14.3 Framing contests and public opinion formation

Framing contests shape how we understand issues. Interest groups and social movements strategically frame topics to gain support, while media amplifies or challenges these frames. The battle of ideas influences public perception and policy outcomes.

Successful frames resonate with cultural values and tap into shared emotions. Media plays a crucial role in spreading frames, but social media has democratized the process. Framing impacts public opinion by influencing how people think about issues and evaluate solutions.

Framing and Public Discourse

Defining Framing

Top images from around the web for Defining Framing

• 

  Effects of Social Movements on Politics – Youth Voices View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Public Opinion: How is it formed? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Manageable Micro-Framing – Open at Scale: Project Guidelines View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Effects of Social Movements on Politics – Youth Voices View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Public Opinion: How is it formed? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Defining Framing

• 

  Effects of Social Movements on Politics – Youth Voices View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Public Opinion: How is it formed? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Manageable Micro-Framing – Open at Scale: Project Guidelines View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Effects of Social Movements on Politics – Youth Voices View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Public Opinion: How is it formed? | United States Government View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Framing selects and emphasizes certain aspects of an issue or event to promote a particular interpretation or understanding
• Frames serve as cognitive shortcuts that help individuals make sense of complex issues by highlighting some aspects while downplaying others (political debates, media coverage)
• Framing influences how people perceive the causes, consequences, and solutions to social and political problems (poverty, immigration, climate change)
• Frames are often embedded in language, images, and narratives used by various actors, such as politicians, interest groups, and media outlets (campaign slogans, news articles, social media posts)

Implications of Framing

• The way an issue is framed can have significant implications for public opinion, political mobilization, and policy outcomes
• Framing shapes how people think about an issue, attribute responsibility, and evaluate policy options (healthcare reform, gun control)
• Frames that resonate with individuals' values, beliefs, and experiences are more likely to be accepted and internalized, leading to attitude formation and change
• Dominant frames can limit the range of policy options considered by policymakers and shape the terms of political debate (war on drugs, war on terror)

Framing Contests

Strategic Framing by Interest Groups and Social Movements

• Interest groups and social movements strategically frame issues to advance their goals and mobilize support for their causes (environmental groups, gun rights advocates)
• They use various framing techniques, such as problem definition, causal attribution, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation, to present issues in a way that resonates with their target audiences
• Competing frames often reflect different values, beliefs, and ideologies of the groups involved in the framing contest (pro-choice vs. pro-life, gun rights vs. gun control)
• Interest groups and social movements may employ counter-framing strategies to challenge and reframe dominant narratives promoted by their opponents (Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter)

Factors Influencing Frame Success

• The success of a frame depends on its resonance with existing cultural values, political ideologies, and personal experiences of the target audience
• Frames that align with widely held beliefs, tap into shared emotions, and offer compelling narratives are more likely to gain traction (American Dream, war on terror)
• Framing contests are shaped by the resources, credibility, and strategic acumen of the actors involved (well-funded interest groups, charismatic leaders)
• The political and media environment, including the salience of the issue and the presence of competing frames, can influence the outcome of framing contests (economic crisis, natural disasters)

Media's Role in Framing

Media as Frame Amplifiers and Challengers

• Media plays a crucial role in disseminating and legitimizing certain frames while marginalizing others
• Journalists and editors make choices about which aspects of an issue to emphasize, which sources to cite, and how to present information, thereby contributing to the framing process (front-page coverage, expert interviews)
• Media frames can be influenced by various factors, such as journalistic norms, organizational constraints, political leanings, and market pressures (objectivity, editorial bias, audience preferences)
• Social media platforms have democratized the framing process by allowing a wider range of actors to participate in framing contests and challenge dominant narratives (Twitter hashtags, viral videos)

Frame-Breaking and Alternative Perspectives

• Media can also engage in frame-breaking by introducing alternative perspectives and challenging taken-for-granted assumptions about an issue
• Investigative journalism, op-eds, and documentaries can shed light on underreported aspects of an issue and offer counter-narratives to dominant frames (exposing corporate wrongdoing, highlighting marginalized voices)
• Media outlets with different ideological leanings may present competing frames on the same issue, exposing audiences to a range of perspectives (Fox News vs. MSNBC)
• The rise of independent media and citizen journalism has created new opportunities for frame-breaking and the amplification of alternative viewpoints (blogs, podcasts, YouTube channels)

Framing's Impact on Opinion and Policy

Shaping Public Opinion

• Framing contests can shape public opinion by influencing how people think about an issue, attribute responsibility, and evaluate policy options
• Frames that resonate with individuals' values, beliefs, and experiences are more likely to be accepted and internalized, leading to attitude formation and change (environmentalism, marriage equality)
• Dominant frames can limit the range of policy options considered by policymakers and shape the terms of political debate (tough-on-crime policies, free market solutions)
• Successful framing can mobilize public support for or against a particular policy proposal, influencing its chances of adoption and implementation (Affordable Care Act, Paris Climate Agreement)

Moderating Factors and Contextual Influences

• Framing effects can be moderated by individual-level factors, such as political knowledge, ideology, and personal experience (partisan polarization, issue expertise)
• Contextual factors, such as the salience of the issue and the presence of competing frames, can influence the impact of framing on public opinion and policy outcomes (economic recessions, national security threats)
• The effectiveness of framing may vary across different segments of the population, depending on their predispositions, media consumption habits, and social networks (urban vs. rural, young vs. old)
• The long-term impact of framing on public opinion and policy may depend on the sustained efforts of actors to maintain and adapt their frames in response to changing circumstances (evolving social norms, new scientific evidence)