4.1 The Constitutional Convention and Ratification

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was a pivotal moment in American history. Delegates from across the nation gathered to address the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation and create a new system of government that would unite the states and protect individual liberties.

The convention resulted in the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, a document that would shape the nation for centuries to come. Through compromises and debates, the Founding Fathers created a system of checks and balances, established a strong federal government, and laid the groundwork for ratification by the states.

Compromises at the Constitutional Convention

Representation in the Legislative Branch

Top images from around the web for Representation in the Legislative Branch

• 

  Constitutions and Contracts: Was another new contract really necessary in 1787? | United States ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  6.3: The Constitutional Convention - Humanities LibreTexts View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Edmund Randolph - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Constitutions and Contracts: Was another new contract really necessary in 1787? | United States ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  6.3: The Constitutional Convention - Humanities LibreTexts View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Representation in the Legislative Branch

• 

  Constitutions and Contracts: Was another new contract really necessary in 1787? | United States ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  6.3: The Constitutional Convention - Humanities LibreTexts View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Edmund Randolph - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Constitutions and Contracts: Was another new contract really necessary in 1787? | United States ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  6.3: The Constitutional Convention - Humanities LibreTexts View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• The Great Compromise, proposed by Roger Sherman, established a bicameral legislature
  • House of Representatives based on population, ensuring larger states had more influence
  • Senate providing equal representation for each state, protecting the interests of smaller states
• The Three-Fifths Compromise resolved the issue of how to count slaves for the purpose of representation and taxation
  • Counted three-fifths of the slave population, giving Southern states more representation in the House
  • Resulted in a balance of power between Northern and Southern states

Powers of Congress and the Slave Trade

• The Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise granted Congress the power to regulate interstate and foreign commerce
  • Ensured a unified national economy and prevented states from enacting trade barriers
  • Prohibited Congress from banning the international slave trade until 1808, appeasing Southern states
• The Electoral College was created as a compromise between those who wanted Congress to choose the president and those who favored a popular vote
  • Electors chosen by each state, with the number of electors equal to the state's total congressional representation
  • Prevented the tyranny of the majority and ensured a balance of power between large and small states

Executive Power and Checks and Balances

• The compromise on the power of the executive resulted in a single executive with veto power
  • President could veto legislation passed by Congress, serving as a check on the legislative branch
  • Veto subject to Congressional override with a two-thirds majority in both houses
• The executive was subject to impeachment by Congress, ensuring accountability and preventing abuse of power
  • House of Representatives has the power to impeach the president for "high crimes and misdemeanors"
  • Senate conducts the trial and can remove the president from office with a two-thirds majority vote

Federalist vs Anti-Federalist Arguments

Federalist Perspective

• Federalists argued that a strong national government was necessary to provide stability and promote economic prosperity
  • Believed a centralized government could effectively address national issues (taxation, defense)
  • Contended that a unified nation would be better equipped to negotiate with foreign powers
• Federalists believed that the separation of powers and checks and balances system would prevent tyranny
  • Legislative, executive, and judicial branches would have distinct roles and powers
  • Each branch could check the power of the others (veto power, judicial review), preventing any one branch from becoming too powerful
• Federalists contended that a bill of rights was unnecessary because the Constitution limited the powers of the national government
  • Argued that the Constitution's enumerated powers already protected individual rights
  • Believed that a bill of rights might imply that the government had more powers than explicitly granted

Anti-Federalist Perspective

• Anti-Federalists feared that the Constitution created a national government that was too powerful and would lead to tyranny
  • Worried that a strong central government would infringe upon state sovereignty and individual liberties
  • Believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the executive branch (president)
• Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution lacked sufficient protections for individual rights
  • Concerned that the absence of a bill of rights left citizens vulnerable to government oppression
  • Believed that explicit guarantees of rights (freedom of speech, religion) were necessary
• Anti-Federalists contended that the Constitution favored the interests of the wealthy elite
  • Argued that the centralized government would be controlled by aristocrats and bankers
  • Feared that the interests of common citizens would be overlooked in favor of the privileged class

Differing Views on Government Power and Individual Rights

• The debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists reflected differing views on the role and power of the national government
  • Federalists favored a strong central government to ensure stability and prosperity
  • Anti-Federalists advocated for a more limited national government to protect state and individual rights
• The relationship between the national government, states, and citizens was a central point of contention
  • Federalists believed the Constitution struck the right balance of power between levels of government
  • Anti-Federalists feared the national government would encroach upon state and individual sovereignty

Role of the Federalist Papers

Purpose and Authors

• The Federalist Papers were a series of 85 essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay
  • Hamilton, Madison, and Jay were prominent Federalists and advocates for the Constitution
  • Essays were written under the shared pseudonym "Publius" to present a unified voice
• The essays were published in New York newspapers between October 1787 and August 1788
  • New York was a crucial state in the ratification process, as it was a large and influential state
  • Essays aimed to persuade the people of New York to ratify the Constitution

Explanation and Defense of the Constitution

• The Federalist Papers provided a detailed explanation and defense of the Constitution
  • Essays addressed the structure, powers, and limitations of the proposed government
  • Authors argued that the Constitution created a government that was both effective and limited
• The Federalist Papers addressed concerns raised by Anti-Federalists
  • Essays responded to criticisms about the lack of a bill of rights and the potential for tyranny
  • Authors argued that the Constitution's system of checks and balances would prevent abuse of power

Influential Essays and Arguments

• Federalist No. 10, written by James Madison, addressed the issue of factions and how the Constitution would mitigate their effects
  • Madison argued that a large republic with a diverse population would prevent any one faction from dominating
  • Essay demonstrated how the Constitution's system of representation would protect against the tyranny of the majority
• Federalist No. 51, also written by Madison, explained the importance of checks and balances in preventing tyranny
  • Madison argued that the Constitution's separation of powers would prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful
  • Essay highlighted how the ambition of each branch would be used to check the others, ensuring a balance of power

Impact on Ratification

• The Federalist Papers played a crucial role in shaping public opinion and securing the ratification of the Constitution
  • Essays provided a comprehensive and persuasive argument in favor of the Constitution
  • Papers helped to alleviate concerns and build support for the new government
• The Federalist Papers were influential in the ratification process in New York and other states
  • New York ratified the Constitution in July 1788, with the Federalist Papers playing a significant role in the debate
  • Essays were widely reprinted and circulated, influencing the ratification debates in other states

Significance of Ratification

Ratification Process and Requirements

• The ratification process, as outlined in Article VII of the Constitution, required nine out of thirteen states to approve the Constitution for it to take effect
  • Ratification by nine states would establish the Constitution as the supreme law of the land
  • Remaining states could choose to join the new government or remain independent
• The state-by-state ratification process allowed for public debate and discussion of the Constitution
  • State ratifying conventions provided a forum for delegates to discuss the merits and drawbacks of the Constitution
  • Process encouraged a thorough examination of the Constitution and its implications for the nation

Demonstrating Widespread Support

• The Federalists' success in securing ratification in nine states by June 1788 demonstrated widespread support for the new government
  • Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey were the first states to ratify, all with unanimous or near-unanimous votes
  • Ratification by nine states in just nine months showed the strength of the Federalist arguments and the desire for a stronger national government
• The ratification of the Constitution by all thirteen states by May 1790 further established the legitimacy and authority of the new federal government
  • Rhode Island was the last state to ratify, highlighting the eventual consensus in favor of the Constitution
  • Unanimous ratification solidified the Constitution as the foundation of the United States government

Addressing Anti-Federalist Concerns

• The Bill of Rights, proposed as a compromise during the ratification process, helped to address Anti-Federalist concerns
  • Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York ratified the Constitution with the understanding that a bill of rights would be added
  • Federalists, including James Madison, agreed to support a bill of rights to secure ratification and unity
• The Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791, further solidified the legitimacy of the Constitution
  • Addition of explicit protections for individual rights addressed a major Anti-Federalist criticism
  • Incorporation of the Bill of Rights demonstrated the flexibility and responsiveness of the new government

Establishing Legitimacy and Authority

• The successful ratification of the Constitution established the legitimacy and authority of the new federal government
  • Widespread ratification demonstrated the consent of the governed and the will of the people
  • Constitution became the supreme law of the land, providing a stable framework for governance
• The ratification process set a precedent for the peaceful transfer of power and the establishment of new governments
  • Demonstrated that major political changes could be achieved through legal and constitutional means
  • Served as a model for future constitutional amendments and the admission of new states to the Union