Magnetic confinement is a cornerstone of fusion research, using powerful magnetic fields to trap and control hot plasma. This approach aims to achieve the extreme conditions needed for fusion reactions while keeping the plasma isolated from reactor walls.
Various magnetic configurations are explored, from the donut-shaped tokamak to the twisty stellarator . Each design grapples with challenges like particle confinement, plasma stability, and efficient heating methods to push fusion technology forward.
Principles of magnetic confinement
Magnetic confinement forms the foundation of controlled fusion research in High Energy Density Physics
Utilizes strong magnetic fields to confine and isolate hot plasma from reactor walls
Aims to achieve fusion conditions by maintaining high temperature and density for sufficient duration
Magnetic field configurations
Top images from around the web for Magnetic field configurations Toroidale-Poloidale Zerlegung – Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
12.6 Solenoids and Toroids – University Physics Volume 2 View original
Is this image relevant?
Toroidale-Poloidale Zerlegung – Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
12.6 Solenoids and Toroids – University Physics Volume 2 View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Magnetic field configurations Toroidale-Poloidale Zerlegung – Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
12.6 Solenoids and Toroids – University Physics Volume 2 View original
Is this image relevant?
Toroidale-Poloidale Zerlegung – Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
12.6 Solenoids and Toroids – University Physics Volume 2 View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Toroidal configurations wrap magnetic field lines around a donut-shaped chamber
Poloidal fields provide additional plasma shaping and stability
Closed magnetic field lines trap charged particles within the confinement region
Open-ended configurations (magnetic mirrors) use magnetic field strength gradients
Particle motion in fields
Charged particles follow helical paths along magnetic field lines due to Lorentz force
Gyration radius depends on particle mass, charge, velocity, and magnetic field strength
Drift motions (gradient drift, curvature drift) cause slow particle movement across field lines
Trapped particle orbits (banana orbits) occur in inhomogeneous magnetic fields
Plasma equilibrium conditions
Force balance between plasma pressure and magnetic field pressure (∇ p = j × B \nabla p = \mathbf{j} \times \mathbf{B} ∇ p = j × B )
Magnetic field line curvature compensates for plasma expansion forces
Vertical field component provides radial force balance in toroidal systems
Plasma beta (ratio of plasma pressure to magnetic pressure) indicates confinement efficiency
Tokamak design
Tokamaks represent the most advanced magnetic confinement concept in fusion research
Combines toroidal and poloidal magnetic fields to create a helical field structure
Relies on plasma current for confinement and heating, presenting unique engineering challenges
Toroidal field coils
Large D-shaped coils generate strong toroidal magnetic field
Superconducting materials (NbTi, Nb3Sn) enable high-field operation in modern tokamaks
Field strength varies as 1/R, creating field gradients and particle drifts
Ripple effects between coils can impact confinement quality
Poloidal field system
Central solenoid induces plasma current through transformer action
Vertical field coils provide radial equilibrium and plasma positioning
Shaping coils create elongated and triangular plasma cross-sections
Feedback-controlled coils maintain plasma stability during operation
Plasma shaping techniques
Elongation increases plasma volume and stability limits
Triangularity improves MHD stability and confinement
Divertor configuration creates magnetic null points for impurity control
X-point and double-null divertor geometries optimize power handling
Stellarator concept
Stellarators use complex 3D magnetic fields to confine plasma without relying on plasma current
Addresses some inherent limitations of tokamaks, such as disruptions and current drive requirements
Presents unique engineering challenges due to intricate coil designs
Non-axisymmetric field design
Helical magnetic field structure created by external coils alone
Rotational transform provided by carefully shaped non-planar coils
Quasi-symmetry concepts (quasi-helical, quasi-axisymmetric) optimize particle orbits
Island divertor configurations for heat and particle exhaust
Modular coil designs balance engineering feasibility with physics optimization
Advanced optimization techniques (NESCOIL, ONSET) minimize error fields
Trade-off between coil complexity and plasma performance (confinement, stability)
Fabrication challenges include tight tolerances and complex winding support structures
Advantages over tokamaks
Steady-state operation without need for current drive
Absence of current-driven instabilities and disruptions
Potential for higher beta limits due to 3D shaping
Flexibility in magnetic configuration allows optimization for different physics regimes
Magnetic mirrors
Linear confinement concept utilizing magnetic field strength gradients
Simple geometry allows for easy plasma access and diagnostic implementation
Historically important in fusion research, but limited by end losses
Basic mirror configuration
Axial magnetic field increases in strength towards both ends of a linear device
Charged particles reflect between high-field regions due to magnetic moment conservation
Confinement time depends on collision frequency and mirror ratio
Simple mirror ratio: R = Bmax / Bmin
Loss cone problem
Particles with velocity vectors inside the loss cone escape confinement
Loss cone angle: θ = arcsin(1/√R)
Velocity-space diffusion continuously populates the loss cone
Severely limits achievable fusion triple product (nTτ)
Tandem mirror improvements
Electrostatic plugging using end cell potentials reduces end losses
Thermal barriers created by local magnetic wells improve ion confinement
Ambipolar potential formation enhances electron confinement
Advanced concepts (GAMMA 10, GDT) explore alternative mirror configurations
Reversed field pinch
Toroidal confinement concept with self-organized magnetic field structure
Operates at high plasma current and low external magnetic field
Potential for compact, high-beta fusion reactor designs
Field reversal mechanism
Strong plasma current generates poloidal field exceeding external toroidal field
Reversal of toroidal field near the plasma edge occurs spontaneously
Taylor relaxation theory explains self-organization to minimum energy state
Field reversal parameter F = Bt(a) / characterizes configuration
Dynamo effect in RFPs
Magnetic fluctuations drive current against resistive diffusion
Tearing modes and resistive kink modes contribute to field sustainment
Dynamo activity can lead to magnetic field errors and confinement degradation
Pulsed poloidal current drive techniques aim to reduce fluctuations
Confinement scaling laws
Energy confinement time scales with plasma current and density
Lundquist number (S = τR / τA) plays crucial role in determining plasma behavior
Normalized beta (βN = β / (I/aB)) can exceed tokamak limits
Confinement improves in quasi-single helicity states with reduced magnetic chaos
Spheromak and field-reversed configurations
Compact toroid concepts combine aspects of tokamaks and RFPs
Aim for simplified reactor designs without toroidal field coils
Potential for high power density and pulsed operation
Spheromak: gun injection or flux core methods create self-organized configuration
FRC: field-reversed theta-pinch or rotating magnetic field techniques
Merging-compression schemes for high-flux, high-temperature plasmas
Plasmoid acceleration for fusion-based space propulsion concepts
Stability considerations
Tilt and shift modes pose major challenges for spheromaks
FRCs susceptible to rotational (n=2) instability
Finite Larmor radius effects can stabilize low-n modes in FRCs
Current-driven modes (kink, tearing) affect configuration lifetime
Confinement properties
Magnetic field structure determines particle orbits and transport
Spheromaks: confinement dominated by magnetic fluctuations and reconnection events
FRCs: high beta operation possible due to purely poloidal field structure
Scaling laws differ significantly from conventional toroidal devices
Plasma heating methods
Achieving fusion-relevant temperatures requires multiple heating techniques
Combination of methods used to heat both ions and electrons efficiently
Heating profile control important for optimizing confinement and stability
Ohmic heating limitations
Resistive heating from plasma current effective only at low temperatures
Plasma resistivity decreases with temperature (η ∝ T^(-3/2))
Maximum ohmic power limited by current carrying capacity of plasma
Typically insufficient to reach ignition conditions in fusion plasmas
Neutral beam injection
High-energy neutral atoms penetrate magnetic field and ionize in plasma
Beam energy determines deposition profile and ion/electron heating ratio
Negative ion sources enable higher beam energies for large devices
Momentum input from beams can drive plasma rotation and current
Radio frequency heating techniques
Ion cyclotron resonance heating (ICRH) targets specific ion species
Electron cyclotron resonance heating (ECRH) provides localized electron heating
Lower hybrid heating and current drive effective for edge plasma control
Alfvén wave heating explored for bulk ion heating in certain regimes
Confinement scaling laws
Empirical and theoretical models predict plasma performance in different regimes
Critical for extrapolating current experimental results to future fusion reactors
Inform design choices and operational scenarios for next-generation devices
Energy confinement time
Measures how long energy remains confined in the plasma
Defined as ratio of stored energy to heating power: τE = W / P
L-mode scaling: τE ∝ Ip^a Bt^b n^c P^(-0.5) R^d
H-mode scaling: enhanced confinement due to edge transport barrier formation
Lawson criterion
Condition for fusion energy breakeven: nTτE > 3 × 10^21 m^(-3) keV s
Triple product nTτE determines overall fusion performance
Different formulations for various fusion reactions (D-T, D-D, D-³He)
Ignition requires higher triple product to overcome bremsstrahlung losses
Beta limits
Ratio of plasma pressure to magnetic field pressure: β = 2μ0 / B^2
Troyon limit for tokamaks: βN = β(%) / (Ip/aBt) ≤ 3.5
Stability limits depend on plasma shape, current profile, and wall proximity
Advanced scenarios (reversed shear, high li) aim to exceed conventional limits
Plasma instabilities
Understanding and controlling instabilities crucial for achieving fusion conditions
Wide range of phenomena spanning multiple spatial and temporal scales
Active areas of theoretical, computational, and experimental research
MHD instabilities
Kink modes driven by current and pressure gradients
Ballooning modes limit achievable beta in regions of unfavorable curvature
Resistive wall modes grow on timescale of wall penetration time
Neoclassical tearing modes degrade confinement through magnetic island formation
Microinstabilities
Drift waves driven by density and temperature gradients
Ion temperature gradient (ITG) modes cause anomalous ion heat transport
Trapped electron modes (TEM) contribute to particle and electron heat transport
Electron temperature gradient (ETG) modes generate fine-scale turbulence
Disruption mitigation strategies
Massive gas injection introduces high-Z impurities to radiate energy
Shattered pellet injection provides rapid delivery of radiating material
Runaway electron suppression using magnetic perturbations or high-Z gases
Real-time stability control using external coils and localized heating/current drive
Diagnostics for confined plasmas
Wide array of measurement techniques required to characterize fusion plasmas
Combination of passive and active diagnostics provides comprehensive data
Challenges include high temperatures, strong magnetic fields, and neutron fluxes
Magnetic diagnostics
Rogowski coils measure total plasma current
Diamagnetic loops determine plasma pressure and stored energy
Mirnov coils detect MHD fluctuations and instabilities
Magnetic probes map edge field structure and plasma position
Optical emission spectroscopy
Line ratio techniques determine electron temperature and density
Doppler broadening and shifts measure ion temperature and rotation
Charge exchange recombination spectroscopy probes ion parameters
Zeeman splitting utilized for local magnetic field measurements
Neutron diagnostics
Neutron flux monitors provide fusion reaction rate measurements
Neutron spectrometry determines ion temperature and fuel composition
Neutron cameras create 2D profiles of fusion reaction distribution
Activation foil techniques measure time-integrated neutron fluence
Fusion power plant concepts
Integration of plasma physics, nuclear engineering, and materials science
Address key challenges of tritium self-sufficiency, neutron damage, and heat extraction
Aim for economically competitive and environmentally sustainable energy production
Tritium breeding
Lithium-containing blankets surround plasma to breed tritium fuel
Neutron multiplication using beryllium or lead increases breeding ratio
Liquid metal (PbLi) and ceramic breeder (Li4SiO4, Li2TiO3) concepts explored
Efficient tritium extraction and handling systems required for fuel cycle
Neutron shielding
High-energy neutrons (14.1 MeV) from D-T fusion reactions must be contained
Layered shield designs use materials like steel, water, and boron carbide
Radiation-resistant materials (reduced activation ferritic/martensitic steels) for structural components
Superconducting magnets require additional protection from neutron and gamma radiation
High-temperature blankets (600-1000°C) for efficient thermal energy conversion
Helium cooling allows for high temperature operation and tritium extraction
Dual-coolant lead-lithium (DCLL) concept combines breeding and heat removal
Advanced power conversion cycles (Brayton, supercritical CO2) for high efficiency