12.3 Foundations of Analysis

Real numbers are the foundation of calculus and analysis. They bridge the gap between rational and irrational numbers, creating a complete, continuous number system. This topic explores how real numbers are constructed and their properties.

The completeness and uncountability of real numbers set them apart from rational numbers. These properties enable the development of fundamental theorems in calculus, connecting differentiation and integration. We'll also look at limitations of real analysis and alternative approaches.

Constructing the Real Numbers

Dedekind Cuts

Top images from around the web for Dedekind Cuts

• 

  Number Sets View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Number Sets View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Number Sets View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Number Sets View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Dedekind Cuts

• 

  Number Sets View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Number Sets View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Number Sets View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Number Sets View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Dedekind cuts partition the rational numbers into two non-empty sets A and B, such that every element of A is less than every element of B
• Set A contains no greatest element, ensuring there are no "gaps" between the two sets
• The set of all Dedekind cuts is in one-to-one correspondence with the real numbers
  • Each cut represents a unique real number, either rational or irrational
  • Example: The cut ({x ∈ ℚ | x² < 2}, {x ∈ ℚ | x² ≥ 2}) represents the irrational number $\sqrt{2}$
• Provides a construction of the reals from the rationals, extending the number system

Cauchy Sequences

• Cauchy sequences are sequences of rational numbers that converge to a limit
  • The terms become arbitrarily close to each other as the sequence progresses
  • Formally, for every ε > 0, there exists an N such that |aₙ - aₘ| < ε for all n, m ≥ N
• The set of equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences forms a complete ordered field, isomorphic to the real numbers
  • Two Cauchy sequences are equivalent if their difference converges to zero
  • Example: The sequence (1, 1.4, 1.41, 1.414, ...) is a Cauchy sequence converging to $\sqrt{2}$
• Cauchy sequences fill in the "gaps" in the rational numbers, creating a continuous number system

Extending the Number System

• Both Dedekind cuts and Cauchy sequences extend the rational numbers to create a complete, continuous number system
  • They provide a rigorous foundation for the real numbers, which include both rational and irrational numbers
  • The constructions ensure that there are no "gaps" or "holes" in the real number line
• The real numbers form a complete ordered field, satisfying all the axioms of a field and the completeness property
  • Field axioms: closure, associativity, commutativity, identity, inverses, distributivity
  • Completeness: every non-empty subset bounded above has a least upper bound

Completeness and Uncountability of Reals

Completeness Property

• The completeness property states that every non-empty subset of real numbers that is bounded above has a least upper bound (supremum) within the real numbers
  • Formally, if S ⊆ ℝ is non-empty and bounded above, then there exists a real number M such that x ≤ M for all x ∈ S, and if y < M, then there exists an x ∈ S such that y < x
  • Example: The set {x ∈ ℝ | x² < 2} has a least upper bound of $\sqrt{2}$, which is a real number
• The Monotone Convergence Theorem proves that every monotonic, bounded sequence of real numbers converges to a real number limit
  • If (aₙ) is increasing and bounded above, then it converges to its supremum
  • If (aₙ) is decreasing and bounded below, then it converges to its infimum
• The Bolzano-Weierstrass Theorem demonstrates that every bounded sequence of real numbers has a convergent subsequence
  • This theorem is a consequence of the completeness property and is used in many proofs in real analysis

Uncountability of Reals

• Cantor's diagonal argument proves that the real numbers are uncountable
  • There is no one-to-one correspondence between the real numbers and the natural numbers
  • The proof works by assuming a countable list of real numbers and constructing a new real number that differs from each number in the list at a specific decimal place
• The uncountability of the reals implies that there are more real numbers than rational numbers, despite both sets being infinite
  • The rational numbers are countable, as they can be put into a one-to-one correspondence with the natural numbers
  • Example: The function f(m, n) = (m + n)(m + n + 1)/2 + n provides a bijection between ℚ and ℕ
• The existence of uncountable sets has significant implications in mathematics and computer science
  • It leads to the development of cardinal numbers and the study of different sizes of infinity
  • It also has consequences for the limitations of algorithms and the undecidability of certain problems

Fundamental Theorems of Calculus

Riemann Integral

• The Riemann integral defines the definite integral as the limit of Riemann sums
  • The domain is partitioned into subintervals, and the sum of the product of each subinterval's length and the function's value at a point within the subinterval is taken
  • Formally, for a function f on [a, b], the Riemann integral is $\int_a^b f(x) dx = \lim_{n \to \infty} \sum_{i=1}^n f(x_i^*) \Delta x_i$, where $x_i^*$ is a point in the i-th subinterval and $\Delta x_i$ is the length of the subinterval
• The Riemann integral provides a rigorous definition of the definite integral, based on the concept of area under a curve
  • It is a generalization of the Darboux integral, which uses upper and lower sums
  • The Riemann integral is well-defined for bounded functions on closed intervals, but has limitations for more general functions

Fundamental Theorems of Calculus

• The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 1 (FTC1) states that if f is continuous on [a, b], then the function F(x) = $\int_a^x f(t) dt$ is an antiderivative of f on [a, b]
  • This theorem connects the concept of integration with the concept of antiderivatives
  • Example: If f(x) = x², then F(x) = $\int_0^x t^2 dt = \frac{1}{3}x^3$ is an antiderivative of f
• The Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, Part 2 (FTC2) states that if f is continuous on [a, b] and F is an antiderivative of f on [a, b], then $\int_a^b f(x) dx = F(b) - F(a)$
  • This theorem provides a way to evaluate definite integrals using antiderivatives
  • Example: $\int_1^2 x^2 dx = [\frac{1}{3}x^3]_1^2 = \frac{8}{3} - \frac{1}{3} = \frac{7}{3}$
• The Mean Value Theorem for Integrals is a corollary of the Mean Value Theorem and FTC1
  • It states that for a continuous function f on [a, b], there exists a point c in (a, b) such that $\int_a^b f(x) dx = f(c)(b - a)$
  • This theorem provides a connection between the average value of a function and its integral

Connecting Differentiation and Integration

• The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus rigorously connect the concepts of differentiation and integration
  • FTC1 shows that integration can be used to find antiderivatives
  • FTC2 shows that differentiation can be used to evaluate definite integrals
• These theorems form the foundation of calculus and have numerous applications in mathematics, science, and engineering
  • They allow for the computation of areas, volumes, and other quantities using integration
  • They also provide a way to solve differential equations and model real-world phenomena
• The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus highlight the deep relationship between the two main branches of calculus: differential calculus and integral calculus
  • They demonstrate the power and elegance of the mathematical tools developed in the 17th and 18th centuries by Newton, Leibniz, and others
  • They continue to be central to the study of calculus and its applications today

Limitations of Real Analysis vs Non-Standard Analysis

Limitations of Real Analysis

• Real analysis relies on the Archimedean property, which states that for any positive real numbers x and y, there exists a natural number n such that nx > y
  • This property excludes infinitesimal and infinite numbers, which are useful in some applications
  • Example: In real analysis, there is no real number x such that 0 < x < 1/n for all natural numbers n
• Real analysis has limitations in modeling certain physical phenomena and mathematical concepts
  • Infinitesimals, which are numbers smaller than any positive real number but larger than zero, are used intuitively in physics and engineering
  • Infinite numbers, which are larger than any real number, are used in set theory and other branches of mathematics
• The rigorous foundation of real analysis, based on the completeness and Archimedean properties, can sometimes lead to cumbersome proofs and calculations
  • Techniques like epsilon-delta proofs and limit arguments can be difficult to understand and apply
  • Some results in real analysis, such as the existence of non-differentiable continuous functions, can be counterintuitive

Non-Standard Analysis

• Non-standard analysis, developed by Abraham Robinson in the 1960s, extends the real number system to include infinitesimals and infinite numbers
  • It provides a rigorous foundation for the intuitive use of infinitesimals in calculus and other fields
  • The extended number system, called the hyperreal numbers, preserves the properties of the real numbers while adding new elements
• The transfer principle in non-standard analysis allows the extension of real analysis results to the non-standard realm
  • Statements that hold for the real numbers, such as the completeness property and the Fundamental Theorems of Calculus, also hold for the hyperreal numbers
  • This enables the use of infinitesimals and infinite numbers in proofs and calculations, often simplifying the arguments
• Non-standard analysis has applications in various areas of mathematics and science
  • It can be used to simplify proofs in real analysis, such as the proof of the chain rule or the existence of solutions to differential equations
  • It has led to the development of new theories in stochastic processes, mathematical physics, and other fields
  • It provides a way to model complex systems with infinitesimal time steps, which can be more accurate than discrete approximations

Comparing the Two Approaches

• Real analysis and non-standard analysis offer different perspectives on the foundations of calculus and analysis
  • Real analysis emphasizes the completeness and Archimedean properties of the real numbers, while non-standard analysis extends the number system to include infinitesimals and infinite numbers
  • Both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice between them depends on the specific problem and context
• Non-standard analysis can be seen as a complementary tool to real analysis, rather than a replacement
  • It provides alternative methods and insights that can simplify certain proofs and calculations
  • However, it requires a deeper understanding of mathematical logic and model theory, which can be a barrier for some students and researchers
• Ultimately, the development of non-standard analysis demonstrates the ongoing evolution of mathematics and the importance of questioning and extending established theories
  • It highlights the role of creativity and intuition in mathematical discovery, as well as the need for rigorous foundations and logical consistency
  • The interplay between real analysis and non-standard analysis continues to inspire new research and applications in various fields of mathematics and science