11.3 Brahman, Atman, and their relationship in Advaita Vedanta

Advaita Vedanta explores the relationship between Brahman (ultimate reality) and Atman (individual self). It argues that these are fundamentally one, despite appearances. The philosophy challenges our usual ideas about reality and ourselves.

Understanding this connection is key to grasping Advaita Vedanta. It impacts how we see the world, ourselves, and our actions. This idea of oneness has big implications for how we live and think about life.

Brahman and Atman in Advaita Vedanta

Fundamental Concepts

Top images from around the web for Fundamental Concepts

• 

  LA CIENCIA DE LOS SABIOS: LA FILOSOFÍA ADVAITA DE SRI SANKARA por Swami Sivananda View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Eastern philosophy - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  LA CIENCIA DE LOS SABIOS: LA FILOSOFÍA ADVAITA DE SRI SANKARA por Swami Sivananda View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Eastern philosophy - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Fundamental Concepts

• 

  LA CIENCIA DE LOS SABIOS: LA FILOSOFÍA ADVAITA DE SRI SANKARA por Swami Sivananda View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Eastern philosophy - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  LA CIENCIA DE LOS SABIOS: LA FILOSOFÍA ADVAITA DE SRI SANKARA por Swami Sivananda View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Eastern philosophy - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Brahman embodies ultimate, absolute reality characterized as infinite, eternal, and unchanging
  • Described as sat-chit-ananda (existence-consciousness-bliss)
  • Considered nirguna (without attributes)
• Atman represents individual self or soul constituting essence of an individual's being
  • Manifestation of Brahman in individual entities
  • Not separate from Brahman in Advaita Vedanta
• Maya creates illusory perception of multiplicity and difference in the world
  • Crucial for understanding apparent distinction between Brahman and Atman
  • Power that veils true nature of reality

Sources and Philosophical Methods

• Upanishads provide primary sources for Advaitic understanding
  • Mandukya Upanishad contains key statements
    • "Tat Tvam Asi" (That Thou Art)
    • "Aham Brahmasmi" (I am Brahman)
• Advaita Vedanta employs various reasoning and analysis methods
  • Adhyaropa-apavada (superimposition and negation) elucidates nature of Brahman and Atman
  • Helps distinguish between ultimate reality and apparent phenomena

Ignorance and Perception

• Ignorance (avidya) causes perception of Atman as separate from Brahman
  • Root cause of false identification of self with body, mind, and ego
  • Leads to misunderstanding of true nature of reality
• Overcoming ignorance reveals essential unity of Brahman and Atman
  • Achieved through spiritual practices and self-inquiry
  • Results in realization of non-dual nature of existence

Brahman-Atman Relationship in Advaita

Non-Duality Principle

• Fundamental tenet asserts identity of Atman and Brahman
  • Not merely similar or part of Brahman
  • Essential oneness despite apparent differences
• Analogies illustrate Brahman-Atman relationship
  • Wave and ocean (individual soul and universal consciousness)
  • Pot space and total space (limited awareness and infinite awareness)

Levels of Reality

• Advaita philosophy employs three levels of reality
  • Paramarthika (absolute): ultimate non-dual reality of Brahman
  • Vyavaharika (empirical): everyday world of apparent multiplicity
  • Pratibhasika (illusory): false perceptions like mirages or dreams
• Levels explain perceived difference between Brahman and Atman
  • Differentiation exists only in lower levels of reality
  • Ultimate reality transcends all distinctions

Philosophical Doctrines

• Ajativada propounded by Gaudapada
  • States no real creation or dissolution
  • Emphasizes non-dual nature of Brahman and Atman
• Vivartavada theory by Shankara
  • Explains world as apparent modification of Brahman
  • Similar to mistaking rope for snake (rope-snake analogy)
  • Reinforces idea that Atman is not truly separate from Brahman

Liberation and Realization

• Jivanmukti (liberation while living) based on Brahman-Atman identity realization
  • Practical implication of understanding true nature of self
  • Attainable through knowledge and self-inquiry
• Moksha redefined as recognition of one's true nature as Brahman
  • Not a state to be achieved or place to reach
  • Involves removal of ignorance obscuring true identity

Implications of Brahman-Atman Identity

Ontological and Epistemological Consequences

• Challenges conventional notions of individuality and personal identity
  • Suggests ego-self as ultimately illusory
  • Redefines nature of consciousness and awareness
• Implies non-dual nature of ultimate reality
  • Leads to reassessment of ontological status of phenomenal world
  • Questions validity of individual experiences as separate from universal consciousness

Ethical and Practical Implications

• Fosters sense of universal oneness and compassion
  • All beings seen as manifestations of same ultimate reality
  • Encourages ethical behavior based on recognition of shared essence
• Influences Advaitic approach to spiritual practices
  • Emphasizes knowledge (jnana) and self-inquiry
  • De-emphasizes ritualistic or devotional practices
• Challenges traditional understanding of karma and rebirth
  • Views them as part of illusory realm of maya
  • Reinterprets their significance in light of non-dual reality

Philosophical Debates and Criticisms

• Critics argue absolute non-dualism may lead to denial of world's reality
  • Potential for ethical nihilism
  • Questions practical implications for everyday life
• Advaitins develop sophisticated responses to challenges
  • Explain ethical behavior as natural outcome of self-realization
  • Argue for provisional reality of world while maintaining ultimate non-duality
• Ongoing debates within Indian philosophy
  • Competing schools (Dvaita, Vishishtadvaita) offer alternative interpretations
  • Discussions refine and clarify Advaitic concepts over time