3.2 Processual Archaeology

Processual archaeology emerged in the 1960s as a reaction to the culture-historical approach. It aimed to understand the processes shaping past societies by studying relationships between human behavior and the environment, and developing general laws about cultural change.

This approach shifted focus from description to explanation, introducing scientific rigor and hypothesis testing. It emphasized quantitative analysis and interdisciplinary methods but faced criticism for oversimplifying complex cultural processes and neglecting individual agency and symbolism.

Processual Archaeology

Emergence of processual archaeology

Top images from around the web for Emergence of processual archaeology

• 

  Module 2 - Coupled Human-Environment Systems View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Understanding Culture Clashes and Catalyzing Change: A Culture Cycle Approach View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cultural Environment as a Potential for Society Renewal - Research leap View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Module 2 - Coupled Human-Environment Systems View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Understanding Culture Clashes and Catalyzing Change: A Culture Cycle Approach View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Emergence of processual archaeology

• 

  Module 2 - Coupled Human-Environment Systems View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Understanding Culture Clashes and Catalyzing Change: A Culture Cycle Approach View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Cultural Environment as a Potential for Society Renewal - Research leap View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Module 2 - Coupled Human-Environment Systems View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Understanding Culture Clashes and Catalyzing Change: A Culture Cycle Approach View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Developed in the 1960s as a reaction against the limitations of the culture-historical approach
  • Culture-historical approach focused on describing and categorizing artifacts and cultures (pottery styles, lithic technologies)
  • Limited in its ability to explain the processes of cultural change and human behavior
• Sought to understand the underlying processes that shaped past societies
  • Emphasized the importance of studying the relationships between human behavior and the environment (settlement patterns, subsistence strategies)
  • Aimed to develop general laws and theories about cultural change and adaptation (cultural ecology, systems theory)

Goals and methods of processual archaeology

• Main goals:
  • Explain cultural change and variability through the study of ecological, economic, and social processes
  • Develop general laws and theories about human behavior and cultural evolution (cultural materialism, evolutionary archaeology)
  • Emphasize the importance of studying the function and adaptation of artifacts and cultural practices (lithic use-wear analysis, faunal analysis)
• Methods employed:
  • Hypothesis testing and deductive reasoning
    1. Formulate testable hypotheses based on existing theories and data
    2. Collect and analyze data to support or refute hypotheses
  • Quantitative analysis and statistical methods
    • Use of mathematical models and statistical tests to identify patterns and relationships in archaeological data (spatial analysis, multivariate statistics)
  • Interdisciplinary approaches
    • Incorporation of methods and theories from other disciplines (paleobotany, zooarchaeology, geoarchaeology)

Contributions vs limitations of processual archaeology

• Contributions:
  • Shifted focus from description to explanation of cultural change and human behavior
  • Introduced scientific rigor and hypothesis testing to archaeological research
  • Emphasized the importance of studying the relationships between humans and their environment (settlement patterns, resource exploitation)
  • Developed new methods and techniques for analyzing archaeological data (quantitative analysis, experimental archaeology)
• Limitations:
  • Tendency to oversimplify complex cultural processes and reduce human behavior to ecological and economic factors
  • Neglect of the role of individual agency, ideology, and symbolism in shaping human behavior and cultural change (religious beliefs, artistic expression)
  • Overemphasis on general laws and theories at the expense of understanding the unique historical and cultural contexts of past societies
  • Limited consideration of the social and political dimensions of archaeological research and interpretation (power dynamics, gender roles)