13.1 Models of Trade and Exchange in Archaeology

Trade and exchange models in archaeology reveal how societies interact and distribute resources. From reciprocal gift-giving in small groups to market-based systems in complex civilizations, these models show how economic structures evolve alongside social and political development.

Understanding trade models helps archaeologists piece together ancient social dynamics. By examining exchange patterns, we can uncover power structures, technological advancements, and cultural connections that shaped past societies and continue to influence our world today.

Models of Trade and Exchange

Models of archaeological exchange

Top images from around the web for Models of archaeological exchange

• 

  Azteken – Klexikon - Das Freie Kinderlexikon View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Regional Settlements | Boundless US History View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  apworldhistory-rochester-k12-mi-us - 1G. Late Classical Period (200 CE - 600 CE) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Azteken – Klexikon - Das Freie Kinderlexikon View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Regional Settlements | Boundless US History View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Models of archaeological exchange

• 

  Azteken – Klexikon - Das Freie Kinderlexikon View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Regional Settlements | Boundless US History View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  apworldhistory-rochester-k12-mi-us - 1G. Late Classical Period (200 CE - 600 CE) View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Azteken – Klexikon - Das Freie Kinderlexikon View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Regional Settlements | Boundless US History View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Reciprocal exchange involves the exchange of goods or services between individuals or groups based on social obligations and relationships, often including gift-giving and ceremonial exchanges (potlatch ceremonies) typically occurring in small-scale societies with limited specialization
• Redistributive exchange involves the collection of goods or resources by a central authority (chiefs, kings) which then redistributes the goods to the community, often associated with chiefdoms and early states (Inca Empire) and can be used to maintain social hierarchy and political control
• Market exchange involves the exchange of goods or services based on supply and demand with prices determined by market forces, requires a standardized medium of exchange (currency, coins) and is associated with complex societies and specialized production (Roman Empire)

Contexts for trade models

• Applicability of models depends on the social, economic, and political organization of the society
  • Reciprocal exchange more common in small-scale, kin-based societies (hunter-gatherers)
  • Redistributive exchange often found in chiefdoms and early states (Mayan civilization)
  • Market exchange prevalent in complex societies with specialized production (ancient Greece)
• Limitations of models include being idealizations that may not fully capture the complexity of past exchange systems, incomplete or ambiguous archaeological evidence making it difficult to determine the exact nature of exchange, and the possibility of multiple forms of exchange coexisting within a single society (Indus Valley Civilization)
• Important to consider the specific archaeological context when applying models, including:
  1. Environmental factors such as resource availability and distribution (obsidian trade in Mesoamerica)
  2. Technological factors such as the level of craft specialization and transportation infrastructure (Silk Roads)
  3. Social and political factors such as the presence of social hierarchies and the role of elites in controlling exchange (Mesopotamian city-states)

Social, Economic, and Political Implications

Implications of exchange modes

• Social implications of exchange include creating and maintaining social bonds and obligations, gift-giving and ceremonial exchange reinforcing social hierarchies and power structures (Kula ring), and the control of exchange networks being a source of social prestige and influence (Phoenician traders)
• Economic implications include different modes of exchange affecting the distribution of wealth and resources within a society, specialization and division of labor developing in response to the demands of exchange systems (Medieval guilds), and the growth of trade and exchange stimulating economic development and the emergence of new technologies (compass, astrolabe)
• Political implications include the control of exchange networks being a source of political power and authority, elites using their control over exchange to maintain their position and influence (Aztec tribute system), and the development of market exchange leading to the emergence of new political institutions (Hanseatic League, East India Company)

Gift-giving in social structures

• Gift-giving as a means of creating and maintaining social bonds with gifts creating obligations and expectations of reciprocity (Northwest Coast potlatch) and the exchange of gifts establishing and reinforcing social hierarchies (Trobriand Islanders)
• Ceremonial exchange in the context of rituals and celebrations involves the exchange of valuable or symbolic items during ceremonies (Moka exchange) which can legitimize social and political authority
• Elites may use the distribution of gifts to create networks of loyalty and obligation and the control of valuable or exotic items can be a source of prestige and influence (Egyptian pharaohs)
• Gift-giving and ceremonial exchange play a role in the formation of alliances and political relationships with the exchange of gifts between leaders or groups establishing political alliances (Iroquois Confederacy) and ceremonial exchanges being used to negotiate peace treaties or resolve conflicts (Calumet ceremony)