Archaeological surveys are crucial for discovering and documenting ancient sites. They involve various techniques like pedestrian surveys, aerial surveys, and geophysical methods. Each approach has unique advantages and limitations, helping archaeologists piece together the past.
and processes are key components of archaeological surveys. These methods allow researchers to gather data from a distance, identify potential sites, and systematically record findings. Understanding these techniques is essential for effective archaeological fieldwork.
Archaeological Survey Techniques
Types of archaeological surveys
Top images from around the web for Types of archaeological surveys
Castro Garcia | The LiguSTAR Project: Archaeological Survey Techniques as Applied to the Study ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Internet Archaeol. 40. Atkinson and Preston. Geophysical Survey Summaries View original
Castro Garcia | The LiguSTAR Project: Archaeological Survey Techniques as Applied to the Study ... View original
Is this image relevant?
Internet Archaeol. 40. Atkinson and Preston. Geophysical Survey Summaries View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Pedestrian surveys involve archaeologists systematically walking over a study area to identify and record archaeological sites and artifacts on the surface
Typically used for small to medium-sized areas (up to several square kilometers)
Allows for detailed observation and recording of surface features and artifacts, such as stone tools, pottery sherds, or architectural remains
Aerial surveys are conducted using aircraft, drones, or satellites to capture images of the landscape from above
Useful for efficiently covering large areas (hundreds or thousands of square kilometers) and identifying landscape features, such as earthworks, roads, or buried structures
Provide a broad overview of the study area and its archaeological potential, but may miss smaller features or artifacts not visible from the air
Geophysical surveys use various technologies to detect and map subsurface features without the need for excavation
Common methods include:
detects magnetic anomalies caused by buried features, such as hearths, kilns, or iron objects
uses high-frequency radar pulses to create images of subsurface features, such as walls, floors, or burial chambers
measures the electrical resistance of the soil to identify buried features, such as stone foundations, ditches, or middens, based on differences in soil moisture and composition
Principles of remote sensing
Remote sensing involves collecting data about an object or area from a distance, without physical contact, using various parts of the electromagnetic spectrum, such as visible light, infrared, or radar
Data can be collected from a variety of platforms, including satellites (Landsat, Sentinel), aircraft (planes, helicopters), or drones (quadcopters, fixed-wing UAVs)
Remote sensing data can provide information about the physical and chemical properties of the Earth's surface, such as vegetation health, soil moisture, or thermal signatures
Archaeological applications of remote sensing include:
Identifying and mapping archaeological sites and features based on surface indicators, such as crop marks, soil marks, or shadow marks
Monitoring site conditions and changes over time, such as erosion, looting, or urban development
Providing context for archaeological sites within the broader landscape, such as ancient land use patterns, trade routes, or settlement systems
Guiding targeted ground-based surveys or excavations to areas of high archaeological potential or interest
Site identification process
Conduct background research to gather information about the study area, including previous archaeological investigations, historical records, and environmental data
Develop a predictive model to identify areas of high archaeological potential based on factors such as topography, water sources, soil types, and known site patterns
Conduct a of the study area using appropriate techniques (pedestrian, aerial, geophysical) to identify potential archaeological sites based on surface indicators, such as artifacts, features, or landscape anomalies
Record the location, extent, and characteristics of identified sites using , site maps, photographs, and standardized site recording forms or databases
Assign unique site numbers or codes to each identified site for future reference and management
Collect and record diagnostic artifacts or samples from each site for further analysis and dating
Assess the significance and research potential of each site based on factors such as integrity, rarity, and ability to address important research questions
Recommend further investigation or protection measures for significant sites, if necessary, such as detailed mapping, excavation, or nomination to the National Register of Historic Places
Submit completed site records to the appropriate state or national databases, such as the State Historic Preservation Office or the National Archaeological Database, for long-term curation and access by researchers and land managers
Survey techniques: advantages vs limitations
Pedestrian surveys:
Advantages:
Allow for detailed observation and recording of surface features and artifacts, providing high-resolution data on site characteristics and artifact distributions
Relatively low cost and minimal equipment requirements, making them accessible to a wide range of projects and budgets
Limitations:
Time-consuming for large areas, requiring significant labor and logistical support
May miss subsurface features or deeply buried sites that have no surface expression
Effectiveness can be limited by vegetation cover (dense forests), surface visibility (plowed fields), or post-depositional processes (erosion, development)
Aerial surveys:
Advantages:
Cover large areas efficiently, reducing survey time and costs compared to ground-based methods
Provide a broad overview of the landscape and its features, allowing for the identification of large-scale patterns and relationships
Can identify sites or features not visible from the ground, such as subtle topographic changes or vegetation anomalies
Limitations:
May miss smaller features or artifacts that are not visible from the air, particularly in areas with dense vegetation or complex topography
Require specialized equipment (aircraft, cameras) and expertise (pilots, photographers), which can be costly and logistically challenging
Effectiveness can be limited by weather conditions (clouds, haze), vegetation cover (leaf-on vs. leaf-off), or the timing of data acquisition (seasonal changes)
Geophysical surveys:
Advantages:
Provide a non-invasive way to detect and map subsurface features without the need for excavation, preserving the archaeological record for future research
Generate detailed information about the spatial distribution and characteristics of buried features, such as the depth, size, and shape of anomalies
Can guide targeted excavations or inform site protection strategies, such as avoidance or mitigation measures
Limitations:
Require specialized equipment (magnetometers, GPR, resistivity meters) and expertise (geophysicists, data processors), which can be costly and not widely available
Data processing and interpretation can be complex and time-consuming, requiring significant computing power and skilled analysts
Effectiveness can be limited by soil conditions (clay, bedrock), moisture content (wet vs. dry), or the depth of buried features (signal attenuation with depth)