9.3 Role of non-state actors in global governance: NGOs and civil society

Non-state actors are shaking up global governance. From NGOs to corporations, these groups challenge the old state-centric model. They're filling gaps where governments fall short, especially in human rights and environmental protection.

NGOs and civil society groups are key players in this shift. They bring specialized knowledge, grassroots connections, and advocacy skills to the table. Their influence has grown since the Cold War, thanks to globalization and new communication tech.

Non-state actors in global governance

Concept and characteristics

Top images from around the web for Concept and characteristics

• 

  Interest Groups, NGOs or Civil Society Organisations? The Framing of Non-State Actors in the EU ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cover Image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  New alliances in global environmental governance: how intergovernmental treaty secretariats ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Interest Groups, NGOs or Civil Society Organisations? The Framing of Non-State Actors in the EU ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cover Image View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Concept and characteristics

• 

  Interest Groups, NGOs or Civil Society Organisations? The Framing of Non-State Actors in the EU ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cover Image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  New alliances in global environmental governance: how intergovernmental treaty secretariats ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Interest Groups, NGOs or Civil Society Organisations? The Framing of Non-State Actors in the EU ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cover Image View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Non-state actors operate independently of national governments while exerting significant influence in international affairs and global governance
• Challenge traditional state-centric model of international relations by recognizing pluralistic nature of global governance
• Include diverse entities (multinational corporations, NGOs, civil society groups, terrorist organizations, transnational social movements)
• Participate in global governance through policy influence, public opinion shaping, and international agreement implementation
• Fill governance gaps where states are unable or unwilling to act (human rights, environmental protection, humanitarian assistance)
• Expanded role since end of Cold War facilitated by globalization and communication technology advancements

Historical context and evolution

• Post-Cold War era marked significant increase in non-state actor influence
• Globalization processes enhanced interconnectedness and reduced state monopoly on international affairs
• Communication technology advancements (internet, social media) enabled greater coordination and outreach
• Shift from purely state-centric governance models to more complex, multi-stakeholder approaches
• Growing recognition of non-state actors in formal international processes (UN conferences, treaty negotiations)

Types and examples of non-state actors

• Multinational corporations (ExxonMobil, Apple, Nestlé)
  • Influence through economic power and lobbying
  • Shape global trade and investment policies
• Non-governmental organizations (Amnesty International, Greenpeace, Oxfam)
  • Advocate for specific causes and provide expertise
  • Influence public opinion and policy decisions
• Civil society groups (labor unions, professional associations, faith-based organizations)
  • Represent diverse societal interests
  • Engage in grassroots mobilization and advocacy
• Terrorist organizations (Al-Qaeda, ISIS)
  • Challenge state authority and security
  • Influence global security policies and counterterrorism efforts
• Transnational social movements (global climate movement, women's rights movement)
  • Mobilize across borders for common causes
  • Shape global norms and values

NGOs and civil society influence

Sources of influence

• Provide specialized knowledge and research to complement or challenge state perspectives
• Offer grassroots connections and on-the-ground expertise in various policy areas
• Serve as important sources of advocacy, shaping public opinion and policy agendas
• Engage in various channels of influence (lobbying, media campaigns, protest movements, international conference participation)
• Concept of "global civil society" emerged to describe transnational networks of NGOs and social movements
• Particularly influential in human rights, environmental protection, and global health
  • Often push for more progressive policies than states
  • Examples: Médecins Sans Frontières in global health crises, Greenpeace in environmental negotiations

Factors affecting influence

• Resources available to NGOs and civil society groups
  • Financial capacity determines scope of activities and campaigns
  • Human resources and expertise enhance credibility and impact
• Reputation and credibility within international community
  • Track record of successful interventions and accurate information
  • Relationships with key decision-makers and institutions
• Ability to form coalitions and networks
  • Strength in numbers and diverse expertise
  • Example: International Campaign to Ban Landmines united hundreds of NGOs
• Media savvy and communication strategies
  • Effective use of traditional and social media platforms
  • Ability to frame issues and narratives compellingly
• Political opportunity structures
  • Openness of international institutions to civil society participation
  • Alignment with priorities of powerful state actors

Critiques and limitations

• Questions about representativeness and accountability to broader populations
• Potential for NGO-ization (professionalization and bureaucratization disconnecting from grassroots)
• North-South power imbalances within global civil society
• Dependency on donor funding potentially compromising independence
• Limited enforcement capacity compared to state actors

Strategies of non-state actors

Information and framing strategies

• Agenda-setting shapes priorities in global governance discussions
  • Example: Global AIDS activism putting the issue on the UN Security Council agenda
• Strategic use of information and expertise to influence policy debates (information politics)
  • Providing research reports, policy briefs, and expert testimony
  • Example: IPCC reports influencing climate change negotiations
• Issue framing to resonate with target audiences and decision-makers
  • Linking issues to broader values or priorities
  • Example: Framing climate change as a security issue to engage military establishments

Mobilization and advocacy tactics

• Symbolic politics utilizes powerful imagery and narratives
  • Generates emotional responses from public and policymakers
  • Example: Images of oil-covered birds during environmental campaigns
• Leverage politics applies material or moral pressure on powerful actors
  • Links issues to other policy priorities or values
  • Example: Human rights groups leveraging trade agreements for labor standards
• Accountability politics holds actors responsible for commitments
  • Monitors compliance with international agreements
  • Example: Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index

Networking and coalition-building

• Transnational advocacy networks amplify influence across borders
  • Sharing resources, information, and strategies
  • Example: International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN)
• Coalition-building among diverse actors increases bargaining power
  • Bringing together NGOs, academics, and sympathetic state actors
  • Example: Coalition for the International Criminal Court
• Engagement with formal international organizations
  • Participating in UN conferences and treaty negotiations
  • Obtaining consultative status with ECOSOC or other bodies

Digital and media strategies

• Utilization of digital technologies and social media for outreach
  • Mobilizing support and disseminating information rapidly
  • Example: #BringBackOurGirls campaign for Nigerian schoolgirls
• Creation of alternative media platforms and citizen journalism
  • Bypassing traditional gatekeepers to share perspectives
  • Example: IndyMedia network for grassroots reporting
• Online petitions and digital advocacy campaigns
  • Generating mass support for policy changes
  • Example: Avaaz.org's global campaigns on various issues

Legitimacy and accountability of non-state actors

Assessing legitimacy

• Expertise-based legitimacy derived from specialized knowledge
  • Technical expertise in specific policy areas
  • Example: World Wildlife Fund's scientific research on biodiversity
• Moral authority based on principled positions and track record
  • Consistency in advocating for values and norms
  • Example: Amnesty International's reputation in human rights advocacy
• Representativeness and grassroots connections
  • Genuine engagement with affected communities
  • Example: La Via Campesina representing small-scale farmers globally
• Transparency in decision-making processes and funding sources
  • Open disclosure of governance structures and financial information
  • Example: Transparency International's own transparency reports

Accountability challenges

• Democratic deficit in some NGO and civil society structures
  • Lack of formal mechanisms for constituency input
  • Example: Critiques of large international NGOs' decision-making processes
• NGO-ization phenomenon disconnecting from grassroots
  • Professionalization leading to bureaucratic structures
  • Example: Debates within environmental movement about grassroots vs. professional approaches
• Funding dependencies potentially compromising independence
  • Influence of government or corporate donors on agendas
  • Example: Controversies over NGO funding in global health initiatives
• Limited mechanisms for external oversight
  • Absence of formal accountability structures like those for states
  • Example: Debates over NGO accountability in humanitarian interventions

Enhancing accountability and legitimacy

• Self-regulation mechanisms within civil society sector
  • Voluntary codes of conduct and best practices
  • Example: INGO Accountability Charter
• Transparency initiatives to increase public scrutiny
  • Publishing detailed financial and programmatic information
  • Example: GuideStar's NGO transparency ratings
• Stakeholder engagement and participatory approaches
  • Involving affected communities in decision-making processes
  • Example: ActionAid's ALPS (Accountability, Learning and Planning System)
• External evaluation and impact assessment
  • Independent audits and effectiveness studies
  • Example: 3ie (International Initiative for Impact Evaluation) for development NGOs
• Concept of "stakeholder democracy" for inclusive global governance
  • Formalizing roles for diverse non-state actors in decision-making
  • Example: Multi-stakeholder initiatives like the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative