The Bible's formation involved a complex process of selecting and authorizing texts. The Old Testament canon developed gradually over centuries, while the New Testament canon was more deliberately formed between the 2nd and 4th centuries CE.
Key criteria for canonicity included apostolic authorship, orthodoxy , and widespread acceptance. The concept of biblical authority emerged, establishing the Bible as the primary source for Christian doctrine and practice. This shaped interpretation methods and influenced various aspects of Christian life.
Historical Process of Old Testament Canon
Top images from around the web for Historical Process of Old Testament Canon Development of the Old Testament canon - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Development of the Old Testament canon - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Development of the Old Testament canon - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Top images from around the web for Historical Process of Old Testament Canon Development of the Old Testament canon - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Development of the Old Testament canon - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
Development of the Old Testament canon - Wikipedia View original
Is this image relevant?
1 of 3
Term "canon" refers to official list of books recognized as authoritative Scripture by Christian church
Old Testament canon formation occurred gradually over several centuries
Hebrew Bible largely settled by 2nd century BCE
Septuagint (Greek translation of Hebrew Bible) played significant role in early Christian church's acceptance
New Testament canon formation more deliberate process between 2nd and 4th centuries CE
Muratorian Fragment (late 2nd century CE) earliest known list of authoritative New Testament books
Council of Carthage (397 CE) officially recognized 27 books for Western church
Eastern Orthodox Church finalized canon at Synod of Jerusalem (1672)
Includes additional Old Testament books compared to Protestant canon
Gradual acceptance of Hebrew scriptures by Jewish communities (500 BCE - 100 CE)
Emergence of Christian writings and letters (50 CE - 150 CE)
Marcion's heretical canon prompts orthodox response (140 CE)
Irenaeus defends four Gospels (180 CE)
Origen's writings influence canon discussions (3rd century CE)
Constantine commissions Bible manuscripts (4th century CE)
Jerome's Latin Vulgate translation (late 4th century CE)
Regional councils affirm canon lists (4th-5th centuries CE)
Criteria for Canonicity
Apostolic and Doctrinal Considerations
Apostolic authorship or association ensured direct connection to Jesus' teachings
Examples: Pauline epistles, Gospel of Matthew
Orthodoxy maintained consistency with accepted Christian doctrine
Excluded texts: Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Judas
Catholicity required widespread acceptance across different Christian communities
Examples: Letters of Paul, Gospels
Antiquity evaluated book's age and historical proximity to described events
Excluded later writings (2nd-3rd century pseudepigrapha)
Inspiration and Tradition
Inspiration reflected belief in divine origin of text
Example: 2 Timothy 3:16-17 describes Scripture as "God-breathed"
Old Testament books recognized within Jewish tradition and worship
Torah, Prophets, Writings (Tanakh)
Canonization process involved formal church councils and informal consensus
Example: Council of Hippo (393 CE), Council of Carthage (397 CE)
Use in liturgy and worship contributed to acceptance
Regular reading in church services (Gospels, Epistles)
Biblical Authority
Core Concepts of Biblical Authority
Biblical authority establishes Bible as primary source for Christian doctrine and practice
Doctrine of biblical inerrancy holds original manuscripts were without error
Supported by verses like Psalm 19:7, "The law of the Lord is perfect"
Biblical infallibility asserts Bible incapable of error in faith and practice
Allows for potential discrepancies in scientific or historical details
Principle of sola scriptura emphasizes Scripture alone as ultimate authority
Central to Protestant Reformation (16th century)
Implications and Interpretations
Different Christian traditions interpret biblical authority variously
Catholic Church balances Scripture with Church tradition
Eastern Orthodox emphasizes role of Church councils
Biblical authority influences interpretation methods
Literal interpretation (fundamentalist approaches)
Allegorical interpretation (early Church fathers)
Historical-critical method (modern scholarship)
Concept shapes Christian ethics, worship practices, and social engagement
Examples: views on marriage, liturgical practices, social justice issues
Canonical vs Non-Canonical Books
Canonical Books Overview
Protestant Old Testament canon consists of 39 books
Catholic and Orthodox canons include additional Deuterocanonical/Apocryphal books
Examples: Tobit, Judith, 1 and 2 Maccabees
New Testament canon consistent across most Christian traditions (27 books)
4 Gospels, Acts, 13 Pauline epistles, 8 General epistles, Revelation
Non-Canonical Texts and Their Significance
Non-canonical books include pseudepigrapha, apocrypha , and other early Christian writings
Pseudepigrapha: texts falsely attributed to biblical figures (Book of Enoch)
Apocrypha: works of unknown authorship or doubtful authenticity (Gospel of Peter)
Examples of non-canonical texts widely read in early Christianity
Gospel of Thomas (collection of Jesus' sayings)
Shepherd of Hermas (apocalyptic work)
Epistle of Barnabas (early Christian treatise)
Some non-canonical books considered canonical by certain traditions
Ethiopian Orthodox Church accepts Book of Enoch and Jubilees
Study of non-canonical texts provides insights into early Christian thought
Reveals diversity of beliefs and practices in early church
Helps contextualize development of orthodox doctrine