10.3 Art criticism and the politics of value

Art criticism shapes how we see and value art. Critics interpret works, influencing their significance in the art world. Their words can make or break an artist's reputation, affecting market value and historical importance.

Power dynamics in art criticism are complex. Institutions, money, and social connections all play a role. These factors can determine which artists get attention and how their work is perceived, sometimes reinforcing existing hierarchies in the art world.

Art Criticism and Value Construction

The Role of Art Criticism in Shaping Public Perception

Top images from around the web for The Role of Art Criticism in Shaping Public Perception

• 

  How To View Critics Telling You How to View Art in a Museum – Thinking about Museums View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Art Criticism Today and Tomorrow View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ultra Micro MOOC….Online Art Video Critique | njacquesblog View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  How To View Critics Telling You How to View Art in a Museum – Thinking about Museums View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Art Criticism Today and Tomorrow View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for The Role of Art Criticism in Shaping Public Perception

• 

  How To View Critics Telling You How to View Art in a Museum – Thinking about Museums View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Art Criticism Today and Tomorrow View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Ultra Micro MOOC….Online Art Video Critique | njacquesblog View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  How To View Critics Telling You How to View Art in a Museum – Thinking about Museums View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Art Criticism Today and Tomorrow View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Art criticism plays a significant role in shaping public perception and understanding of art by providing interpretations, evaluations, and contextual information
• Critics' assessments of artworks, based on their expertise and aesthetic judgments, can influence the perceived value and significance of those works within the art world and beyond (e.g., a positive review from a renowned critic can boost an artist's reputation)
• The language and rhetorical strategies employed by critics can frame artworks in particular ways, emphasizing certain qualities or meanings while downplaying others, thus contributing to the construction of artistic value (e.g., focusing on an artwork's technical innovation rather than its social commentary)
• The prominence and reputation of certain critics or critical platforms can amplify their influence on the reception and valuation of art (e.g., a review in a prestigious art magazine like Artforum)

The Cumulative Impact of Critical Discourse

• The cumulative discourse surrounding an artwork or artist, shaped by multiple critical voices over time, can contribute to the long-term establishment or revision of artistic value
• Art criticism can also contribute to the canonization of certain artists or artworks, solidifying their place in art historical narratives and influencing their market value (e.g., the critical acclaim surrounding Pablo Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon)
• Sustained critical attention and debate around an artwork or artist can generate increased public interest and engagement, further shaping perceptions of value
• The evolution of critical perspectives over time can lead to the reappraisal or rediscovery of previously overlooked or undervalued artists and artworks (e.g., the reevaluation of female artists like Hilma af Klint or Frida Kahlo)

Power Dynamics in Art Criticism

Institutional and Economic Power

• The art world is characterized by various power relations and hierarchies that can influence the production, circulation, and reception of art critical discourse
• Institutional power, held by museums, galleries, and other established art organizations, can shape the platforms and contexts in which art criticism is disseminated and legitimized (e.g., a museum's decision to host a major retrospective exhibition)
• Economic power, wielded by collectors, patrons, and the art market, can influence the visibility and perceived value of certain artists or artworks, which in turn can affect critical attention and discourse (e.g., the high prices fetched by contemporary artists like Jeff Koons or Damien Hirst)
• The commercial interests of galleries and art fairs can impact the focus and tone of critical discourse, potentially privileging marketable or trendy artists over others

Social and Cultural Capital

• The social and cultural capital of individual critics, based on their reputation, affiliations, and networks, can impact the reach and influence of their critical perspectives
• Critics associated with prestigious institutions, publications, or academic circles may have greater authority and credibility in shaping art discourse (e.g., critics writing for The New York Times or Art in America)
• Power imbalances related to factors such as race, gender, class, and geography can affect the representation and inclusion of diverse critical voices within art discourse (e.g., the underrepresentation of critics of color or from non-Western regions)
• The dominant artistic canon and art historical narratives, shaped by long-standing power structures, can frame the context in which contemporary art is interpreted and evaluated by critics (e.g., the influence of the Western art canon on critical assessments of non-Western art)

Social Factors and Art Reception

Cultural Context and Values

• The reception of art is deeply influenced by the broader social, political, and cultural contexts in which it is produced and encountered
• Prevailing cultural values, norms, and ideologies can shape the interpretation and evaluation of artworks, influencing how they are perceived and understood by audiences and critics (e.g., the reception of controversial artworks that challenge religious or moral beliefs)
• Political climates and events can affect the reception of art, particularly when artworks engage with or respond to contentious issues or social movements (e.g., the impact of the Black Lives Matter movement on the reception of works by Black artists)
• Social factors such as class, education, and access to cultural resources can impact individuals' exposure to and engagement with art, shaping their receptivity to different forms of artistic expression (e.g., the role of art education in fostering appreciation for abstract or conceptual art)

Artist Identity and Background

• The identity and background of the artist, including their race, gender, sexuality, and cultural heritage, can influence how their work is received and interpreted by different audiences and critics
• Artworks by marginalized or underrepresented artists may face additional scrutiny or be subject to biased interpretations based on stereotypes or limited understanding of their cultural contexts (e.g., the reception of works by Indigenous artists in the context of colonial art histories)
• The personal experiences, intentions, and perspectives of the artist can shape the meaning and significance of their work, influencing how it is received and understood by viewers and critics (e.g., the impact of an artist's biography on the interpretation of their self-portraits)
• The intersection of multiple aspects of an artist's identity can create complex dynamics in the reception of their work, as different audiences may prioritize or overlook certain facets of their identity (e.g., the reception of works by queer artists of color)

Institutional and Historical Contexts

• Historical and art historical contexts, including artistic movements, styles, and precedents, can provide frameworks for the reception and evaluation of contemporary art (e.g., situating a contemporary painting within the tradition of abstract expressionism)
• The physical and institutional contexts in which art is encountered, such as museums, galleries, public spaces, or online platforms, can shape the conditions of its reception and interpretation (e.g., the impact of a museum's curatorial framing on the perception of an artwork)
• The reputation and perceived authority of the institutions presenting or collecting an artwork can influence its reception and valuation (e.g., the prestige associated with having a work acquired by a major museum like MoMA or the Louvre)
• The historical significance and cultural legacy of certain artworks or artists can shape the expectations and responses of contemporary audiences and critics (e.g., the enduring influence of Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa on popular perceptions of art)

Art Criticism and Value Systems

Challenging Dominant Value Systems

• Art criticism has the potential to question, critique, and subvert dominant value systems and power structures within the art world and society at large
• Critics can use their platform to amplify marginalized voices and perspectives, challenging the exclusionary tendencies of the artistic canon and art historical narratives (e.g., championing the work of women artists or artists from the Global South)
• By engaging with artworks that address social, political, and cultural issues, critics can highlight the transformative and disruptive potential of art in relation to dominant norms and ideologies (e.g., analyzing the subversive elements in the work of artists like Banksy or Ai Weiwei)
• Critical discourse can interrogate the assumptions and biases underlying established systems of artistic value, exposing their limitations and proposing alternative frameworks for understanding and appreciating art (e.g., questioning the primacy of Western aesthetic standards in evaluating non-Western art)

Reinforcing Dominant Value Systems

• However, art criticism can also reinforce dominant value systems by perpetuating traditional hierarchies, canonical standards, and exclusionary practices within the art world
• The language and criteria used by critics to evaluate and legitimize art can reflect and reproduce dominant cultural values and aesthetic preferences (e.g., prioritizing formalist analysis over social or political context)
• The selective attention and visibility given to certain artists, artworks, or artistic practices by critics can contribute to the maintenance of existing power structures and inequalities within the art world (e.g., the disproportionate coverage of male artists in major art publications)
• The institutional and economic pressures that shape art critical discourse can limit the potential for radical critique and reinforce the status quo of the art market and established art institutions (e.g., the influence of gallery or museum sponsorships on critical coverage)
• The reliance on established critical frameworks and methodologies can hinder the recognition and appreciation of innovative or unconventional artistic practices that challenge dominant norms (e.g., the initial resistance to conceptual art or performance art by some critics)