All Study Guides Functional Analysis Unit 10
🧐 Functional Analysis Unit 10 – Duality Theory and Reflexive SpacesDuality theory explores the relationship between a normed space and its dual, consisting of bounded linear functionals. This unit covers key concepts like weak and weak* topologies, the Hahn-Banach theorem, and reflexive spaces, which are isomorphic to their double duals.
Understanding duality is crucial for analyzing normed spaces' properties and structure. The unit delves into examples like ℓp and Lp spaces, highlighting differences between reflexive and non-reflexive spaces, and introduces problem-solving techniques for tackling related mathematical challenges.
Key Concepts and Definitions
Dual space X ∗ X^* X ∗ consists of all bounded linear functionals on a normed space X X X
Linear functional f : X → R f: X \to \mathbb{R} f : X → R or C \mathbb{C} C preserves vector space structure (f ( a x + b y ) = a f ( x ) + b f ( y ) f(ax+by) = af(x)+bf(y) f ( a x + b y ) = a f ( x ) + b f ( y ) )
Norm of a linear functional ∥ f ∥ = sup { ∣ f ( x ) ∣ : ∥ x ∥ ≤ 1 } \|f\| = \sup\{|f(x)|: \|x\| \leq 1\} ∥ f ∥ = sup { ∣ f ( x ) ∣ : ∥ x ∥ ≤ 1 } measures its "size" or "magnitude"
Weak topology on X X X generated by the family of seminorms { p f ( x ) = ∣ f ( x ) ∣ : f ∈ X ∗ } \{p_f(x) = |f(x)|: f \in X^*\} { p f ( x ) = ∣ f ( x ) ∣ : f ∈ X ∗ }
Weakest topology making all elements of X ∗ X^* X ∗ continuous
Weak* topology on X ∗ X^* X ∗ generated by the family of seminorms { p x ( f ) = ∣ f ( x ) ∣ : x ∈ X } \{p_x(f) = |f(x)|: x \in X\} { p x ( f ) = ∣ f ( x ) ∣ : x ∈ X }
Weakest topology making all evaluation functionals e x ( f ) = f ( x ) e_x(f) = f(x) e x ( f ) = f ( x ) continuous
Reflexive space X X X isomorphic to its double dual X ∗ ∗ X^{**} X ∗∗ via the canonical map J : X → X ∗ ∗ J: X \to X^{**} J : X → X ∗∗
Dual Spaces and Linear Functionals
Dual space X ∗ X^* X ∗ forms a normed vector space with the operator norm ∥ f ∥ = sup { ∥ f ( x ) ∥ : ∥ x ∥ ≤ 1 } \|f\| = \sup\{\|f(x)\|: \|x\| \leq 1\} ∥ f ∥ = sup { ∥ f ( x ) ∥ : ∥ x ∥ ≤ 1 }
Bounded linear functionals capture the notion of continuous linear maps from X X X to its scalar field
Evaluation of a linear functional f f f at a point x ∈ X x \in X x ∈ X given by f ( x ) f(x) f ( x ) , a scalar value
Hahn-Banach theorem guarantees existence of non-trivial bounded linear functionals on any normed space
Allows extension of bounded linear functionals from subspaces to the whole space
Riesz representation theorem identifies the dual of certain function spaces (L p , C [ a , b ] L^p, C[a,b] L p , C [ a , b ] ) with other function spaces
Dual of the dual space X ∗ ∗ X^{**} X ∗∗ called the double dual or bidual of X X X
Normed Spaces and Their Duals
Normed space ( X , ∥ ⋅ ∥ ) (X, \|\cdot\|) ( X , ∥ ⋅ ∥ ) a vector space X X X equipped with a norm ∥ ⋅ ∥ \|\cdot\| ∥ ⋅ ∥ satisfying positivity, homogeneity, and triangle inequality
Dual norm on X ∗ X^* X ∗ defined by ∥ f ∥ X ∗ = sup { ∣ f ( x ) ∣ : ∥ x ∥ X ≤ 1 } \|f\|_{X^*} = \sup\{|f(x)|: \|x\|_X \leq 1\} ∥ f ∥ X ∗ = sup { ∣ f ( x ) ∣ : ∥ x ∥ X ≤ 1 }
Makes X ∗ X^* X ∗ a normed space, allowing study of its topological and geometric properties
Banach space a complete normed space (Cauchy sequences converge)
Dual of a Banach space is always a Banach space
Separable normed space contains a countable dense subset (ℓ p , L p , C [ a , b ] \ell^p, L^p, C[a,b] ℓ p , L p , C [ a , b ] )
Separability not always inherited by the dual space (ℓ 1 \ell^1 ℓ 1 separable but ℓ ∞ \ell^\infty ℓ ∞ not)
Reflexive spaces (ℓ p \ell^p ℓ p for 1 < p < ∞ 1 < p < \infty 1 < p < ∞ ) have duals that are "compatible" with the original space
Non-reflexive spaces (ℓ 1 , c 0 , L 1 , C [ a , b ] \ell^1, c_0, L^1, C[a,b] ℓ 1 , c 0 , L 1 , C [ a , b ] ) exhibit more complicated dual structure
Hahn-Banach Theorem and Applications
Hahn-Banach extension theorem allows extending bounded linear functionals from a subspace to the whole space
Preserves the norm of the functional during extension
Hahn-Banach separation theorem asserts existence of separating hyperplanes between disjoint convex sets in a normed space
Fundamental tool in convex analysis and optimization
Proves existence of non-trivial continuous linear functionals on any normed space
Guarantees rich dual structure for studying the space
Allows characterizing the dual of certain function spaces (L p , C [ a , b ] L^p, C[a,b] L p , C [ a , b ] ) via Riesz representation theorems
Used in the proof of the open mapping and closed graph theorems in functional analysis
Plays a crucial role in the development of the weak and weak* topologies on normed spaces
Weak and Weak* Topologies
Weak topology on a normed space X X X generated by the family of seminorms { p f ( x ) = ∣ f ( x ) ∣ : f ∈ X ∗ } \{p_f(x) = |f(x)|: f \in X^*\} { p f ( x ) = ∣ f ( x ) ∣ : f ∈ X ∗ }
Coarsest topology making all elements of the dual space X ∗ X^* X ∗ continuous
Weak* topology on the dual space X ∗ X^* X ∗ generated by the family of seminorms { p x ( f ) = ∣ f ( x ) ∣ : x ∈ X } \{p_x(f) = |f(x)|: x \in X\} { p x ( f ) = ∣ f ( x ) ∣ : x ∈ X }
Coarsest topology making all evaluation functionals e x ( f ) = f ( x ) e_x(f) = f(x) e x ( f ) = f ( x ) continuous
Weak and weak* topologies generally coarser (fewer open sets) than the norm topology
Convergence in norm implies weak and weak* convergence, but not conversely
Banach-Alaoglu theorem states that the closed unit ball of X ∗ X^* X ∗ is compact in the weak* topology
Crucial tool for proving existence results and studying the dual space
Weak and weak* topologies play a central role in the study of reflexive spaces and their properties
Reflexive Spaces and Their Properties
Reflexive space X X X isomorphic to its double dual X ∗ ∗ X^{**} X ∗∗ via the canonical map J : X → X ∗ ∗ J: X \to X^{**} J : X → X ∗∗ defined by J ( x ) ( f ) = f ( x ) J(x)(f) = f(x) J ( x ) ( f ) = f ( x )
J J J always injective, reflexivity equivalent to J J J being surjective
Reflexive spaces enjoy many desirable properties, such as the Radon-Nikodym property and the Krein-Milman theorem
ℓ p \ell^p ℓ p spaces reflexive for 1 < p < ∞ 1 < p < \infty 1 < p < ∞ , while ℓ 1 , c 0 , L 1 , C [ a , b ] \ell^1, c_0, L^1, C[a,b] ℓ 1 , c 0 , L 1 , C [ a , b ] are non-reflexive
Non-reflexivity often due to the presence of "singular" or "pathological" elements in the dual space
Reflexivity preserved under isomorphisms, direct sums, and certain subspaces and quotients
Kakutani's theorem characterizes reflexive spaces as those whose closed unit ball is weakly compact
James' theorem states that a Banach space X X X is reflexive if and only if every continuous linear functional on X X X attains its norm
Examples and Counterexamples
ℓ p \ell^p ℓ p spaces (1 ≤ p ≤ ∞ 1 \leq p \leq \infty 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞ ) serve as fundamental examples in the study of normed spaces and their duals
ℓ p \ell^p ℓ p reflexive for 1 < p < ∞ 1 < p < \infty 1 < p < ∞ , while ℓ 1 \ell^1 ℓ 1 and ℓ ∞ \ell^\infty ℓ ∞ are non-reflexive
L p L^p L p spaces (1 ≤ p ≤ ∞ 1 \leq p \leq \infty 1 ≤ p ≤ ∞ ) of p p p -integrable functions important in analysis and probability
L p L^p L p reflexive for 1 < p < ∞ 1 < p < \infty 1 < p < ∞ , while L 1 L^1 L 1 and L ∞ L^\infty L ∞ are non-reflexive
C [ a , b ] C[a,b] C [ a , b ] , the space of continuous functions on [ a , b ] [a,b] [ a , b ] , is a non-reflexive Banach space
Its dual is the space of signed Radon measures on [ a , b ] [a,b] [ a , b ]
James' space J J J a non-reflexive Banach space isomorphic to its double dual, but not reflexive
Shows that isomorphism to the double dual does not imply reflexivity
Tsirelson's space T T T a reflexive Banach space not containing any isomorphic copy of ℓ p \ell^p ℓ p or c 0 c_0 c 0
Demonstrates the existence of "pathological" infinite-dimensional Banach spaces
Problem-Solving Techniques
Understand the problem statement and the given information, such as the normed space, its dual, or specific properties
Identify the relevant definitions, theorems, and properties that might be applicable to the problem
Examples: Hahn-Banach theorem, reflexivity, weak and weak* topologies, compactness
Break down the problem into smaller, manageable parts or steps
Prove intermediate results or lemmas that can lead to the desired conclusion
Use the properties of the specific space or its elements to simplify the problem or gain insights
Exploit the structure of ℓ p , L p , C [ a , b ] \ell^p, L^p, C[a,b] ℓ p , L p , C [ a , b ] , or other common spaces
Consider using proof techniques such as contradiction, contraposition, or induction when appropriate
Indirect proofs can be useful when dealing with non-constructive existence results
Visualize the problem geometrically, if possible, to gain intuition or guide the solution
Geometric interpretations of the Hahn-Banach theorem or the weak and weak* topologies can be helpful
Check your solution for consistency, completeness, and correctness
Verify that all assumptions are used and that the conclusion follows logically from the arguments presented