12.1 Parallels and differences in metaphysical concepts

Indian and Western philosophies offer contrasting views on reality and existence. While Indian thought emphasizes non-dualism and interconnectedness, Western philosophy maintains subject-object distinctions and focuses on individual entities.

Time, perception, and the nature of self are understood differently in these traditions. Indian philosophy sees time as cyclical and questions sensory experience, while Western thought views time linearly and generally trusts sense perception as a knowledge source.

Metaphysical Concepts in Indian vs Western Thought

Fundamental Principles and Ultimate Reality

Top images from around the web for Fundamental Principles and Ultimate Reality

• 

  Brahma - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Self in Indian Philosophy: Hindu, Buddhist and Carvaka views View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Karma, Dharma and Moksha: Interpreting Indian philosophy View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Brahma - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Self in Indian Philosophy: Hindu, Buddhist and Carvaka views View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Fundamental Principles and Ultimate Reality

• 

  Brahma - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Self in Indian Philosophy: Hindu, Buddhist and Carvaka views View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Karma, Dharma and Moksha: Interpreting Indian philosophy View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Brahma - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Self in Indian Philosophy: Hindu, Buddhist and Carvaka views View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Brahman represents ultimate reality or absolute truth in Indian philosophy
  • Comparable to Western concepts (God, Being, Prime Mover)
• Atman refers to individual self or soul in Indian philosophy
  • Similar to Western notions of soul or consciousness
• Maya describes illusory nature of material world in Indian thought
  • Western traditions grapple with nature of reality and appearance
• Karma and rebirth doctrine in Indian philosophy
  • Contrasts with Western concepts of free will and linear time
• Causality differs between traditions
  • Indian philosophy emphasizes cyclical patterns and interdependence
  • Western thought focuses on linear cause-effect relationships

Mind, Body, and Existence

• Western metaphysics explores mind-body problem
  • Indian philosophy views consciousness as more fundamental than matter
• Both traditions examine nature of existence from different perspectives
  • Indian concept of sat (being)
  • Western notion of essence
• Substance in Western metaphysics
  • Contrasts with Indian notions of impermanence and emptiness (sunyata) in Buddhist thought
• Western philosophy seeks objective truths about reality
  • Indian philosophy emphasizes subjective experience and limitations of conceptual knowledge

Reality and Existence: Indian vs Western Perspectives

Dualism vs Non-Dualism

• Indian philosophy often views reality as non-dual (advaita)
  • Emphasizes interconnectedness of all things
• Western philosophy maintains subject-object distinction
  • Focuses on individual entities and their properties
• Levels of reality in Indian thought
  • Vyavaharika (empirical reality) and paramarthika (absolute reality) in Advaita Vedanta
  • Contrasts with Western tendencies towards unified conception of reality

Time and Perception

• Nature of time conceived differently
  • Indian thought views time as cyclical (yugas, kalpas)
  • Western thought typically sees time as linear (past, present, future)
• Role of perception in understanding reality differs
  • Indian philosophy questions reliability of sensory experience more radically
  • Western traditions generally trust sense perception as source of knowledge
• Both traditions explore relationship between individual and cosmos
  • Indian philosophy emphasizes ultimate unity (Tat Tvam Asi - "You are That")
  • Western thought maintains greater distinction between individual and universe

Self, Consciousness, and the Universe: Similarities and Differences

Concepts of Self and Consciousness

• Indian concept of atman as true self
  • Differs from Western notions of personal identity (continuity of consciousness, bodily existence)
• Consciousness in Indian philosophy seen as fundamental and all-pervading
  • Western traditions view it as emergent property or localized phenomenon
• Non-self (anatman) in Buddhist philosophy
  • Challenges both Indian and Western notions of permanent, unchanging self
• Indian philosophy views universe as inherently conscious
  • Western thought typically separates consciousness from material world

Nature of the Universe

• Indian thought involves cycles of creation and destruction
  • Concept of kalpa (cosmic cycle lasting billions of years)
• Western models propose linear cosmic evolution
  • Big Bang theory, heat death of universe
• Both traditions grapple with nature of causality in universe
  • Indian philosophy emphasizes interdependence and conditioned arising (pratityasamutpada)
  • Western thought focuses on linear causality (cause precedes effect)
• Indian philosophy often sees universe as manifestation of consciousness
  • Western cosmology typically views universe as primarily physical

Metaphysical Differences and Philosophical Development

Influence on Philosophical Inquiry

• Non-dual metaphysics in Indian traditions
  • Led to development of meditation and yoga schools
• Western dualism influenced mind-body problem in philosophy of mind
  • Cartesian dualism, physicalism, property dualism
• Indian emphasis on cyclical time and rebirth
  • Fostered investigations into karma and ethics across lifetimes
• Western focus on single-life ethical frameworks
  • Virtue ethics, deontology, consequentialism

Epistemology and Ontology

• Maya concept in Indian thought
  • Led to sophisticated epistemological inquiries about nature of knowledge and illusion
• Western traditions focused on establishing criteria for objective knowledge
  • Empiricism, rationalism, scientific method
• Western metaphysical emphasis on substance
  • Influenced development of scientific materialism
• Indian views on primacy of consciousness
  • Fostered different approaches to understanding reality (Yogacara, Kashmir Shaivism)
• Indian concept of multiple levels of reality
  • Led to development of complex ontological systems
• Western thought tended towards more unified ontological frameworks
  • Monism, pluralism, materialism