Site formation processes shape archaeological sites over time. like and can bury or expose remains, while like and create new contexts and leave behind artifacts.
Understanding these processes is crucial for interpreting archaeological sites accurately. Archaeologists must consider how both natural and human-caused changes have affected the preservation and distribution of artifacts and features at a site.
Natural and Cultural Site Formation Processes
Natural vs cultural site formation
Top images from around the web for Natural vs cultural site formation
Erosion and Deposition by Streams | Physical Geography View original
Is this image relevant?
Overview of Relative Age and Orientation of Geologic Layers – Laboratory Manual for Earth Science View original
Is this image relevant?
Why It Matters: Rocks and the Rock Cycle | Geology View original
Is this image relevant?
Erosion and Deposition by Streams | Physical Geography View original
Is this image relevant?
Overview of Relative Age and Orientation of Geologic Layers – Laboratory Manual for Earth Science View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Natural vs cultural site formation
Erosion and Deposition by Streams | Physical Geography View original
Is this image relevant?
Overview of Relative Age and Orientation of Geologic Layers – Laboratory Manual for Earth Science View original
Is this image relevant?
Why It Matters: Rocks and the Rock Cycle | Geology View original
Is this image relevant?
Erosion and Deposition by Streams | Physical Geography View original
Is this image relevant?
Overview of Relative Age and Orientation of Geologic Layers – Laboratory Manual for Earth Science View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Natural site formation processes occur without human intervention through means such as erosion, deposition (alluvial, colluvial, aeolian), and bioturbation (, )
Cultural site formation processes result from human activities including construction (houses, walls, roads), abandonment (, de facto refuse), and (primary at use location, secondary away from use location)
Natural processes in archaeology
Erosion removes sediment or soil by wind, water, or ice which can expose or destroy archaeological remains (artifacts, features, sites)
Deposition accumulates sediment or soil and can bury and preserve archaeological remains through:
by flowing water (rivers, streams)
by gravity on slopes (hillsides, cliffs)
by wind (sand dunes, loess)
Bioturbation disturbs sediment or soil by living organisms and can displace or damage archaeological remains through:
Animal burrowing (rodents, insects)
Root growth from plants and trees
(ants, termites)
Cultural processes in site formation
Construction builds structures or features that can create new archaeological contexts such as:
Residential buildings (houses, apartments)
Defensive structures (walls, palisades)
Infrastructure (roads, bridges)
Activity areas (hearths, storage pits)
Abandonment is the deliberate or unintentional leaving of a site which can lead to:
Site decay and collapse of structures
Deposition of de facto refuse (items left behind during abandonment)
Refuse disposal is the intentional discard of waste materials that can create distinct archaeological deposits in the form of:
discarded at the location of use (food waste near a hearth)
discarded away from the location of use (trash pits, middens)
Post-depositional impact on remains
mixes or displaces archaeological remains due to bioturbation, erosion, or human activities (plowing, looting) which can affect the spatial and of a site
changes the chemical composition of archaeological materials caused by soil acidity, moisture, or temperature fluctuations leading to the deterioration or preservation of organic remains (bone, wood, plant fibers)
varies the degree of preservation based on material properties where organic materials (textiles, leather) degrade faster than inorganic materials (stone tools, pottery), creating biases in the archaeological record
Implications for interpretation mean that post-depositional processes can affect the reliability and representativeness of archaeological data, requiring archaeologists to consider their impact when interpreting a site (, )