International accounting standards provide a common language for global business, enabling companies to communicate financial information across borders. For SMEs in international consulting, understanding these standards is crucial for credibility, attracting foreign investment, and facilitating cross-border transactions.
Key organizations like the IASB and FASB develop global and US standards respectively. The oversees the IASB, promoting worldwide adoption of . Core principles include relevance, faithful representation, and comparability of financial information.
Overview of international accounting standards
International accounting standards provide a common global language for business affairs, enabling companies to communicate and compare financial information across international boundaries
Adopting a single set of worldwide standards helps improve the consistency, comparability, and efficiency of financial reporting, which benefits investors, auditors, and other stakeholders in the global economy
For small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) engaged in international consulting, understanding and complying with international accounting standards is crucial for establishing credibility, attracting foreign investment, and facilitating cross-border transactions
Key organizations in international accounting
IASB vs FASB
Top images from around the web for IASB vs FASB
Journal of Accounting and Taxation - factors influencing international financial reporting ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Measuring the “Adoption” of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) View original
Is this image relevant?
Journal of Accounting and Taxation - factors influencing international financial reporting ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Journal of Accounting and Taxation - factors influencing international financial reporting ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Measuring the “Adoption” of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for IASB vs FASB
Journal of Accounting and Taxation - factors influencing international financial reporting ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Measuring the “Adoption” of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) View original
Is this image relevant?
Journal of Accounting and Taxation - factors influencing international financial reporting ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Journal of Accounting and Taxation - factors influencing international financial reporting ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Measuring the “Adoption” of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
The is an independent, private-sector body that develops and approves International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
The is the organization responsible for establishing generally accepted accounting principles () in the United States
While both organizations aim to improve financial reporting quality, the IASB focuses on global standards (IFRS), while the FASB focuses on US standards (US GAAP)
Role of IFRS Foundation
The IFRS Foundation is a not-for-profit, public interest organization established to develop a single set of high-quality, understandable, enforceable, and globally accepted accounting standards (IFRS)
The Foundation oversees the IASB and is responsible for its governance, funding, and oversight
It also engages with stakeholders around the world to promote the adoption and consistent application of IFRS
Core principles of IFRS
Qualitative characteristics of financial information
Relevance: Information must be capable of making a difference in users' decisions
Faithful representation: Information must be complete, neutral, and free from error
Comparability: Users must be able to compare financial statements across entities and over time
Verifiability: Different knowledgeable and independent observers should reach consensus that information is faithfully represented
Timeliness: Information must be available to decision-makers in time to be capable of influencing their decisions
Understandability: Information should be presented clearly and concisely
Underlying assumptions
Accrual basis: Transactions are recognized when they occur, not when cash is received or paid
Going concern: Financial statements are prepared on the assumption that an entity will continue in operation for the foreseeable future
Major IFRS standards
Presentation of financial statements (IAS 1)
Sets out overall requirements for the presentation of financial statements, guidelines for their structure, and minimum content requirements
Requires a complete set of financial statements to include a , statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, , , and notes
Inventories (IAS 2)
Prescribes the accounting treatment for inventories, including cost determination and expense recognition
Requires inventories to be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value (NRV)
Cost includes all costs of purchase, conversion, and other costs incurred in bringing inventories to their present location and condition
Expense recognition occurs when inventories are sold, exchanged, or distributed
Statement of cash flows (IAS 7)
Requires entities to present a statement of cash flows that reports cash inflows and outflows during a period, classified into operating, investing, and financing activities
Operating activities include the principal revenue-producing activities of the entity and other activities that are not investing or financing
Investing activities include the acquisition and disposal of long-term assets and other investments not included in cash equivalents
Financing activities include activities that result in changes in the size and composition of the contributed equity and borrowings of the entity
Property, plant and equipment (IAS 16)
Prescribes the accounting treatment for property, plant, and equipment (PPE) so that users can discern information about an entity's investment in its PPE and the changes in such investment
PPE are tangible items held for use in the production or supply of goods or services, for rental to others, or for administrative purposes, and are expected to be used during more than one period
Initial measurement is at cost, which includes the purchase price, any directly attributable costs of bringing the asset to working condition, and the initial estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing the item and restoring the site
Subsequent measurement can follow either the cost model (cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses) or the revaluation model (fair value at revaluation date less subsequent depreciation and impairment losses)
Leases (IFRS 16)
Establishes principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of leases
Requires lessees to recognize most leases on their balance sheets as lease liabilities with corresponding right-of-use assets
Lessor accounting remains similar to the previous standard (IAS 17), classifying leases as operating or finance
For operating leases, lessors continue to recognize the underlying asset; for finance leases, lessors derecognize the underlying asset and recognize a net investment in the lease
Revenue from contracts with customers (IFRS 15)
Establishes a comprehensive framework for determining whether, how much, and when revenue is recognized
Applies to all contracts with customers, except leases, financial instruments, and insurance contracts
Introduces a five-step model for :
Identify the contract with a customer
Identify the performance obligations in the contract
Determine the transaction price
Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations
Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation
Differences between IFRS and US GAAP
Conceptual framework comparison
Both IFRS and US GAAP aim to provide useful financial information to investors and creditors, but there are differences in their conceptual frameworks
IFRS places more emphasis on principles than rules, while US GAAP tends to be more rules-based
IFRS emphasizes the importance of the balance sheet, while US GAAP focuses more on the income statement
Key accounting policy differences
Inventory valuation: IFRS prohibits the use of the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) method, while US GAAP allows it
Impairment of assets: IFRS requires a one-step impairment test and the reversal of impairment losses in certain circumstances, while US GAAP uses a two-step test and prohibits reversal of impairment losses
Development costs: IFRS allows capitalization of development costs if certain criteria are met, while US GAAP requires expensing of all development costs
Classification of liabilities: IFRS classifies liabilities as current if they are due within 12 months after the reporting period or if the entity does not have an unconditional right to defer settlement for at least 12 months, while US GAAP generally classifies liabilities as current if they are expected to be settled within the entity's normal operating cycle or within 12 months
Adoption of IFRS
Current state of global adoption
As of 2021, over 140 countries require or permit the use of IFRS for domestic listed companies
Major economies that have adopted IFRS include the European Union, Australia, Canada, and South Korea
The United States has not adopted IFRS but allows foreign private issuers to use IFRS in their SEC filings
Benefits vs challenges of IFRS adoption for SMEs
Benefits:
Improved access to international capital markets
Enhanced comparability of financial statements across countries
Reduced cost of capital due to increased transparency and credibility
Simplified reporting for SMEs with foreign subsidiaries or cross-border transactions
Challenges:
Transition costs, including staff training and IT system updates
Potential for increased volatility in reported financial results due to fair value measurements
Difficulty in interpreting and applying principles-based standards consistently
Limited resources and expertise compared to larger entities
Auditing considerations with IFRS
Impact on audit planning and procedures
Auditors need to be knowledgeable about IFRS requirements and their application to the specific entity
Risk assessment procedures should consider the potential impact of IFRS adoption on the entity's financial reporting
Auditors may need to adjust audit procedures to address IFRS-specific risks and requirements (e.g., fair value measurements, impairment testing)
Communication with those charged with governance should include discussions on the entity's IFRS implementation process and any significant issues encountered
Auditor's report under IFRS
The auditor's report should refer to the financial statements being prepared in accordance with IFRS
Key audit matters (KAMs) should be included in the auditor's report for listed entities, describing the most significant matters in the audit of the financial statements
The auditor's opinion should state whether the financial statements give a true and fair view (or present fairly, in all material respects) in accordance with IFRS
Future developments in international accounting
Convergence projects between IASB and FASB
The IASB and FASB have been working on convergence projects to reduce differences between IFRS and US GAAP
Some notable joint projects include revenue recognition (IFRS 15 and ASC 606), leases (IFRS 16 and ASC 842), and credit losses (IFRS 9 and ASC 326)
Despite progress in convergence, significant differences remain, and complete convergence is unlikely in the near future
Upcoming changes to major IFRS standards
IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts (effective 2023): Establishes principles for the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of insurance contracts
Amendments to IAS 1 Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current (effective 2023): Clarifies the criteria for classifying liabilities as current or non-current
Amendments to IFRS 3 Reference to the Conceptual Framework (effective 2022): Updates references to the revised Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting
Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2018-2020 Cycle (effective 2022): Makes minor amendments to IFRS 1, IFRS 9, IFRS 16, and IAS 41