4.4 Price discrimination

Price discrimination lets firms charge different prices to different customers for the same product. It's a key strategy for monopolies and firms with market power to maximize profits by capturing more consumer surplus.

There are three main types: first-degree (perfect), second-degree (quantity-based), and third-degree (group-based). Each type has unique conditions and impacts on profits, consumer welfare, and market efficiency. Understanding these is crucial for analyzing monopoly behavior.

Price discrimination: Definition and Forms

Types of Price Discrimination

Top images from around the web for Types of Price Discrimination

• 

  Principles of Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Price Discrimination | Boundless Economics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Price Discrimination and Efficiency | Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Principles of Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Price Discrimination | Boundless Economics View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Types of Price Discrimination

• 

  Principles of Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Price Discrimination | Boundless Economics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Price Discrimination and Efficiency | Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Principles of Microeconomics View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Price Discrimination | Boundless Economics View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Price discrimination charges different prices to different consumers for the same or similar product based on their willingness to pay
• First-degree price discrimination charges each consumer their maximum willingness to pay capturing the entire consumer surplus
• Second-degree price discrimination offers different prices based on quantity purchased through bulk discounts or non-linear pricing schemes
• Third-degree price discrimination segments consumers into distinct groups charging different prices to each group based on their perceived elasticity of demand
• Two-part tariffs require consumers to pay a fixed fee for access to a product or service plus a per-unit charge for consumption
• Intertemporal price discrimination charges different prices for the same product at different times capturing consumers with varying time preferences or urgency of need

Examples of Price Discrimination

• First-degree (haggling at a flea market)
• Second-degree (mobile phone plans with different data allowances)
• Third-degree (student discounts for movie tickets)
• Two-part tariffs (gym memberships with monthly fee plus per-class charges)
• Intertemporal (early bird discounts for concert tickets)

Conditions for Price Discrimination

Market Power and Consumer Segmentation

• Firms must have market power or monopolistic control to set prices above marginal cost
• Firms must identify and segment consumers based on willingness to pay or demand elasticity
• Limited arbitrage opportunities prevent consumers from reselling the product to other segments
• Firms must prevent or limit resale between consumer groups through legal technological or geographical barriers
• Consumer preferences and willingness to pay must be sufficiently diverse to make price discrimination profitable
• Firms need access to information about consumer preferences and purchasing behaviors for effective implementation

Cost-Benefit Analysis

• Costs of implementing and maintaining price discrimination strategy must not exceed additional revenue generated
• Firms must analyze potential benefits against implementation costs (market research customer segmentation systems)
• Evaluation of long-term sustainability of price discrimination strategy in face of potential market changes or competitor responses

Impact of Price Discrimination on Profits and Welfare

Effects on Firm Profits

• Price discrimination generally increases firm profits by capturing more consumer surplus compared to uniform pricing
• Perfect price discrimination (first-degree) maximizes producer surplus but eliminates all consumer surplus
• Second-degree price discrimination can increase producer surplus by serving previously excluded consumers
• Third-degree price discrimination allows firms to extract more surplus from less price-sensitive consumer segments

Consumer Welfare Effects

• Consumer welfare effects vary depending on type of price discrimination and market structure
• Some consumers benefit from lower prices while others face higher prices
• Total consumer surplus may increase or decrease depending on specific pricing strategy and market conditions
• Second-degree price discrimination can increase consumer surplus by offering more choices and potentially lower prices for some consumers
• Third-degree price discrimination typically benefits consumers with more elastic demand while potentially harming those with less elastic demand
• Price discrimination can lead to increased market coverage serving consumers who would otherwise be priced out of the market under uniform pricing

Efficiency Implications of Price Discrimination

Market Structure Considerations

• In monopoly markets price discrimination can increase total economic surplus by reducing deadweight loss associated with uniform monopoly pricing
• Perfect price discrimination (first-degree) achieves allocative efficiency by producing socially optimal quantity but raises equity concerns due to complete extraction of consumer surplus
• In oligopolistic markets efficiency implications of price discrimination are more complex depending on nature of competition and strategic interactions between firms
• Price discrimination can lead to more efficient resource allocation by aligning prices more closely with individual consumers' marginal willingness to pay

Long-term Efficiency Impacts

• Price discrimination can enable production of goods or services unprofitable under uniform pricing potentially increasing social welfare
• Efficiency gains from price discrimination must be weighed against potential costs (increased market power reduced innovation incentives negative externalities)
• Dynamic efficiency considerations include impact of price discrimination on long-term investment innovation and market structure evolution
• Price discrimination may affect market entry barriers and competitive landscape in the long run