10.4 Challenges in Combating Torture and Ill-Treatment
4 min read•july 31, 2024
Torture remains a global challenge despite efforts to eradicate it. Impunity, weak accountability, and institutional hurdles hinder progress. Post-9/11 counterterrorism measures have blurred lines between permissible interrogation and torture, creating legal gray areas.
Civil society plays a crucial role in combating torture through documentation, legal support, and advocacy. International mechanisms like the UN provide a framework, but national implementation varies. Effective prevention requires addressing systemic issues and strengthening enforcement.
Challenges in Eradicating Torture
Impunity and Lack of Accountability
Top images from around the web for Impunity and Lack of Accountability
[Resources/Campaign] What is torture? | Human Rights Online Philippines View original
Is this image relevant?
Egypt: On International Day in Support of Victims of Torture, First Step to Combating Torture is ... View original
Is this image relevant?
[Poster] The right to be free from torture and ill-treatment by Balay Rehabilitation Center ... View original
Is this image relevant?
[Resources/Campaign] What is torture? | Human Rights Online Philippines View original
Is this image relevant?
Egypt: On International Day in Support of Victims of Torture, First Step to Combating Torture is ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Impunity and Lack of Accountability
[Resources/Campaign] What is torture? | Human Rights Online Philippines View original
Is this image relevant?
Egypt: On International Day in Support of Victims of Torture, First Step to Combating Torture is ... View original
Is this image relevant?
[Poster] The right to be free from torture and ill-treatment by Balay Rehabilitation Center ... View original
Is this image relevant?
[Resources/Campaign] What is torture? | Human Rights Online Philippines View original
Is this image relevant?
Egypt: On International Day in Support of Victims of Torture, First Step to Combating Torture is ... View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Impunity exempts perpetrators of human rights violations from punishment or consequences undermines efforts to eradicate torture
Lack of accountability fails to hold individuals, institutions, or states responsible for acts of torture stems from weak legal frameworks or political interference
Systemic issues within law enforcement and security institutions perpetuate torture practices
Inadequate training of personnel
Entrenched violent practices
Culture of violence within institutions
State denial and cover-ups of torture incidents hinder investigations and prosecutions
Obstruction of evidence gathering
Intimidation of witnesses and victims
Manipulation of official records
Institutional and Societal Challenges
Absence of effective monitoring mechanisms contributes to continued torture in detention facilities
Lack of independent oversight bodies
Limited access to detention centers for external monitors
Insufficient resources for regular inspections
Challenges in gathering evidence and prosecuting torture cases impede combating impunity
Difficulty in obtaining medical documentation of injuries
Lack of forensic expertise in some jurisdictions
Statute of limitations issues in certain legal systems
Normalization or justification of torture in certain contexts perpetuates its use
During interrogations (waterboarding)
In the name of national security (extraordinary rendition)
As a means of maintaining order in prisons (solitary confinement)
Counterterrorism vs Torture Prohibition
Post-9/11 Challenges to Torture Prohibition
Increase in extraordinary rendition, secret detention, and enhanced interrogation techniques challenges absolute
CIA black sites in various countries
Use of stress positions and sleep deprivation
National security concerns blur lines between permissible interrogation and torture
"Ticking time bomb" scenario used as justification
Expansion of what constitutes "necessary force"
Creation of legal gray areas undermines established human rights protections
Concept of "enemy combatants" (Guantanamo Bay detainees)
Indefinite detention without charge or trial
Legislative and Policy Impacts
Counterterrorism legislation expands state powers and reduces oversight
Increased detention periods without judicial review
Broadened definitions of terrorism-related offenses
Reduced legal protections for suspects in terrorism cases
Invocation of state secrecy privileges hinders torture investigations
Classified information withheld from courts
Restrictions on public disclosure of counterterrorism operations
Use of diplomatic assurances in deportation cases raises concerns
Agreements between states to not torture deported individuals
Questionable effectiveness of such assurances in practice
Proliferation of surveillance technologies raises new torture and privacy concerns
Psychological impact of constant monitoring
Use of data collection for targeted harassment or intimidation
Civil Society's Role in Combating Torture
Documentation and Legal Support
Civil society organizations document and report torture cases
global reporting on torture practices
's urgent action campaigns
Human rights defenders provide legal assistance to torture victims
Pro bono representation in domestic courts
Support in filing complaints to UN treaty bodies
NGOs engage in strategic litigation to challenge state practices
Cases brought before the European Court of Human Rights
Public interest litigation in national supreme courts
Civil society contributes to rehabilitation of torture survivors
Medical treatment for physical injuries
Psychological counseling for trauma
Social reintegration programs
Advocacy and Awareness
Human rights education campaigns build public opposition to torture
School curriculum development on human rights
Public seminars and workshops on torture prevention
Networking among civil society organizations strengthens advocacy efforts
Coalition building for joint advocacy initiatives
Sharing of best practices in torture documentation
Human rights defenders face risks for their anti-torture work
Physical threats and intimidation
Legal harassment and arbitrary detention
Need for protection mechanisms (UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders)
Effectiveness of Anti-Torture Efforts
International Mechanisms and Standards
UN Convention against Torture establishes global framework for torture prevention
171 state parties as of 2023
Optional Protocol introduces preventive monitoring system
National Preventive Mechanisms show varying effectiveness in torture prevention
Regular visits to detention facilities
Recommendations for improving conditions and practices
UN Special Rapporteurs and treaty bodies expose torture practices
Country visits and thematic reports
Review of state compliance with treaty obligations
Regional human rights systems develop significant torture jurisprudence
European Court of Human Rights landmark cases (Selmouni v. France)
Inter-American Court of Human Rights rulings on disappearances and torture
National Implementation and Challenges
National legislation criminalizing torture adopted in many countries
Incorporation of torture definition from UN Convention
Establishment of domestic remedies for torture victims
Training programs for law enforcement on human rights implemented widely
Police academy curricula on human rights standards
In-service training on non-coercive interrogation techniques
Istanbul Protocol provides guidelines for torture documentation
Standardized medical and psychological evaluation procedures
Forensic documentation of torture evidence
Enforcement of anti-torture measures remains inconsistent
Gap between legislation and practice in many jurisdictions
Lack of political will to prosecute high-level officials
Resource constraints in implementing comprehensive prevention strategies