You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

Torture remains a global challenge despite efforts to eradicate it. Impunity, weak accountability, and institutional hurdles hinder progress. Post-9/11 counterterrorism measures have blurred lines between permissible interrogation and torture, creating legal gray areas.

Civil society plays a crucial role in combating torture through documentation, legal support, and advocacy. International mechanisms like the UN provide a framework, but national implementation varies. Effective prevention requires addressing systemic issues and strengthening enforcement.

Challenges in Eradicating Torture

Impunity and Lack of Accountability

Top images from around the web for Impunity and Lack of Accountability
Top images from around the web for Impunity and Lack of Accountability
  • Impunity exempts perpetrators of human rights violations from punishment or consequences undermines efforts to eradicate torture
  • Lack of accountability fails to hold individuals, institutions, or states responsible for acts of torture stems from weak legal frameworks or political interference
  • Systemic issues within law enforcement and security institutions perpetuate torture practices
    • Inadequate training of personnel
    • Entrenched violent practices
    • Culture of violence within institutions
  • State denial and cover-ups of torture incidents hinder investigations and prosecutions
    • Obstruction of evidence gathering
    • Intimidation of witnesses and victims
    • Manipulation of official records

Institutional and Societal Challenges

  • Absence of effective monitoring mechanisms contributes to continued torture in detention facilities
    • Lack of independent oversight bodies
    • Limited access to detention centers for external monitors
    • Insufficient resources for regular inspections
  • Challenges in gathering evidence and prosecuting torture cases impede combating impunity
    • Difficulty in obtaining medical documentation of injuries
    • Lack of forensic expertise in some jurisdictions
    • Statute of limitations issues in certain legal systems
  • Normalization or justification of torture in certain contexts perpetuates its use
    • During interrogations (waterboarding)
    • In the name of national security (extraordinary rendition)
    • As a means of maintaining order in prisons (solitary confinement)

Counterterrorism vs Torture Prohibition

Post-9/11 Challenges to Torture Prohibition

  • Increase in extraordinary rendition, secret detention, and enhanced interrogation techniques challenges absolute
    • CIA black sites in various countries
    • Use of stress positions and sleep deprivation
  • National security concerns blur lines between permissible interrogation and torture
    • "Ticking time bomb" scenario used as justification
    • Expansion of what constitutes "necessary force"
  • Creation of legal gray areas undermines established human rights protections
    • Concept of "enemy combatants" (Guantanamo Bay detainees)
    • Indefinite detention without charge or trial

Legislative and Policy Impacts

  • Counterterrorism legislation expands state powers and reduces oversight
    • Increased detention periods without judicial review
    • Broadened definitions of terrorism-related offenses
    • Reduced legal protections for suspects in terrorism cases
  • Invocation of state secrecy privileges hinders torture investigations
    • Classified information withheld from courts
    • Restrictions on public disclosure of counterterrorism operations
  • Use of diplomatic assurances in deportation cases raises concerns
    • Agreements between states to not torture deported individuals
    • Questionable effectiveness of such assurances in practice
  • Proliferation of surveillance technologies raises new torture and privacy concerns
    • Psychological impact of constant monitoring
    • Use of data collection for targeted harassment or intimidation

Civil Society's Role in Combating Torture

  • Civil society organizations document and report torture cases
    • global reporting on torture practices
    • 's urgent action campaigns
  • Human rights defenders provide legal assistance to torture victims
    • Pro bono representation in domestic courts
    • Support in filing complaints to UN treaty bodies
  • NGOs engage in strategic litigation to challenge state practices
    • Cases brought before the European Court of Human Rights
    • Public interest litigation in national supreme courts
  • Civil society contributes to rehabilitation of torture survivors
    • Medical treatment for physical injuries
    • Psychological counseling for trauma
    • Social reintegration programs

Advocacy and Awareness

  • Human rights education campaigns build public opposition to torture
    • School curriculum development on human rights
    • Public seminars and workshops on torture prevention
  • Networking among civil society organizations strengthens advocacy efforts
    • Coalition building for joint advocacy initiatives
    • Sharing of best practices in torture documentation
  • Human rights defenders face risks for their anti-torture work
    • Physical threats and intimidation
    • Legal harassment and arbitrary detention
    • Need for protection mechanisms (UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders)

Effectiveness of Anti-Torture Efforts

International Mechanisms and Standards

  • UN Convention against Torture establishes global framework for torture prevention
    • 171 state parties as of 2023
    • Optional Protocol introduces preventive monitoring system
  • National Preventive Mechanisms show varying effectiveness in torture prevention
    • Regular visits to detention facilities
    • Recommendations for improving conditions and practices
  • UN Special Rapporteurs and treaty bodies expose torture practices
    • Country visits and thematic reports
    • Review of state compliance with treaty obligations
  • Regional human rights systems develop significant torture jurisprudence
    • European Court of Human Rights landmark cases (Selmouni v. France)
    • Inter-American Court of Human Rights rulings on disappearances and torture

National Implementation and Challenges

  • National legislation criminalizing torture adopted in many countries
    • Incorporation of torture definition from UN Convention
    • Establishment of domestic remedies for torture victims
  • Training programs for law enforcement on human rights implemented widely
    • Police academy curricula on human rights standards
    • In-service training on non-coercive interrogation techniques
  • Istanbul Protocol provides guidelines for torture documentation
    • Standardized medical and psychological evaluation procedures
    • Forensic documentation of torture evidence
  • Enforcement of anti-torture measures remains inconsistent
    • Gap between legislation and practice in many jurisdictions
    • Lack of political will to prosecute high-level officials
    • Resource constraints in implementing comprehensive prevention strategies
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary