You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides
You have 3 free guides left 😟
Unlock your guides

shines in solving sequence comparison problems like the and . These algorithms find patterns and measure similarities between strings, crucial in fields like bioinformatics, text analysis, and version control.

Both LCS and Edit Distance use clever table-filling techniques to break down complex problems into manageable subproblems. By storing and reusing intermediate results, they achieve efficient solutions, showcasing the power of dynamic programming in tackling real-world challenges.

Longest Common Subsequence Problem

Definition and Applications

Top images from around the web for Definition and Applications
Top images from around the web for Definition and Applications
  • (LCS) finds the longest common to two or more sequences
  • Subsequence appears in the same relative order but not necessarily contiguous
  • Applications in bioinformatics compare genetic sequences and identify similarities between DNA or protein sequences
  • Version control systems use LCS to determine differences between file versions and generate efficient diff outputs
  • Natural language processing employs LCS for plagiarism detection and text similarity analysis
  • Multiple problem extends LCS to multiple sequences crucial in evolutionary biology and comparative genomics
  • LCS serves as foundation for related problems (shortest common supersequence, longest increasing subsequence)

Problem Characteristics

  • Exhibits allows problem to be broken down into smaller subproblems
  • Contains solutions to subproblems can be reused
  • Suitable for dynamic programming approach due to these characteristics
  • Can be solved recursively but inefficient for large inputs due to redundant computations
  • Efficient solution requires storing and reusing intermediate results

Dynamic Programming for LCS

Table Construction and Filling

  • Construct 2D table to store LCS lengths for all prefixes of two input sequences
  • Table dimensions (m+1) x (n+1) where m and n are lengths of sequences
  • Fill table using recurrence relation based on character comparison:
    • If characters match add 1 to LCS length of prefixes without these characters
    • If characters don't match take maximum of LCS lengths excluding one character from either sequence
  • Recurrence relation: 0 & \text{if } i = 0 \text{ or } j = 0 \\ LCS[i-1][j-1] + 1 & \text{if } X[i] = Y[j] \\ \max(LCS[i-1][j], LCS[i][j-1]) & \text{if } X[i] \neq Y[j] \end{cases}$$
  • Example: For sequences "ABCDGH" and "AEDFHR" LCS is "ADH" with length 3

Algorithm Complexity and Optimization

  • Time complexity O(mn) where m and n are lengths of input sequences
  • Space complexity O(mn) can be optimized to O(min(m,n)) by using only two rows of table at a time
  • Backtracking through filled table reconstructs actual LCS sequence not just its length
  • Optimization techniques:
    • Using bit vectors for binary alphabet
    • Hirschberg's algorithm combines divide-and-conquer with dynamic programming to achieve O(min(m,n)) space complexity

Edit Distance Problem

Problem Definition and Significance

  • Edit distance () measures minimum number of single-character edits to transform one string into another
  • Single-character edits include insertions deletions and substitutions
  • Fundamental in computational linguistics DNA sequence alignment and spell-checking algorithms
  • Provides quantitative measure of string similarity crucial in fuzzy string matching and approximate string matching
  • Natural language processing uses edit distance for automatic spelling error correction and speech recognition
  • Bioinformatics applies edit distance to analyze mutations and evolutionary relationships between genetic sequences
  • Generalizes to weighted edit distance where different have varying costs allowing nuanced comparisons

Applications and Variations

  • Spell checkers suggest corrections based on words with low edit distance from misspelled word
  • DNA sequence alignment uses edit distance to measure similarity between genetic sequences
  • Plagiarism detection compares document similarity using edit distance on word or sentence level
  • Fuzzy string search finds strings that approximately match a pattern within a specified edit distance
  • Weighted edit distance assigns different costs to various edit operations (transposition might cost less than substitution)
  • Example: Edit distance between "kitten" and "sitting" is 3 (substitute 'k' for 's' substitute 'e' for 'i' insert 'g' at the end)

Dynamic Programming for Edit Distance

Table Construction and Filling

  • Construct (m+1) x (n+1) table where m and n are lengths of input strings
  • Base cases represent edit distances between empty strings and prefixes of input strings
  • Fill table using recurrence relation considering three operations at each step:
    • Insertion
    • Deletion
    • Substitution (or match if characters are the same)
  • Recurrence relation: D[i-1][j] + 1 & \text{(deletion)} \\ D[i][j-1] + 1 & \text{(insertion)} \\ D[i-1][j-1] + \text{cost} & \text{(substitution or match)} \end{cases}$$ Where cost = 0 if characters match 1 otherwise
  • Example: Edit distance between "cat" and "cut" is 1 (substitute 'a' with 'u')

Algorithm Implementation and Extensions

  • Time complexity O(mn) where m and n are lengths of input strings
  • Space complexity O(mn) optimizable to O(min(m,n)) using only two rows of table
  • Backtracking through filled table reconstructs actual sequence of edit operations
  • Algorithm extensions:
    • Handle more complex edit operations (transpositions swapping adjacent characters)
    • Custom costs for different types of edits (making vowel substitutions cheaper than consonant substitutions)
    • Damerau-Levenshtein distance includes transposition as a single edit operation
  • Practical implementations often use optimizations:
    • Early termination when edit distance exceeds a threshold
    • Bit-parallel algorithms for faster computation on modern processors
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.


© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.

© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Glossary