Extensive form games and game trees are powerful tools for analyzing sequential decision-making in strategic situations. They visually represent the order of moves, choices available to players, and resulting outcomes, allowing for detailed analysis of complex interactions.
Game trees map out all possible paths and outcomes in a . By breaking down the decision-making process step-by-step, they help identify optimal strategies and predict likely outcomes, connecting to the broader concepts of in sequential games.
Extensive form games: Structure and components
Key components and their roles
Top images from around the web for Key components and their roles
An is a detailed description of a sequential structure representing the players, moves, , and outcomes of a game
The key components of an extensive form game:
Players: Individuals or entities who make decisions and take actions throughout the course of the game
Decision nodes: Points in the game where players make choices
Branches: Paths emanating from decision nodes, representing available actions or strategies
Terminal nodes: Endpoints of the game tree, specifying final outcomes and payoffs
Payoffs: or value assigned by each player to the possible outcomes of the game
The structure of an extensive form game is defined by the order of the players' moves and the information available at each decision point
Representation using game trees
Extensive form games can be represented using a game tree, a directed graph illustrating the sequence of moves and outcomes
The game tree starts with an initial node, representing the first move, and branches out to subsequent nodes until it reaches the terminal nodes
Nodes are connected by directed edges, indicating the sequence of moves from one decision point to the next
Terminal nodes specify the final outcomes and payoffs for each player
Game trees for sequential games
Constructing game trees for perfect information games
To construct a game tree, begin by identifying the players and the order in which they make their moves
Each decision point is represented by a node in the game tree, with branches emanating from the node representing the available actions or strategies
The nodes are connected by directed edges, indicating the sequence of moves from one decision point to the next
Perfect information games are those in which all players have complete knowledge of the previous moves and the current state of the game at each decision point
When constructing a game tree for a :
Nodes are labeled with the player whose turn it is to move
Branches are labeled with the available actions
Terminal nodes represent possible outcomes and are labeled with corresponding payoffs for each player
Labeling and interpreting game trees
Players are typically labeled with letters or numbers (Player 1, Player 2) to distinguish their roles and decision points
Branches are labeled with the specific actions available to the player at each node (Cooperate, Defect)
Payoffs at terminal nodes are listed in the order of the players, often separated by commas or parentheses (2, 1)
The path from the initial node to a terminal node represents a complete sequence of moves and the resulting outcome
By tracing different paths through the game tree, one can analyze the possible strategies and outcomes of the game
Players, strategies, and payoffs in extensive form games
Defining players, strategies, and payoffs
Players in an extensive form game are the individuals or entities who make decisions and take actions throughout the course of the game
Each player has a set of strategies, which are complete plans of action that specify the moves they will make at each decision point, contingent on the information available to them
A player's strategy in an extensive form game must account for all possible moves by the other players and the resulting outcomes
Payoffs in an extensive form game represent the utility or value that each player assigns to the possible outcomes of the game
Payoffs are typically represented numerically and are specified at the terminal nodes of the game tree
Strategic interactions and conflicts of interest
The payoffs for each player may differ based on their preferences and objectives, leading to potential conflicts of interest and strategic interactions
Players must consider not only their own payoffs but also the potential actions and payoffs of their opponents when making decisions
The extensive form representation allows for the analysis of strategic interactions, such as:
Anticipating and responding to the moves of other players
Identifying dominant strategies or equilibrium outcomes
Evaluating the credibility of threats or promises in sequential games
By examining the payoff structure and the sequence of moves, players can make informed decisions and adapt their strategies accordingly
Simultaneous vs sequential games
Characteristics of simultaneous games
Simultaneous games are those in which players make their moves or choose their strategies at the same time, without knowledge of the other players' actions
In simultaneous games, players cannot observe or react to the moves of their opponents, and the outcome is determined by the combination of strategies chosen by all players
Examples of simultaneous games:
Prisoner's Dilemma: Two suspects must independently decide whether to confess or remain silent
Battle of the Sexes: A couple must independently choose between two entertainment options
Matching Pennies: Two players simultaneously choose heads or tails, with payoffs based on matching or mismatching choices
Characteristics of sequential games
Sequential games are those in which players make their moves in a specific order, with each player aware of the previous moves made by other players
In sequential games, players have the opportunity to observe and respond to the actions of their opponents, allowing for strategic adaptation and anticipation
Extensive form games are typically used to model and analyze sequential games, as they capture the dynamic nature of the decision-making process and the flow of information
Examples of sequential games:
Ultimatum Game: One player proposes a division of a resource, and the other player must accept or reject the proposal
Stackelberg Competition: A leader firm makes a decision, followed by a follower firm's decision based on the leader's action
Centipede Game: Players alternately choose whether to continue or stop, with payoffs increasing as the game progresses
Distinguishing between simultaneous and sequential games
The key distinction between simultaneous and sequential games lies in the timing of moves and the information available to players when making their decisions
In simultaneous games, players act independently without knowing the actions of others, while in sequential games, players make decisions based on the observed actions of previous players
The choice between modeling a situation as a simultaneous or sequential game depends on the nature of the strategic interaction and the availability of information
Simultaneous games are often analyzed using normal form representations (payoff matrices), while sequential games are more commonly represented using extensive form games and game trees