5.3 Interception processes and modeling approaches

Interception is a crucial process in the hydrologic cycle, capturing precipitation before it reaches the ground. It affects water distribution in ecosystems, influencing soil moisture and runoff patterns. Understanding interception is key to grasping the full picture of water movement in nature.

Vegetation characteristics and weather conditions play major roles in determining interception rates. Factors like leaf area, canopy structure, rainfall intensity, and wind speed all impact how much water is intercepted. Models, both empirical and physical, help us estimate and predict interception in different environments.

Interception in the Hydrologic Cycle

The Role of Interception in the Water Balance

Top images from around the web for The Role of Interception in the Water Balance

• 

  GMD - WAYS v1: a hydrological model for root zone water storage simulation on a global scale View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  12. Surface Energy Balance and Evapotranspiration – Rain or Shine View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  HESS - Rainfall interception and redistribution by a common North American understory and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  GMD - WAYS v1: a hydrological model for root zone water storage simulation on a global scale View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  12. Surface Energy Balance and Evapotranspiration – Rain or Shine View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for The Role of Interception in the Water Balance

• 

  GMD - WAYS v1: a hydrological model for root zone water storage simulation on a global scale View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  12. Surface Energy Balance and Evapotranspiration – Rain or Shine View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  HESS - Rainfall interception and redistribution by a common North American understory and ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  GMD - WAYS v1: a hydrological model for root zone water storage simulation on a global scale View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  12. Surface Energy Balance and Evapotranspiration – Rain or Shine View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Interception is the process by which precipitation is captured and stored by vegetation canopy, stems, and branches before it reaches the ground surface
• Intercepted water can evaporate back into the atmosphere, reducing the amount of precipitation that reaches the ground and contributes to infiltration, runoff, and groundwater recharge
• Interception plays a significant role in the water balance of a catchment, particularly in forested areas where the canopy is dense and can intercept a substantial portion of the incoming precipitation (dense tropical rainforests)
• The partitioning of precipitation into interception, throughfall, and stemflow affects the spatial and temporal distribution of water within the ecosystem (soil moisture patterns)

Factors Influencing Interception Rates

• The interception process is influenced by the characteristics of the vegetation, such as leaf area index (LAI), canopy storage capacity, and canopy structure
  • Higher LAI values generally lead to increased interception rates (coniferous forests)
  • Canopy storage capacity determines the maximum amount of water that can be held by the vegetation (broadleaf trees)
• Meteorological conditions like precipitation intensity and duration, wind speed, and relative humidity also affect interception rates
  • High-intensity rainfall events can exceed the canopy storage capacity, resulting in more direct throughfall (tropical monsoons)
  • Wind can redistribute intercepted water within the canopy and enhance evaporation rates (coastal forests)

Factors Influencing Interception

Vegetation Characteristics

• Vegetation type and species composition affect interception rates due to differences in leaf area index (LAI), leaf morphology, and branch architecture
  • Coniferous forests generally have higher interception rates compared to deciduous forests due to their higher LAI and year-round foliage (spruce and fir forests)
  • Broad-leaved species with large leaf surfaces tend to intercept more water than narrow-leaved species (oak and maple trees)
• Canopy structure, including canopy density, vertical stratification, and gap fraction, influences the interception capacity and the spatial variability of throughfall
  • Dense canopies with multiple layers can intercept more water than sparse or single-layer canopies (tropical rainforests)
  • Canopy gaps allow more direct throughfall, reducing the overall interception (forest clearings)

Meteorological Conditions

• Meteorological conditions, such as precipitation intensity, duration, and frequency, affect the interception process and the partitioning of precipitation into interception, throughfall, and stemflow
  • High-intensity rainfall events tend to have lower interception rates due to the rapid saturation of the canopy storage capacity (thunderstorms)
  • Prolonged low-intensity events can result in higher interception losses as the canopy remains wet for longer periods (drizzle)
• Wind speed and direction influence the spatial distribution of intercepted water within the canopy and can lead to increased evaporation rates from wet canopies
  • Strong winds can shake water off the canopy, reducing interception (coastal storms)
  • Sheltered areas within the canopy may have higher interception rates due to reduced wind effects (forest interior)
• Relative humidity and temperature affect the evaporation rate of intercepted water, with higher evaporation rates occurring under drier and warmer conditions
  • Low relative humidity and high temperatures promote faster evaporation of intercepted water (arid regions)
  • High relative humidity and cool temperatures slow down the evaporation process (fog-prone areas)

Interception Models: Empirical vs Physically-Based

Empirical Interception Models

• Empirical interception models, such as the Gash model and the Rutter model, are based on statistical relationships derived from field observations and measurements
  • These models often use regression equations to relate interception loss to meteorological variables and canopy characteristics (rainfall intensity and LAI)
  • Empirical models are relatively simple to implement and require fewer input parameters compared to physically-based models
  • The Gash model, for example, uses a series of equations to estimate interception loss based on canopy storage capacity, mean evaporation rate, and mean rainfall rate
• However, empirical models may have limited transferability to different ecosystems or climatic conditions beyond those for which they were developed
  • Models developed for temperate forests may not accurately represent interception processes in tropical or arid regions
  • Changes in vegetation structure or climate over time may reduce the validity of empirical relationships

Physically-Based Interception Models

• Physically-based interception models, such as the Rutter-Sparse model and the Mulder model, aim to represent the physical processes involved in interception, such as canopy storage, drip, and evaporation
  • These models often use a water balance approach, considering the partitioning of precipitation into interception, throughfall, and stemflow
  • The Rutter-Sparse model, for instance, uses a series of equations to represent the change in canopy storage, drip, and evaporation over time, considering the precipitation input and the canopy characteristics
• Physically-based models require detailed input data on canopy structure, meteorological conditions, and evaporation rates
  • Canopy structure data may include leaf area density, canopy height, and gap fraction (LiDAR measurements)
  • Meteorological data such as precipitation, wind speed, relative humidity, and temperature are necessary inputs (weather stations)
• While more complex than empirical models, physically-based models can provide a more mechanistic understanding of the interception process and may be more adaptable to different ecosystems and climatic conditions
  • These models can account for the spatial and temporal variability of interception processes within the canopy (vertical profiles)
  • Physically-based models can be coupled with other hydrological models to represent the full water balance of a catchment (integrated modeling frameworks)

Model Selection and Comparison

• Both empirical and physically-based models have their strengths and limitations, and the choice of model depends on the available data, the scale of the study, and the specific research questions being addressed
  • Empirical models may be suitable for studies with limited data availability or for quick assessments of interception loss (regional-scale studies)
  • Physically-based models may be preferred when a more detailed understanding of the interception process is required or when investigating the effects of land cover changes (plot-scale studies)
• Comparing the performance of different interception models can provide insights into their suitability for a given ecosystem or climatic condition
  • Model validation using field measurements of throughfall, stemflow, and interception loss can help assess the accuracy and reliability of the models (lysimeter measurements)
  • Sensitivity analyses can identify the key parameters and input variables that influence model predictions (canopy storage capacity and precipitation intensity)

Applying Interception Models for Water Balance

Data Requirements and Model Setup

• To apply interception models, gather the necessary input data, such as meteorological variables (precipitation, wind speed, relative humidity, and temperature), canopy characteristics (LAI, canopy storage capacity, and canopy structure), and evaporation rates
  • Meteorological data can be obtained from weather stations or gridded climate datasets (ERA5 reanalysis)
  • Canopy characteristics can be derived from field measurements, remote sensing data, or literature values (LAI from satellite imagery)
• For empirical models, use the appropriate regression equations or look-up tables to estimate interception loss based on the input variables
  • The Gash model, for example, requires the canopy storage capacity, the mean evaporation rate during rainfall, and the mean rainfall rate to estimate interception loss
  • Parameterize the model using site-specific data or values from similar ecosystems (literature review)
• For physically-based models, set up the water balance equations and solve them numerically or analytically to estimate interception loss, throughfall, and stemflow
  • The Rutter-Sparse model, for instance, uses a series of equations to represent the change in canopy storage, drip, and evaporation over time, considering the precipitation input and the canopy characteristics
  • Discretize the canopy into layers and time steps to represent the vertical and temporal variability of interception processes (hourly time steps and 1-meter layers)

Model Validation and Application

• Validate the interception model results using field measurements of throughfall, stemflow, and interception loss, if available, to assess the model's performance and accuracy
  • Compare modeled and measured values using statistical metrics such as root mean square error (RMSE) and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE)
  • Identify potential sources of uncertainty and error in the model predictions (measurement errors and parameter uncertainty)
• Incorporate the estimated interception loss into the overall water balance of the catchment, considering other components such as infiltration, runoff, and evapotranspiration
  • Couple the interception model with soil moisture and groundwater models to represent the full hydrological cycle (integrated hydrological modeling)
  • Assess the relative importance of interception loss in the water balance and its potential impact on streamflow, soil moisture, and groundwater recharge (water budget analysis)
• Use the interception model results to investigate the spatial and temporal variability of interception loss within the study area and to evaluate the potential effects of land cover changes or management practices on the hydrologic cycle
  • Map the spatial distribution of interception loss using the model outputs and compare it with land cover patterns (GIS analysis)
  • Simulate the effects of deforestation, afforestation, or changes in tree species composition on interception loss and the water balance (scenario analysis)
  • Evaluate the potential of interception loss to mitigate or exacerbate the impacts of extreme events such as droughts or floods (climate change impact assessment)