Pythagorean triples and irrational numbers are key concepts in ancient Greek mathematics . These ideas challenged the Pythagorean belief that all was number and led to a crisis in Greek math.
The discovery of irrational numbers, like √ 2, expanded our understanding of numbers beyond rationals. This breakthrough paved the way for new mathematical concepts and methods of proof.
Pythagorean Triples
Understanding Pythagorean Triples and Their Properties
Top images from around the web for Understanding Pythagorean Triples and Their Properties Category:Pythagorean triples - Wikimedia Commons View original
Is this image relevant?
Math-Journal:Understanding Math: Fibonacci Meets Pythagoras... View original
Is this image relevant?
Pythagorean theorem - Wikiversity View original
Is this image relevant?
Category:Pythagorean triples - Wikimedia Commons View original
Is this image relevant?
Math-Journal:Understanding Math: Fibonacci Meets Pythagoras... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Understanding Pythagorean Triples and Their Properties Category:Pythagorean triples - Wikimedia Commons View original
Is this image relevant?
Math-Journal:Understanding Math: Fibonacci Meets Pythagoras... View original
Is this image relevant?
Pythagorean theorem - Wikiversity View original
Is this image relevant?
Category:Pythagorean triples - Wikimedia Commons View original
Is this image relevant?
Math-Journal:Understanding Math: Fibonacci Meets Pythagoras... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Pythagorean triples consist of three positive integers (a, b, c) satisfying the equation a 2 + b 2 = c 2 a^2 + b^2 = c^2 a 2 + b 2 = c 2
Represent the side lengths of right triangles where c is the hypotenuse
Common examples include (3, 4, 5), (5, 12, 13), and (8, 15, 17)
Can be generated using the formulas: a = m 2 − n 2 , b = 2 m n , c = m 2 + n 2 a = m^2 - n^2, b = 2mn, c = m^2 + n^2 a = m 2 − n 2 , b = 2 mn , c = m 2 + n 2 where m and n are positive integers with m > n
Primitive Pythagorean triples have no common factors among the three numbers
(3, 4, 5) is a primitive triple, while (6, 8, 10) is not primitive as it's a multiple of (3, 4, 5)
To generate primitive triples, m and n must be coprime and not both odd
Rational Numbers and Their Relationship to Pythagorean Triples
Rational numbers express as fractions p q \frac{p}{q} q p where p and q are integers and q ≠ 0
All Pythagorean triples consist of rational numbers
Ratios of Pythagorean triple components always yield rational numbers
Pythagorean triples can be used to approximate irrational numbers (√2 ≈ 7/5)
Rational solutions to the Pythagorean equation correspond to points with rational coordinates on the unit circle
Irrational Numbers
Defining and Exploring Irrational Numbers
Irrational numbers cannot express as fractions p q \frac{p}{q} q p where p and q are integers and q ≠ 0
Have non-repeating, non-terminating decimal representations
Include famous constants like π , e , and √2
Discovered by the Pythagoreans when studying the diagonal of a unit square
Square root of 2 (√2) serves as a classic example of an irrational number
√2 approximately equals 1.41421356..., with digits continuing infinitely without pattern
Incommensurable Lengths and Their Significance
Incommensurable lengths lack a common unit of measurement
Diagonal and side of a square exemplify incommensurable lengths
Led to a crisis in Greek mathematics, challenging the Pythagorean belief that all was number
Expanded the concept of number beyond rational numbers
Resulted in the development of geometric algebra to handle irrational magnitudes
Algebraic and Transcendental Numbers
Algebraic numbers serve as roots of polynomial equations with integer coefficients
Include all rational numbers and some irrational numbers (√2, ³√5)
Transcendental numbers are irrational numbers that are not algebraic
π and e are famous examples of transcendental numbers
Transcendental numbers are "more irrational" than algebraic irrationals
Proved to exist by Liouville in 1844, with π proven transcendental by Lindemann in 1882
Proving Irrationality
Proof by Contradiction Method
Proof by contradiction assumes the opposite of what we want to prove
If this assumption leads to a logical contradiction, the original statement must be true
Widely used in mathematics for proving the irrationality of numbers
Steps involve assuming the number is rational, deriving a contradiction, and concluding irrationality
Powerful technique for proving statements about infinite sets or abstract concepts
Demonstrating the Irrationality of √2
Assume √2 is rational, can be expressed as p q \frac{p}{q} q p where p and q are integers with no common factors
Square both sides: 2 = p 2 q 2 2 = \frac{p^2}{q^2} 2 = q 2 p 2
Multiply by q²: 2 q 2 = p 2 2q^2 = p^2 2 q 2 = p 2
p² must be even, so p must be even (p = 2k for some integer k)
Substitute: 2 q 2 = ( 2 k ) 2 = 4 k 2 2q^2 = (2k)^2 = 4k^2 2 q 2 = ( 2 k ) 2 = 4 k 2
Divide by 2: q 2 = 2 k 2 q^2 = 2k^2 q 2 = 2 k 2
q² must be even, so q must be even
Contradicts the assumption that p and q have no common factors
Therefore, √2 must be irrational
Exploring Incommensurable Lengths Geometrically
Incommensurable lengths lack a common unit of measurement
Diagonal of a unit square has length √2, incommensurable with the side length
Attempt to find a common measure leads to an infinite process of smaller and smaller squares
Relates to the Euclidean algorithm for finding greatest common divisors
Provides a geometric intuition for the irrationality of √2
Extends to other irrational lengths in geometry (golden ratio in regular pentagons)