5.6 Remedies Available for the Misappropriation of Trade Secrets

Trade secret protection is a crucial aspect of intellectual property law. When trade secrets are misappropriated, the legal system offers various remedies to protect the rights of the secret's owner and deter future violations.

Injunctions and damages are the primary remedies for trade secret misappropriation. Courts can issue injunctions to prevent further disclosure or use of the secret, while damages compensate for losses and punish willful violations. The specific remedies depend on factors like the nature of the misappropriation and the secret's value.

Remedies for Misappropriation of Trade Secrets

Injunctions for trade secret protection

Top images from around the web for Injunctions for trade secret protection

• 

  Injunction - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal Engraved image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Protection of potential trade secrets in an action by stages | FPC Review View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Departing Employees, Confidentiality Clauses and European Trade Secret Protection | SpringerLink View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Injunction - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal Engraved image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Protection of potential trade secrets in an action by stages | FPC Review View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Injunctions for trade secret protection

• 

  Injunction - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal Engraved image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Protection of potential trade secrets in an action by stages | FPC Review View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Departing Employees, Confidentiality Clauses and European Trade Secret Protection | SpringerLink View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Injunction - Free of Charge Creative Commons Legal Engraved image View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Protection of potential trade secrets in an action by stages | FPC Review View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Court orders that prohibit or compel specific actions to prevent misappropriation
  • Prohibitory injunctions prevent the defendant from engaging in certain conduct (disclosing trade secrets)
  • Mandatory injunctions require the defendant to take specific actions (returning stolen documents)
• Preliminary injunctions issued before a trial to prevent irreparable harm
  • Plaintiff must show likelihood of success on the merits and irreparable harm without the injunction (loss of competitive advantage)
• Permanent injunctions issued after a trial when plaintiff has proven misappropriation
  • Prevent further misappropriation and protect the trade secret (prohibiting use of stolen customer lists)
• Injunctions can prevent both actual and threatened misappropriation
  • Actual misappropriation: defendant has already acquired, disclosed, or used the trade secret (reverse engineering a product)
  • Threatened misappropriation: high risk that defendant will engage in misappropriation (former employee joining a competitor)
  • Courts may consider the inevitable disclosure doctrine when evaluating threatened misappropriation

Damages under Uniform Trade Secrets Act

• Actual damages measured by plaintiff's losses or defendant's unjust enrichment
  • Lost profits resulting from the misappropriation (decreased sales due to competitor's use of trade secret)
  • Reasonable royalties for unauthorized disclosure or use of the trade secret (licensing fees for similar technology)
• Punitive damages available when misappropriation is willful and malicious
  • Limited to an amount not exceeding twice the actual damages awarded (maximum of $2 million if actual damages are$1 million)
• Attorney's fees awarded to prevailing party if misappropriation is willful and malicious or if claim is made in bad faith
  • Encourages legitimate claims and deters frivolous lawsuits (awarding fees to defendant if plaintiff's claim lacks merit)

Factors in trade secret injunctions

• Nature and extent of the misappropriation considers severity of defendant's conduct
  • Level of defendant's involvement in misappropriation (actively participating vs. inadvertently receiving information)
• Value and importance of the trade secret
  • Competitive advantage provided by the trade secret (unique manufacturing process)
  • Potential harm to plaintiff if trade secret is further disclosed or used (loss of market share)
• Feasibility of alternatives to injunctive relief
  • Whether monetary damages would provide an adequate remedy (one-time disclosure vs. ongoing use)
  • Likelihood that defendant will continue to misappropriate the trade secret (history of improper conduct)
• Balance of hardships between plaintiff and defendant
  • Impact of injunction on defendant's business (preventing use of independently developed technology)
  • Public interest in protecting trade secrets and promoting fair competition (encouraging innovation)
• Duration of injunction should eliminate commercial advantage gained by misappropriation
  • Typically lasts until trade secret has ceased to exist or has become generally known through legitimate means (independent discovery or reverse engineering)

Additional Legal Considerations

• Confidentiality agreements are often used to protect trade secrets and can be enforced through contract law
• Economic espionage involves the theft of trade secrets for the benefit of foreign entities and is subject to criminal penalties
• Trade secret misappropriation can also be addressed through unfair competition laws, providing additional legal remedies for affected parties