7.1 The roots of the Iranian Revolution

The Iranian Revolution's roots trace back to Mohammad Reza Shah's modernization efforts and the 1953 coup. The Shah's rapid westernization and economic reforms created social tensions, while his autocratic rule and ties to the West fueled resentment.

Religious opposition, led by Ayatollah Khomeini, gained traction as Iranians sought alternatives to the Shah's regime. Islamic fundamentalism merged with anti-imperialist sentiment, setting the stage for the revolution that would reshape Iran and the Middle East.

The Shah's Rule and Modernization

Mohammad Reza Shah's Reign and Reforms

Top images from around the web for Mohammad Reza Shah's Reign and Reforms

• 

  Reza Shah - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  White Revolution - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Reza Shah - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  White Revolution - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Mohammad Reza Shah's Reign and Reforms

• 

  Reza Shah - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  White Revolution - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Reza Shah - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  White Revolution - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi ruled Iran from 1941 to 1979
• Implemented modernization programs aimed at rapid industrialization and westernization
• Launched the White Revolution in 1963 to transform Iran's economy and society
  • Included land reform redistributing land from wealthy landowners to peasants
  • Expanded women's rights granting women the right to vote and hold public office
  • Promoted literacy through the creation of a Literacy Corps
• Established SAVAK (Organization of Intelligence and National Security) in 1957
  • Secret police force responsible for suppressing opposition to the Shah's rule
  • Employed torture and surveillance to maintain control over the population
• Pursued aggressive westernization policies
  • Encouraged adoption of Western dress and customs
  • Promoted secular education and reduced the influence of religious institutions
  • Cultivated close ties with Western powers, particularly the United States

Economic and Social Consequences

• Rapid modernization led to significant economic disparities
  • Urban areas experienced growth and development while rural regions lagged behind
  • Wealth concentrated among a small elite class closely tied to the Shah's regime
• Traditional sectors of the economy (agriculture, bazaars) suffered as focus shifted to industry
• Social dislocation resulted from rapid urbanization and cultural changes
  • Many Iranians felt alienated by the pace and direction of modernization
  • Traditional values and Islamic customs clashed with imposed Western norms
• Growing resentment among the working class and religious conservatives
  • Perceived the Shah's policies as serving foreign interests and the elite
  • Viewed westernization as a threat to Iranian cultural and religious identity

Religious Opposition and Islamic Fundamentalism

Rise of Ayatollah Khomeini and Shi'a Resistance

• Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini emerged as a prominent critic of the Shah's regime
  • Gained popularity for his fiery sermons denouncing the Shah's policies
  • Advocated for a return to Islamic governance and rejection of Western influence
• Exiled to Iraq in 1964 after speaking out against the Shah's reforms
  • Continued to lead opposition from abroad through recorded messages and writings
• Shi'a Islam played a central role in mobilizing resistance against the Shah
  • Shi'a clergy (ulama) maintained influence over large segments of the population
  • Religious networks and institutions provided organizational structure for opposition
• Concept of velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the Islamic jurist) developed by Khomeini
  • Proposed a system of Islamic governance led by religious scholars
  • Offered an alternative to the Shah's secular monarchy

Growth of Islamic Fundamentalism

• Islamic fundamentalism gained traction as a response to perceived Western domination
  • Called for a return to "pure" Islamic principles and rejection of foreign influences
  • Appealed to those disillusioned with the Shah's modernization programs
• Religious institutions like mosques and madrasas became centers of opposition
  • Provided spaces for dissemination of anti-Shah messages
  • Offered social services to the poor, building grassroots support
• Fusion of religious ideology with anti-imperialist and nationalist sentiments
  • Portrayed the Shah as a puppet of Western powers, particularly the United States
  • Framed the struggle against the regime as a fight for Iranian independence and Islamic values
• Growing appeal of Islamic fundamentalism among students and intellectuals
  • Many saw it as a means to assert cultural identity and resist Western hegemony
  • Islamic ideology offered a framework for social justice and political change

Historical Context and Foreign Influence

Oil Nationalization and Its Aftermath

• Oil nationalization crisis of 1951-1953 shaped Iran's political landscape
  • Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh led efforts to nationalize the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company
  • Aimed to assert Iranian control over its natural resources and reduce foreign influence
• British-led oil embargo and economic pressure in response to nationalization
  • Severely impacted Iran's economy and created political instability
• United States initially attempted to mediate the dispute
  • Growing Cold War tensions led to increased U.S. concern over potential Soviet influence in Iran

The 1953 Coup d'état and Its Consequences

• CIA and MI6 orchestrated coup (Operation Ajax) overthrew Mosaddegh in August 1953
  • Restored Mohammad Reza Shah to power with expanded authority
  • Allowed Western oil companies to regain control of Iran's oil industry
• Long-lasting impact on Iranian politics and U.S.-Iran relations
  • Created deep-seated resentment towards foreign intervention in Iranian affairs
  • Undermined the legitimacy of the Shah's rule in the eyes of many Iranians
• Strengthened anti-Western sentiment and fueled nationalist movements
  • Contributed to the growth of both secular and religious opposition groups
• Shah's increased dependence on U.S. support after the coup
  • Received significant military and economic aid from the United States
  • Perception of the Shah as a U.S. puppet grew among the Iranian population
• Legacy of the coup influenced the anti-American rhetoric of the Iranian Revolution
  • Used as evidence of Western imperialism and interference in Iranian sovereignty
  • Shaped the revolutionary government's stance towards the United States and the West