Major treaties shaped Native American-U.S. relations, defining boundaries and rights. Early agreements like Fort Stanwix and Hopewell established precedents, while later treaties like Indian Removal Act led to forced relocations and land loss.
These treaties created a complex legal framework still debated today. Doctrines like Discovery and Reserved Rights continue to influence tribal sovereignty, resource rights, and federal responsibilities in ongoing negotiations and court cases.
Early Treaties
Foundational Agreements with Native Nations
Top images from around the web for Foundational Agreements with Native Nations Great Sioux Nation - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851) - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851) - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Great Sioux Nation - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851) - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Foundational Agreements with Native Nations Great Sioux Nation - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851) - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851) - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Great Sioux Nation - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Treaty of Fort Laramie (1851) - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Treaty of Fort Stanwix signed in 1768 between British and Iroquois Confederacy
Established boundary line between colonial settlements and Native American territories
Allowed colonists to settle lands east and south of the Ohio River
Iroquois received goods and promises of protection in exchange for land cessions
Treaty of Hopewell negotiated in 1785-1786 between United States and Cherokee , Choctaw , and Chickasaw nations
Defined boundaries between tribal lands and U.S. territory
Established trade relations and regulations
Promised peace and friendship between signatories
Included provisions for extradition of criminals across borders
Treaty of Fort Laramie signed in 1851 between United States and multiple Plains Indian nations
Aimed to reduce inter-tribal warfare and conflicts with white settlers
Defined territorial boundaries for participating tribes (Sioux , Cheyenne , Arapaho )
Granted right-of-way for roads and military posts through Indian lands
U.S. promised annuities and protection in exchange for safe passage of settlers
Impact and Significance of Early Treaties
Established precedent for formal nation-to-nation relationships
Created legal framework for future negotiations and land cessions
Often resulted in significant loss of Native American lands and resources
Frequently violated or reinterpreted by U.S. government to favor settler interests
Laid groundwork for later conflicts and treaty revisions (Fort Laramie Treaty of 1868)
Removal and Relocation
Indian Removal Act and Its Consequences
Indian Removal Act passed by Congress in 1830 under President Andrew Jackson
Authorized negotiation of treaties to exchange Native lands in eastern U.S. for lands west of Mississippi River
Resulted in forced relocation of Five Civilized Tribes (Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Muscogee, Seminole)
Led to infamous Trail of Tears , causing thousands of deaths due to disease, starvation, and exposure
Opened millions of acres for white settlement and expansion of slavery
Treaty of New Echota signed in 1835 between U.S. government and minority faction of Cherokee
Ceded all Cherokee lands east of Mississippi in exchange for lands in Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma)
Opposed by majority of Cherokee, including Principal Chief John Ross
Used as legal justification for forced removal of Cherokee in 1838
Resulted in deep divisions within Cherokee Nation and loss of ancestral homelands
Post-Civil War Treaties and Continued Displacement
Medicine Lodge Treaty comprised series of three treaties signed in 1867
Negotiated with Southern Plains tribes (Kiowa , Comanche , Plains Apache , Southern Cheyenne , Arapaho)
Aimed to end conflicts between tribes and white settlers on the Southern Plains
Established reservations in Indian Territory for participating tribes
Promised annuities, supplies, and education in exchange for land cessions
Ultimately failed to prevent further conflicts (Red River War of 1874-1875)
Continued pressure for Native land cessions and confinement to reservations
Breakdown of treaty system in favor of Congressional acts and executive orders
Allotment policy introduced by Dawes Act of 1887, further reducing tribal land base
Legal Doctrines
Foundational Principles in Federal Indian Law
Doctrine of Discovery originated from European colonial era
Asserted European nations' right to claim lands occupied by indigenous peoples
Incorporated into U.S. law through Supreme Court decisions (Johnson v. M'Intosh , 1823)
Established federal government as ultimate title holder of Native American lands
Limited tribal sovereignty and property rights
Canons of treaty construction developed by U.S. Supreme Court
Interpret treaties as Native Americans would have understood them at time of signing
Resolve ambiguities in favor of tribes
Liberal construction in favor of Native American rights
Applied in cases involving treaty rights and interpretation (Worcester v. Georgia , 1832)
Rights and Responsibilities in Tribal-Federal Relations
Reserved rights doctrine established through Supreme Court decisions
Recognizes tribes retain all rights not explicitly ceded in treaties
Applies to hunting, fishing, water rights, and other traditional practices
Exemplified in cases like Winters v. United States (1908) regarding water rights
Continues to influence modern legal disputes over natural resources and land use
Trust responsibility of federal government toward Native American tribes
Stems from treaty obligations and Supreme Court decisions
Requires government to act in best interests of tribes and protect tribal resources
Includes provision of services (healthcare, education) and protection of tribal lands
Often contested and reinterpreted in ongoing legal battles