8.3 Hydrograph analysis and separation techniques

Hydrograph analysis is crucial for understanding how watersheds respond to rainfall events. It involves separating baseflow from direct runoff and calculating key metrics like runoff volume and peak discharge. These techniques help hydrologists assess flood risks and manage water resources effectively.

Different methods for hydrograph separation, such as constant discharge, constant slope, and concave methods, each have their strengths and limitations. Comparing these approaches can provide valuable insights into watershed behavior and help in selecting the most appropriate method for specific analysis goals.

Hydrograph Analysis

Graphical baseflow separation methods

Top images from around the web for Graphical baseflow separation methods

• 

  HESS - Technical note: Calculation scripts for ensemble hydrograph separation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  HESS - Can the two-parameter recursive digital filter baseflow separation method really be ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  HESS - A novel method for cold-region streamflow hydrograph separation using GRACE satellite ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  HESS - Technical note: Calculation scripts for ensemble hydrograph separation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  HESS - Can the two-parameter recursive digital filter baseflow separation method really be ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Graphical baseflow separation methods

• 

  HESS - Technical note: Calculation scripts for ensemble hydrograph separation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  HESS - Can the two-parameter recursive digital filter baseflow separation method really be ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  HESS - A novel method for cold-region streamflow hydrograph separation using GRACE satellite ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  HESS - Technical note: Calculation scripts for ensemble hydrograph separation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  HESS - Can the two-parameter recursive digital filter baseflow separation method really be ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Constant discharge method assumes baseflow remains constant throughout the hydrograph event
  • Draws a horizontal line from the start of the rising limb to the point where the falling limb reaches the same discharge value (pre-event baseflow level)
  • Simplifies the baseflow contribution but may not accurately represent the gradual changes in baseflow
• Constant slope method assumes baseflow increases linearly from the start of the rising limb to the inflection point on the falling limb
  • Draws a straight line from the start of the rising limb to the inflection point, which is the point where the slope of the falling limb changes ($\frac{d^2Q}{dt^2} = 0$)
  • Accounts for the gradual increase in baseflow but the selection of the inflection point can be subjective
• Concave method assumes baseflow recession follows a concave curve, typically exponential or logarithmic
  • Extends the baseflow recession curve from before the rising limb to intersect with the falling limb
  • Represents the natural decay of baseflow but the shape of the recession curve can be influenced by factors like groundwater storage and geology

Hydrograph data calculations

• Runoff volume represents the total volume of water discharged during the hydrograph event
  • Calculated by integrating the area under the hydrograph curve ($V = \int_{t_1}^{t_2} Q(t) dt$)
  • Expressed in units of volume (m³ or ft³) and provides insights into the total water yield from the watershed
• Peak discharge is the maximum discharge value observed on the hydrograph
  • Indicates the highest flow rate during the event and is important for flood risk assessment
  • Influenced by factors such as precipitation intensity, watershed size, and land use (urbanization tends to increase peak discharge)
• Time to peak is the time elapsed from the start of the rising limb to the occurrence of the peak discharge
  • Represents the response time of the watershed to the precipitation event
  • Shorter time to peak indicates a more rapid response and can be associated with smaller, steeper watersheds or impervious surfaces (concrete or asphalt)

Hydrograph Separation Techniques

Limitations of separation techniques

• Constant discharge method assumes baseflow remains constant, which may not be realistic in many cases
  • Does not account for the gradual increase in baseflow during the rising limb due to increased groundwater recharge
  • May overestimate direct runoff and underestimate baseflow contributions
• Constant slope method assumes a linear increase in baseflow, which is a simplification of the actual baseflow response
  • The selection of the inflection point on the falling limb can be subjective and affect the separation results
  • May not accurately capture the non-linear nature of baseflow recession in some watersheds
• Concave method assumes baseflow recession follows a concave curve, but the shape can vary depending on watershed characteristics
  • The shape of the baseflow recession curve can be influenced by factors such as geology, soil properties, and groundwater storage (karst systems may exhibit more rapid recession)
  • Requires fitting a mathematical function to the recession curve, which introduces additional uncertainties

Comparison of separation methods

• Different separation methods can yield varying estimates of baseflow and direct runoff contributions
  • Constant discharge method may overestimate direct runoff and underestimate baseflow compared to other methods
  • Constant slope method may provide a more balanced estimate of baseflow and direct runoff but is sensitive to the inflection point selection
  • Concave method may attribute more flow to baseflow and less to direct runoff, especially in watersheds with slow groundwater response
• The choice of separation method can impact the estimation of runoff volume and peak discharge
  • Overestimating direct runoff may lead to higher estimated runoff volumes and peak discharges, which can affect flood risk assessment and infrastructure design
  • Underestimating direct runoff may result in lower estimated runoff volumes and peak discharges, potentially impacting water resource management decisions
• The selection of an appropriate separation method depends on the characteristics of the watershed and the purpose of the analysis
  • Factors such as geology (bedrock type), land use (agricultural vs. urban), and precipitation patterns (intensity and duration) should be considered
  • The chosen method should align with the objectives of the study, such as flood risk assessment, water quality modeling, or groundwater recharge estimation
  • Comparing results from multiple separation methods can provide a range of estimates and help assess the uncertainty associated with the separation process