emerged in the 1930s as a reaction to pictorialism, championing "" with and minimal manipulation. Led by and , the group emphasized the unique qualities of photography as an art form.
Their technical approach revolutionized landscape photography, using large format cameras and small apertures to achieve deep focus. Group f/64's aesthetic philosophy centered on revealing the subject's inherent beauty through precise technique, influencing generations of photographers and shaping modern landscape imagery.
Origins of Group f/64
Group f/64 emerged in the 1930s as a response to the dominant pictorialist style in photography, marking a significant shift in the history of the medium
The group's formation reflected a growing desire among photographers to establish photography as a distinct art form with its own aesthetic principles
Their approach emphasized the unique qualities of the photographic medium, rejecting the painterly techniques favored by pictorialists
Founding members
Top images from around the web for Founding members
HISTORIA DE LA FOTOGRAFIA (IX) | Andén 27 View original
Is this image relevant?
What Ansel Adams Taught Me | Getty Iris View original
Is this image relevant?
HISTORIA DE LA FOTOGRAFIA (IX) | Andén 27 View original
Is this image relevant?
What Ansel Adams Taught Me | Getty Iris View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Top images from around the web for Founding members
HISTORIA DE LA FOTOGRAFIA (IX) | Andén 27 View original
Is this image relevant?
What Ansel Adams Taught Me | Getty Iris View original
Is this image relevant?
HISTORIA DE LA FOTOGRAFIA (IX) | Andén 27 View original
Is this image relevant?
What Ansel Adams Taught Me | Getty Iris View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 2
Ansel Adams and Edward Weston initiated the formation of Group f/64 in 1932
Willard Van Dyke played a crucial role in organizing the group and providing exhibition space
Imogen Cunningham brought her expertise in botanical photography to the collective
Other founding members included John Paul Edwards, Sonya Noskowiak, and Henry Swift
Reaction to pictorialism
Group f/64 formed as a direct challenge to the soft-focus, manipulated images of pictorialism
Members criticized pictorialism for imitating painting rather than embracing photography's unique qualities
The group advocated for sharp focus and high contrast as defining characteristics of photographic art
They rejected the use of special lenses, filters, or darkroom manipulations that were common in pictorialist work
Manifesto and principles
The group's manifesto emphasized "pure photography" free from manipulation or imitation of other art forms
Members committed to producing work with maximum image sharpness and clarity
The manifesto called for photographs to be presented without alteration in the darkroom
Group f/64 promoted the idea of "straight photography" focusing on the subject's inherent qualities
Their principles emphasized the importance of pre-visualization and careful composition in the field
Technical aspects
Group f/64's technical approach revolutionized landscape photography by prioritizing image clarity and detail
Their methods required precise control over , development, and printing processes
The group's techniques influenced the development of photographic equipment and materials
Large format cameras
Group f/64 photographers primarily used large format view cameras (8x10 inches or larger)
These cameras allowed for precise control over perspective and image plane alignment
Large negatives provided exceptional detail and in the final prints
View cameras facilitated the use of movements (tilt, shift, swing, rise, fall) for creative control
The slow, deliberate process of using large format cameras aligned with the group's emphasis on careful composition
Deep focus photography
Deep focus technique aimed to render all elements of the image in sharp focus
Photographers used small apertures (high f-numbers) to achieve extended
This approach required longer exposure times, often necessitating the use of tripods
Deep focus allowed for the inclusion of detailed foreground elements alongside distant landscapes
The technique emphasized the relationship between near and far elements in the composition
Aperture and depth of field
Group f/64 derived its name from the smallest aperture (f/64) commonly available on large format lenses
Small apertures like f/64 produced the greatest depth of field, keeping both foreground and background in focus
Using such small apertures required longer exposure times, often several seconds or more
Photographers carefully calculated exposure to balance depth of field with acceptable sharpness
The group's emphasis on small apertures contrasted with the wider apertures often used in pictorialist work
Aesthetic philosophy
Group f/64's aesthetic philosophy centered on revealing the inherent beauty of the subject through precise photographic technique
Their approach emphasized the unique qualities of photography as distinct from other visual arts
The group's aesthetic principles had a lasting impact on the development of modernist photography
Pure photography movement
Pure photography advocated for images that were sharply focused and free from manipulation
The movement emphasized the camera's ability to capture reality with precision and clarity
Photographers sought to reveal the essential qualities of their subjects through careful observation
Pure photography rejected the use of soft focus, special filters, or extensive darkroom manipulation
The movement aimed to establish photography as a unique art form with its own aesthetic language
Emphasis on sharp focus
Sharp focus became a hallmark of Group f/64's style, contrasting with the soft-focus pictorialist approach
Photographers used small apertures and large format cameras to achieve maximum depth of field
The emphasis on sharpness extended from the foreground to the background of the image
Sharp focus allowed for the detailed rendering of textures, forms, and tonal gradations
This technique required precise focusing and often the use of a magnifying loupe to ensure critical sharpness
Rejection of manipulation
Group f/64 strongly opposed darkroom manipulation techniques common in pictorialist photography
Members committed to producing "straight" prints that faithfully represented the original negative
The group rejected techniques such as composite printing or extensive retouching
Minimal dodging and burning were allowed only to correct for technical limitations of the medium
This approach aimed to maintain the integrity of the photographic process and the photographer's vision
Key photographers
The core members of Group f/64 were influential figures who shaped the course of 20th-century photography
Their individual styles and subject matter varied, but they shared a commitment to the group's principles
These photographers' work continues to be celebrated and studied in the history of photography
Ansel Adams
Renowned for his dramatic black and white landscapes of the American West
Developed the for precise control over exposure and development
Authored influential books on photographic technique and aesthetics
Advocated for environmental conservation through his photography
Served as a teacher and mentor to many aspiring photographers
Edward Weston
Known for his modernist approach to still life, nude, and landscape photography
Pioneered the use of small apertures for extended depth of field in close-up photography
Created iconic images of peppers, shells, and sand dunes
Influenced by Mexican muralists and the precisionist movement in painting
His daybooks provide valuable insights into his photographic process and philosophy
Imogen Cunningham
Specialized in botanical photography and portraiture
Known for her sharp-focus, close-up studies of plants and flowers
Explored abstract forms in industrial and architectural subjects
One of the first women to gain recognition in the male-dominated field of photography
Her work bridged pictorialism and modernism, evolving throughout her long career
Iconic landscapes
Group f/64 photographers created enduring images of the American landscape, particularly in the Western United States
Their work helped shape public perception of these landscapes and contributed to conservation efforts
The iconic images produced by the group continue to influence landscape photography today
Yosemite National Park
Ansel Adams' photographs of Yosemite became synonymous with the park's grandeur
Images like "Clearing Winter Storm" and "Moon and Half Dome" are among the most recognizable landscape photographs
Group f/64 photographers captured Yosemite's dramatic rock formations, waterfalls, and forests
Their work contributed to the preservation and popularity of Yosemite as a national park
The park's diverse landscapes provided opportunities to demonstrate the group's technical mastery
California coast
Edward Weston's images of Point Lobos became iconic representations of the California coastline
Photographers captured the rugged beauty of Big Sur and other coastal areas
The interplay of land and sea provided dynamic subjects for Group f/64's sharp-focus approach
Coastal landscapes allowed for exploration of textures, patterns, and tonal gradations
These images often featured dramatic skies and long exposures to capture the movement of water
Southwest deserts
The stark landscapes of the American Southwest became favored subjects for Group f/64 photographers
Ansel Adams captured the otherworldly forms of sand dunes in Death Valley
Edward Weston's images of White Sands, New Mexico, explored abstract patterns in nature
The desert's clear air and strong light were ideal for the group's emphasis on sharp focus and tonal range
These landscapes allowed photographers to explore minimalist compositions and subtle gradations of tone
Influence on American photography
Group f/64's approach had a profound and lasting impact on the development of American photography
Their work helped establish photography as a respected art form in its own right
The group's influence extended beyond landscape photography to other genres and styles
Shift towards modernism
Group f/64 played a crucial role in moving American photography away from pictorialism towards modernism
Their emphasis on sharp focus and straight printing aligned with broader modernist trends in art
The group's work influenced the development of New Objectivity in photography
Their approach paved the way for later modernist photographers like Minor White and Paul Strand
Group f/64's aesthetic principles became foundational for many photography programs and schools
Impact on documentary style
The group's emphasis on clarity and detail influenced the development of documentary photography
Their techniques were adopted by photographers working for the Farm Security Administration (FSA)
The straight photography approach became associated with truthfulness and objectivity in reportage
Group f/64's influence can be seen in the work of documentary photographers like Dorothea Lange
Their aesthetic principles shaped how social and environmental issues were visually represented
Legacy in fine art photography
Group f/64's work helped establish photography as a legitimate form of fine art
Their prints became highly valued and collected by major museums and galleries
The group's approach influenced subsequent generations of art photographers
Their emphasis on craft and technical excellence set standards for fine art printing
Group f/64's legacy can be seen in contemporary landscape and still life photography
Criticism and controversies
Despite their significant influence, Group f/64 and their approach faced various criticisms and debates
These controversies reflected broader discussions about the nature of photography as an art form
The group's strong stance on photographic purity sparked ongoing debates in the field
Elitism accusations
Critics argued that Group f/64's emphasis on technical perfection was elitist and exclusionary
The high cost of large format equipment limited access to their techniques
Some viewed the group's rejection of amateur and pictorialist work as overly dogmatic
The focus on Western landscapes was seen by some as neglecting other photographic subjects and styles
Critics argued that the group's approach privileged certain types of subject matter over others
Limitations of approach
Some photographers felt that Group f/64's strict adherence to straight photography was limiting
The emphasis on sharpness and clarity was seen as potentially unsuitable for certain subjects or moods
Critics argued that the group's approach could lead to formulaic or repetitive imagery
The rejection of manipulation was viewed by some as artificially constraining the medium's potential
Some photographers felt that the group's techniques were not well-suited to capturing fleeting moments or action
Debates on artistic expression
Group f/64's emphasis on technical perfection sparked debates about the nature of artistic expression in photography
Some argued that their approach prioritized technique over emotional or personal vision
The group's rejection of manipulation raised questions about the role of the photographer's interpretation
Debates emerged about whether photography should strive for objectivity or embrace subjectivity
The group's influence led to ongoing discussions about the boundaries between documentation and art in photography
Straight photography techniques
Straight photography techniques formed the core of Group f/64's approach to image-making
These methods emphasized careful control over every aspect of the photographic process
The techniques developed by Group f/64 continue to influence photographers working in various genres
Zone system
Developed by Ansel Adams and Fred Archer to precisely control exposure and development
Divides the tonal range of a scene into 11 zones from pure black (Zone 0) to pure white (Zone X)
Allows photographers to visualize and control the final print's tonal values before taking the photograph
Involves careful metering of different areas of the scene and placement of key tones
Requires adjusting development times to achieve the desired contrast range in the negative
Previsualization
Concept popularized by Ansel Adams emphasizing mental visualization of the final print before exposure
Involves carefully considering composition, tonal relationships, and desired emotional impact
Requires a deep understanding of how the camera's settings will affect the final image
Encourages thoughtful, deliberate approach to photography rather than spontaneous shooting
Helps photographers make intentional decisions about exposure, development, and printing
Tonal range and contrast
Group f/64 photographers sought to capture a full range of tones from deep blacks to bright whites
Careful exposure and development techniques were used to preserve detail in highlights and shadows
Photographers often used colored filters to adjust the tonal relationships between different elements
Printing techniques such as split-grade printing were employed to control local contrast
The group's emphasis on tonal range influenced the development of film and paper with extended dynamic range
Exhibition and recognition
Group f/64's exhibitions and critical reception played a crucial role in establishing their influence
Their shows helped to legitimize straight photography as a serious art form
The group's work gained recognition from major institutions, further solidifying their place in photographic history
First Group f/64 show
Held at the M.H. de Young Memorial Museum in San Francisco in November 1932
Featured 80 photographs by the seven founding members of the group
The exhibition's statement of purpose outlined the group's commitment to pure photography
The show received significant attention and sparked debates about photographic aesthetics
Marked a turning point in the acceptance of straight photography in the art world
Museum of Modern Art exhibitions
MoMA's photography department, established in 1940, played a key role in promoting Group f/64's work
Ansel Adams' first solo exhibition at MoMA in 1936 helped establish his reputation
Edward Weston's 1946 retrospective at MoMA solidified his place in the photographic canon
Group f/64 members were featured in numerous group shows exploring modern photography
MoMA's support helped legitimize straight photography as a serious art form
Critical reception
Initial reactions to Group f/64's work were mixed, with some critics praising their technical mastery
Over time, the group's approach gained increasing acceptance and influence
Critics like Beaumont Newhall played a key role in promoting and contextualizing their work
The group's emphasis on photographic purity sparked ongoing debates in photographic criticism
By the mid-20th century, Group f/64's approach had become a dominant paradigm in art photography
Legacy and modern interpretations
Group f/64's influence continues to be felt in contemporary photography and visual culture
Their work has been reinterpreted and challenged by subsequent generations of photographers
The group's principles continue to spark debates about the nature and purpose of photography
Digital vs analog debate
The rise of digital photography has reignited discussions about photographic purity and manipulation
Some photographers continue to work with large format film cameras in the tradition of Group f/64
Digital techniques have made some of Group f/64's technical challenges easier to overcome
Debates continue about whether digital manipulation is compatible with straight photography principles
Some contemporary photographers combine digital and analog techniques to achieve Group f/64-inspired results
Contemporary landscape photography
Many contemporary landscape photographers continue to be influenced by Group f/64's aesthetic
Environmental concerns have led to new interpretations of the landscape photography tradition
Some photographers challenge Group f/64's approach by embracing manipulation or alternative processes
The proliferation of digital cameras has made high-quality landscape photography more accessible
Contemporary photographers often grapple with how to depict landscapes already made iconic by Group f/64
Preservation of f/64 ideals
Some photographers and institutions continue to promote and teach Group f/64's techniques and philosophy
The zone system and other technical approaches developed by the group remain relevant in digital photography
Museums and galleries continue to exhibit and collect work by Group f/64 members and their followers
Photography education often includes study of Group f/64's principles and techniques
Debates continue about the relevance of Group f/64's purist approach in the age of digital manipulation