7.2 Special Procedures: Special Rapporteurs and Working Groups

Special Procedures are a vital part of the UN's human rights system. They involve independent experts who monitor and report on human rights issues globally, acting as watchdogs and advisors on specific countries or themes.

These experts, known as Special Rapporteurs or Working Groups, play a crucial role in enforcing human rights. They conduct country visits, respond to violations, and contribute to developing international standards, serving as an early warning system for human rights crises.

Special Procedures in the UN Human Rights System

Independent Experts and Their Role

Top images from around the web for Independent Experts and Their Role

• 

  UN Special Rapporteur Maina Kiai speaks at a HRC26 side ev… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  UN Special Rapporteur analyses AI’s impact on human rights View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  UN Passes Historic Resolution to Establish Independent SOGI Expert | Heinrich Böll Stiftung View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  UN Special Rapporteur Maina Kiai speaks at a HRC26 side ev… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  UN Special Rapporteur analyses AI’s impact on human rights View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Independent Experts and Their Role

• 

  UN Special Rapporteur Maina Kiai speaks at a HRC26 side ev… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  UN Special Rapporteur analyses AI’s impact on human rights View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  UN Passes Historic Resolution to Establish Independent SOGI Expert | Heinrich Böll Stiftung View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  UN Special Rapporteur Maina Kiai speaks at a HRC26 side ev… | Flickr View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  UN Special Rapporteur analyses AI’s impact on human rights View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Special procedures involve independent human rights experts appointed by the UN Human Rights Council
• Experts monitor, report, and advise on human rights situations in specific countries or thematic issues globally
• Central element of UN human rights machinery covering civil, cultural, economic, political, and social rights
• Experts can be individual (Special Rapporteurs, Special Representatives, Independent Experts) or working groups of five members
• Undertake country visits to assess human rights situations firsthand
• Act on individual cases and broader structural issues by sending communications to States
• Conduct thematic studies to analyze specific human rights topics in depth
• Engage in advocacy activities to promote human rights awareness and implementation

Functions and Significance

• Serve as "early warning" mechanisms for urgent human rights situations
• Bring critical issues to the attention of the international community
• Facilitate comprehensive analysis of human rights across different regions and political systems
• Identify global trends and best practices in human rights protection
• Provide in-depth analysis of human rights situations in specific countries
• Respond to severe or systematic human rights violations
• Contribute to the development of international human rights standards
• Inform policy-making at national and international levels

Thematic vs Country-Specific Procedures

Thematic Special Procedures

• Focus on specific human rights issues or phenomena worldwide
• Examine topics regardless of geographical location or political context
• Established for three-year periods with possibility of renewal
• Allow for comprehensive analysis of particular human rights issues across regions
• Facilitate identification of global trends and best practices
• Significantly outnumber country-specific mandates
• Reflect shift towards addressing global human rights issues
• Examples include Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, Working Group on Arbitrary Detention

Country-Specific Special Procedures

• Mandated to examine, monitor, and publicly report on human rights in specific countries or territories
• Typically reviewed annually due to political sensitivity
• Provide in-depth analysis of human rights situation in a particular state
• Often established in response to severe or systematic human rights violations
• More politically sensitive than thematic mandates
• Fewer in number compared to thematic special procedures
• Examples include Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, Independent Expert on the situation of human rights in Somalia

Selection and Mandate of Special Procedures

Appointment Process

• UN Human Rights Council appoints Special Rapporteurs and Working Group members
• Selection process competitive and transparent
• Candidates must possess relevant expertise, independence, impartiality, personal integrity, and objectivity
• Process involves public calls for nominations
• Consultative Group reviews candidates
• President of the Human Rights Council makes final appointment
• Mandate holders serve in personal capacity without financial compensation
• Independence from UN system ensured through unpaid status

Mandate Establishment and Duration

• Human Rights Council resolutions establish mandates
• Resolutions outline specific tasks and responsibilities
• Thematic special procedures typically last three years
• Country-specific mandates usually set for one year
• Both types of mandates can be renewed
• Mandate holders report annually to Human Rights Council
• Many also report to UN General Assembly
• Reports present findings, conclusions, and recommendations

Impact of Special Procedures on Human Rights

Contributions and Achievements

• Develop international human rights standards through reports and expert analyses
• Act as early warning system for potential human rights crises
• Engage directly with governments through communications and country visits
• Apply pressure for human rights improvements through public statements
• Increase transparency in human rights situations
• Mobilize civil society and international community to address concerns
• Influence legislation and governmental practices
• Contribute to normative developments in human rights field

Challenges and Limitations

• Face resource constraints limiting scope of activities
• Encounter non-cooperation from some states
• Recommendations non-binding, potentially limiting effectiveness
• Impact often indirect and long-term rather than immediate
• Gradual improvements in human rights situations more common than rapid resolutions
• Effectiveness can vary depending on political will and international support
• Mandates may overlap, requiring coordination to avoid duplication of efforts