is at least one individual animal that lacks the property of being a mammal

Quantifiers and Logical Connectives

Quantifiers

• The universal quantifier $\forall$ is used to express that a property holds for all members of a domain
  • Appears at the beginning of a quantified statement and is followed by a variable (usually $x$)
  • Read as "for all" or "for every"
  • Example: $(\forall x)(Px)$ asserts that every object x in the domain has property P
• The existential quantifier $\exists$ is used to express that a property holds for at least one member of a domain
  • Appears at the beginning of a quantified statement and is followed by a variable (usually $x$)
  • Read as "there exists" or "for some"
  • Example: $(\exists x)(Px)$ asserts that there is at least one object x in the domain that has property P

Logical Connectives

• A conditional statement expresses an if-then relationship between two propositions
  • Takes the form "If P then Q" or "P implies Q" where P is the antecedent and Q is the consequent
  • Symbolized as $P \to Q$ using the conditional connective $\to$
  • Asserts that whenever P is true, Q must also be true, but says nothing about cases where P is false
  • Example: "If it is raining, then the ground is wet" asserts that in all cases where it is raining, the ground will be wet
• A biconditional statement expresses a relationship of logical equivalence between two propositions
  • Takes the form "P if and only if Q" or "P is necessary and sufficient for Q"
  • Symbolized as $P \leftrightarrow Q$ using the biconditional connective $\leftrightarrow$
  • Asserts that P and Q always have the same truth value - whenever P is true Q is true, and whenever P is false Q is false
  • Example: "A figure is a square if and only if it is a rectangle with four equal sides" asserts that being a square and being a rectangle with four equal sides are logically equivalent conditions