17.4 Approaches to Foreign Policy

U.S. foreign policy is shaped by various schools of thought, from isolationism to internationalism, realism to liberalism. These perspectives influence how America engages with the world, balancing national interests with global responsibilities.

Key factors like economic and security concerns, domestic politics, and international dynamics drive U.S. foreign policy decisions. Strategies toward major powers like Russia and China involve a mix of containment, engagement, and balancing approaches to navigate complex relationships.

Schools of Thought on U.S. Foreign Policy

Classic vs contemporary foreign policy schools

Top images from around the web for Classic vs contemporary foreign policy schools

• 

  File:SLECO chart.png View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Foreign Policy: Approaches | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 5: Scientific Progress – Introduction to History and Philosophy of Science View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:SLECO chart.png View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Foreign Policy: Approaches | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Classic vs contemporary foreign policy schools

• 

  File:SLECO chart.png View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Foreign Policy: Approaches | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Chapter 5: Scientific Progress – Introduction to History and Philosophy of Science View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:SLECO chart.png View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Foreign Policy: Approaches | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Isolationism
  • Advocates for avoiding political and military alliances with other countries (pre-WWII)
  • Prioritizes domestic issues and national self-sufficiency over international involvement
• Internationalism
  • Encourages active engagement with the international community through global cooperation and multilateralism (post-WWII)
  • Recognizes the importance of U.S. involvement in world affairs
• Realism
  • Emphasizes national interest, power, and security as the primary drivers of foreign policy decisions
  • Views international relations as inherently competitive and anarchic, requiring strategic considerations over ideological or moral concerns
• Liberalism
  • Stresses the importance of international institutions, cooperation, and the promotion of democracy and human rights
  • Believes that economic interdependence and shared values can foster peace and stability
• Neoconservatism
  • Combines elements of realism and idealism, supporting the use of military force to promote U.S. interests and values abroad (early 2000s, George W. Bush administration)
  • Advocates for a more assertive and interventionist foreign policy approach

Factors Influencing U.S. Foreign Policy

Key factors in U.S. foreign policy

• National interests
  • Economic interests, such as promoting trade, investment, and access to resources (oil, rare earth minerals)
  • Security interests, including counterterrorism efforts and maintaining regional stability (Middle East, Asia-Pacific)
  • Political interests, such as advancing democracy and human rights (sanctions against authoritarian regimes)
• Domestic politics
  • Public opinion and media influence on foreign policy decisions (support for or opposition to military interventions)
  • Interest groups and lobbying efforts by various stakeholders (defense contractors, human rights organizations)
  • Partisan politics and congressional involvement in shaping foreign policy priorities (debates over international agreements, budget allocations)
• International context
  • Global power dynamics and shifting alliances among nations (rise of China, resurgence of Russia)
  • Emerging threats and challenges, such as climate change, cyber security, and global health crises (COVID-19 pandemic)
  • International organizations and multilateral agreements that shape global governance (United Nations, World Trade Organization)
• Historical experiences
  • Legacy of past conflicts and interventions influencing current foreign policy approaches (Vietnam War, Iraq War)
  • Evolving role of the U.S. as a global superpower since World War II
  • Lessons learned from successes and failures in previous foreign policy endeavors (nation-building efforts, humanitarian interventions)
• Leadership and decision-making
  • Worldviews and ideological leanings of the president and key advisors impacting foreign policy priorities
  • Institutional structures and bureaucratic processes within the executive branch shaping policy implementation (State Department, National Security Council)
  • Personality and management style of the president influencing decision-making processes and international relationships

Geopolitical Considerations

• Sovereignty
  • Respect for territorial integrity and political independence of nations
  • Challenges to sovereignty in an interconnected world (globalization)
• Diplomacy
  • Use of negotiations and dialogue to manage international relations
  • Includes both traditional state-to-state interactions and public diplomacy efforts (soft power)
• Foreign aid
  • Provision of economic, technical, or military assistance to other countries
  • Used as a tool to advance U.S. interests and promote development abroad

U.S. Foreign Policy Strategies

Strategies towards Russia and China

• Containment
  • Strategy aimed at preventing the spread of communism during the Cold War era
  • Involved forming military alliances (NATO), providing economic aid to allies, and applying diplomatic pressure
  • Primarily applied to the Soviet Union and its allies, including China, to limit their influence
• Engagement
  • Seeks to build constructive relationships through diplomacy, trade, and cultural exchange (U.S.-China trade relations)
  • Aims to encourage positive behavior and discourage aggressive actions through cooperation and dialogue
  • Employed with both Russia and China, particularly in the post-Cold War era, to promote stability and mutual benefits
• Balancing
  • Attempts to maintain a stable distribution of power and prevent any single country from becoming too dominant
  • Involves strengthening alliances (U.S.-Japan, U.S.-South Korea), building regional partnerships, and supporting key allies to counterbalance potential threats
  • Employed to manage the rise of China and resurgence of Russia in their respective regions
• Deterrence
  • Relies on the threat of retaliation to discourage aggressive behavior by adversaries
  • Includes military posturing (freedom of navigation operations), economic sanctions, and other coercive measures
  • Used to address specific challenges, such as Russian actions in Ukraine or Chinese claims in the South China Sea
• Hedging
  • Combines elements of engagement and balancing to navigate complex relationships with Russia and China
  • Maintains cooperative ties in areas of shared interest while preparing for potential future conflicts
  • Reflects the multifaceted nature of U.S. relationships with these major powers, requiring a flexible and adaptive approach