11.3 Liberal theology and fundamentalism

Liberal theology and fundamentalism represent two contrasting responses to modernity within Christianity. These movements emerged in the 19th and early 20th centuries, reshaping how believers interpreted scripture, viewed tradition, and engaged with the world around them.

The clash between liberal and fundamentalist perspectives sparked heated debates, institutional splits, and lasting cultural impacts. Their divergent approaches to biblical interpretation, science, and social issues continue to shape Christian thought and practice in the modern era.

Liberal Theology

Key Characteristics and Concepts

Top images from around the web for Key Characteristics and Concepts

• 

  The characterisation of the Spiritual Christian: In conversation with God according to 1 ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Interfaith dialogue - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Bible and ethics: Pathways for dialogue View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The characterisation of the Spiritual Christian: In conversation with God according to 1 ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Interfaith dialogue - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Key Characteristics and Concepts

• 

  The characterisation of the Spiritual Christian: In conversation with God according to 1 ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Interfaith dialogue - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The Bible and ethics: Pathways for dialogue View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  The characterisation of the Spiritual Christian: In conversation with God according to 1 ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Interfaith dialogue - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Liberal theology emerged in the 19th century reinterpreted Christian doctrine in light of modern knowledge and scientific advancements
• Emphasized reason and experience over tradition and dogma
• Engaged with modern biblical criticism
• Focused on ethical teachings of Jesus rather than supernatural elements
• Interpreted biblical narratives symbolically or metaphorically rather than literally
• Viewed biblical stories as expressions of human religious experience rather than historical fact
• Embraced divine immanence emphasized God's presence within the world and human consciousness
• Prioritized social justice and moral progress
• Viewed Christianity as a force for positive social change and human betterment
• Embraced religious pluralism recognized value in other faith traditions
• Sought interfaith dialogue and cooperation

Prominent Figures and Contributions

• Friedrich Schleiermacher pioneered modern liberal theology
  • Emphasized religious experience and feeling as the core of faith
  • Developed concept of "God-consciousness"
• Adolf von Harnack focused on historical Jesus and ethical teachings
  • Wrote influential work "What is Christianity?"
  • Emphasized Jesus' moral teachings over dogmatic theology
• Rudolf Bultmann developed program of demythologization
  • Sought to interpret New Testament in light of modern worldview
  • Emphasized existential meaning of biblical texts

Fundamentalism as a Response

Origins and Core Beliefs

• Emerged in early 20th century as conservative Protestant reaction against liberal theology, modernism, and secularization
• Term "fundamentalism" derived from pamphlet series "The Fundamentals" (1910-1915)
• Outlined core doctrines considered essential to Christian faith
• Defended "fundamentals" of Christian belief included:
  • Biblical inerrancy
  • Virgin birth
  • Divinity of Christ
  • Substitutionary atonement
  • Bodily resurrection and second coming of Christ
• Emphasized literal interpretation of the Bible
• Rejected higher criticism and modern scientific theories contradicting biblical accounts

Development and Influence

• Scopes "Monkey Trial" of 1925 became symbolic battleground between fundamentalist and modernist perspectives
  • Centered on teaching of evolution in schools
  • Highlighted tension between religious belief and scientific education
• Gained strength through establishment of Bible institutes (Moody Bible Institute)
• Organized conferences (Niagara Bible Conference) promoted fundamentalist teachings
• Created publications (The Fundamentalist) disseminated fundamentalist views
• Influenced by broader social and cultural changes included:
  • Urbanization
  • Immigration
  • Shifts in traditional moral values
• Responded to perceived threats to traditional Christian beliefs and practices

Liberal vs Fundamentalist Interpretation

Approaches to Biblical Texts

• Liberal interpretations employed historical-critical methods
  • Considered historical and cultural context of biblical texts
  • Analyzed authorship, date, and literary genre of scriptures
• Fundamentalist approaches emphasized literal, plain-sense meaning
  • Rejected allegorical or symbolic interpretations unless explicitly indicated
  • Viewed Bible as clear and self-interpreting
• Liberals viewed Bible as human document inspired by divine revelation
• Fundamentalists asserted Bible's divine authorship and inerrancy in all matters
• Progressive revelation more common in liberal theology
  • Allowed for evolving understandings of God's nature and will
• Fundamentalists emphasized unchanging nature of biblical truth
• Liberals prioritized ethical teachings and broader themes of scripture
• Fundamentalists defended historicity of all biblical narratives (Creation account in Genesis)

Role of Tradition and Scholarship

• Liberal approaches incorporated insights from secular scholarship
  • Integrated findings from archaeology (Dead Sea Scrolls)
  • Drew on comparative religion studies (parallels with other ancient Near Eastern texts)
• Fundamentalist interpretations often resisted such integration
  • Viewed secular scholarship with suspicion
  • Prioritized traditional theological interpretations
• Liberals more open to reinterpreting traditional doctrines
• Fundamentalists more likely to adhere to established orthodox interpretations
• Role of church authority differed between approaches
  • Liberals emphasized individual interpretation and reason
  • Fundamentalists valued traditional ecclesiastical authority

Modernist-Fundamentalist Controversy

Institutional and Denominational Impact

• Led to significant denominational splits reshaped landscape of American Protestantism
  • Northern Baptist Convention split over fundamentalist-modernist issues
  • Presbyterian Church experienced schism resulting in Orthodox Presbyterian Church
• Contributed to development of neo-evangelicalism
  • Sought middle ground between fundamentalism and liberalism
  • Influenced figures like Billy Graham
  • Shaped institutions like Fuller Theological Seminary
• Affected Christian higher education
  • Established liberal seminaries (Union Theological Seminary)
  • Created conservative Bible colleges (Bob Jones University)
• Intensified public discourse on relationship between faith and science
  • Debates over evolution and age of Earth
  • Discussions on compatibility of modern science and biblical faith

Societal and Political Implications

• Influenced political alignments
  • Fundamentalism became associated with conservative politics
  • Liberal theology often aligned with more progressive political movements
• Shaped approaches to Christian missions and evangelism
  • Fundamentalists emphasized personal conversion
  • Liberals focused more on social reform and interfaith dialogue
• Legacy continues to influence contemporary discussions within Christianity
  • Debates over biblical authority
  • Disagreements on social issues (LGBTQ+ rights, gender roles)
  • Discussions on church's role in modern society
• Impacted public perception of Christianity
  • Media portrayals often emphasized conflict between science and religion
  • Shaped cultural stereotypes of religious conservatives and liberals