🧩Intro to Algorithms Unit 11 – Dynamic Programming: Principles & Examples
Dynamic programming is a powerful optimization technique that breaks complex problems into simpler subproblems. It stores solutions to avoid redundant calculations, improving efficiency for problems with overlapping subproblems and optimal substructure.
Key concepts include memoization, tabulation, and recurrence relations. DP applies to various domains like optimization and graph theory. Common patterns include knapsack problems, longest common subsequence, and shortest path algorithms. Real-world applications span bioinformatics, finance, and robotics.
Fibonacci Numbers: Compute the nth Fibonacci number
deffib(n):if n <=1:return n
return fib(n-1)+ fib(n-2)
Longest Palindromic Substring: Find the longest palindromic substring in a string
deflongestPalindrome(s): n =len(s) dp =[[False]* n for _ inrange(n)] ans =""for length inrange(n):for i inrange(n - length): j = i + length
if length ==0: dp[i][j]=Trueelif length ==1: dp[i][j]=(s[i]== s[j])else: dp[i][j]=(s[i]== s[j]and dp[i+1][j-1])if dp[i][j]and length +1>len(ans): ans = s[i:j+1]return ans
Practice platforms (LeetCode, HackerRank, Project Euler) offer DP problems to solve and discuss
Tips for Solving DP Problems
Start by solving the problem recursively to understand its structure
Identify overlapping subproblems and optimal substructure
Define the state variables and write the recurrence relation
Implement the solution using memoization or tabulation
Analyze time and space complexity
Consider if the problem can be solved using a greedy approach
Practice regularly to recognize common patterns and develop intuition
Break down complex problems into simpler subproblems
Use clear variable names and comments to make your code readable
Comparing DP to Other Techniques
Brute Force: DP is often faster than brute force as it avoids redundant calculations
Example: Fibonacci numbers have exponential time complexity with brute force but linear with DP
Greedy Algorithms: DP considers all possible solutions while greedy algorithms make locally optimal choices
Example: Fractional Knapsack can be solved optimally with a greedy approach, but 0/1 Knapsack requires DP
Memoization vs Tabulation: Memoization is top-down and recursive, while tabulation is bottom-up and iterative
Memoization is often easier to implement but may have higher overhead due to recursive calls
Tabulation typically has better space complexity as it only stores necessary previous states
Divide and Conquer: Both break down problems into subproblems, but DP reuses solutions while divide and conquer solves subproblems independently
Example: Merge Sort (divide and conquer) vs Longest Common Subsequence (DP)