13.2 Consequences of the Great Leap Forward

The Great Leap Forward, Mao's ambitious plan to rapidly industrialize China, led to devastating economic and social consequences. Agricultural output plummeted, industrial production was disrupted, and the economy collapsed, resulting in widespread famine and starvation.

The campaign's failure had far-reaching political implications for Mao and the CCP. It temporarily weakened Mao's power, damaged the party's credibility, and led to shifts in economic policy. Long-term, it set back China's development, delaying modernization and industrialization efforts.

Economic and Social Consequences

Economic consequences of Great Leap Forward

Top images from around the web for Economic consequences of Great Leap Forward

• 

  Great Leap Forward - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:1 AD to 2003 AD Historical Trends in global distribution of GDP China India Western Europe ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Famines - Our World in Data View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Great Leap Forward - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:1 AD to 2003 AD Historical Trends in global distribution of GDP China India Western Europe ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Economic consequences of Great Leap Forward

• 

  Great Leap Forward - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:1 AD to 2003 AD Historical Trends in global distribution of GDP China India Western Europe ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Famines - Our World in Data View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Great Leap Forward - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  File:1 AD to 2003 AD Historical Trends in global distribution of GDP China India Western Europe ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Severe decline in agricultural output
  • Diversion of labor from agriculture to steel production shifted focus away from food production
  • Farmers forced to adopt unproven and ineffective agricultural techniques like close planting and deep plowing, leading to soil depletion
  • Widespread crop failures and reduced harvests resulted in food shortages (grains, vegetables)
• Disruption of industrial production
  • Emphasis on small-scale, backyard steel furnaces diverted resources from other industries
  • Neglect of other industrial sectors such as textiles and machinery led to imbalanced development
  • Production of low-quality, unusable steel due to lack of expertise and proper equipment
• Collapse of the economy
  • Sharp decline in both agricultural and industrial output caused a severe economic recession
  • Disruption of trade and distribution networks hindered the flow of goods and resources (railways, ports)
  • Depletion of resources and capital through wasteful and inefficient projects (irrigation systems, dams)

Social effects of Great Leap Forward

• Widespread famine and starvation
  • Estimated 20-45 million deaths between 1959 and 1961 due to severe food shortages
  • Caused by reduced food production and ineffective distribution systems that prioritized urban areas
  • Disproportionately affected rural areas, with some villages losing over half their population
• Breakdown of social structures
  • Separation of families due to communal living and work arrangements in people's communes
  • Erosion of traditional values and customs as the state promoted collectivism and loyalty to the party
  • Increased state control over individuals' lives through strict regulation of daily activities (work schedules, meal times)
• Long-term demographic impact
  • Reduced population growth rates due to high mortality and lower fertility during the famine years
  • Skewed age structure due to high mortality among children and elderly, leaving a "lost generation"
  • Lasting effects on health and human capital, such as stunted growth and impaired cognitive development (malnutrition, disease)

Political and Long-term Implications

Political repercussions for Mao Zedong

• Temporary decline in Mao's power and influence
  • Criticism and opposition from other party leaders who questioned Mao's policies and leadership
  • Brief period of moderation and pragmatism under Liu Shaoqi and Deng Xiaoping, who sought to correct the excesses of the Great Leap Forward
  • Mao's eventual resurgence and purge of rivals during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) to reassert his authority
• Damage to the CCP's legitimacy and credibility
  • Public disillusionment and loss of faith in the party's leadership due to the suffering caused by the Great Leap Forward
  • Erosion of trust between the party and the masses, as people questioned the party's ability to govern effectively
  • Need for the party to rebuild its image and authority through propaganda and political campaigns (Mao cult, rectification movements)
• Shifts in economic policy
  • Abandonment of radical, utopian economic goals in favor of more realistic targets
  • Greater emphasis on practical results and material incentives to boost productivity (work points system, private plots)
  • Gradual move towards market-oriented reforms in later years under Deng Xiaoping (household responsibility system, special economic zones)

Long-term implications for China's development

• Setback to China's economic development
  • Years of lost growth and productivity due to the disruption caused by the Great Leap Forward
  • Depletion of resources and capital through wasteful investments and failed projects
  • Need to rebuild infrastructure and productive capacity, which took years to recover (factories, transportation networks)
• Delayed modernization and industrialization
  • Failure to achieve rapid, large-scale industrialization as envisioned by Mao and the party leadership
  • Persistence of rural poverty and underdevelopment, as the countryside bore the brunt of the famine and economic disruption
  • Widening gap between China and more advanced nations in terms of technology and living standards (Japan, South Korea)
• Lessons for future policy-making
  • Cautionary tale about the dangers of ideologically-driven, top-down campaigns that ignore local conditions and expertise
  • Recognition of the importance of pragmatism and evidence-based decision-making in economic planning and management
  • Impetus for later reforms and opening-up under Deng Xiaoping, who sought to avoid the mistakes of the Mao era (market reforms, foreign investment)