11.2 The mind-body problem and its implications

The mind-body problem tackles the relationship between our mental states and physical processes. It questions how our thoughts and feelings interact with our physical bodies, shaping our understanding of consciousness, identity, and free will.

Dualist approaches see mind and body as separate, while monist views see them as one substance. Arguments for each position grapple with issues like mental causation, the hard problem of consciousness, and personal identity, influencing our views on reality and the mind's place in it.

The Mind-Body Problem

Central question of mind-body problem

Top images from around the web for Central question of mind-body problem

• 

  Information Philosopher Books - Great Problems in Philosophy (and Physics) SOLVED? View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Mind–body problem - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Neural Correlates of Consciousness Meet the Theory of Identity View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information Philosopher Books - Great Problems in Philosophy (and Physics) SOLVED? View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Mind–body problem - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Central question of mind-body problem

• 

  Information Philosopher Books - Great Problems in Philosophy (and Physics) SOLVED? View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Mind–body problem - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Neural Correlates of Consciousness Meet the Theory of Identity View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Information Philosopher Books - Great Problems in Philosophy (and Physics) SOLVED? View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Mind–body problem - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Asks about relationship between mental states and physical states or processes seeks to understand how non-physical or immaterial mind can interact with physical body
• Arises from apparent differences between mental phenomena (thoughts, feelings, perceptions) and physical phenomena (brain states, bodily processes)
• Significant for understanding consciousness, personal identity, free will
• Affects approach to psychology, neuroscience, artificial intelligence
• Shapes views on nature of reality and place of mind in universe

Dualist vs monist approaches

• Dualist approaches assert mind and body are fundamentally distinct substances or properties
  • Substance dualism (René Descartes) holds mind and body are two separate substances mental states are non-physical and irreducible to physical states mind is non-extended, thinking substance body is extended, non-thinking substance
  • Property dualism maintains mental properties are irreducible to physical properties, even if instantiated by physical substances mental properties (qualia, subjective experiences) cannot be fully explained by physical properties
• Monist approaches assert mind and body are ultimately composed of same substance or properties
  • Physicalism holds everything is ultimately physical or supervenes on physical mental states are identical to brain states or caused by and dependent on physical processes
  • Idealism asserts everything is ultimately mental or composed of ideas physical objects and properties are constructions of mind or dependent on mental states for existence
  • Neutral monism proposes mental and physical properties are reducible to more basic, neutral substance or property that is neither mental nor physical but can give rise to both

Arguments and Implications

Arguments for competing positions

• Arguments for dualism:
  • Conceivability argument we can conceive of mind existing without body, suggesting they are distinct substances or properties
  • Knowledge argument knowing all physical facts about color perception does not entail knowing what it is like to experience color, indicating non-physical facts about consciousness
  • Explanatory gap physical explanations seem unable to fully account for subjective, qualitative aspects of mental states
• Arguments against dualism:
  • Interaction problem if mind and body are distinct substances, unclear how they can causally interact
  • Problem of mental causation if mental states are non-physical, difficult to explain how they can have causal effects in physical world
  • Ockham's razor dualism posits additional substance or properties, may be unnecessary if mental phenomena can be explained by physical processes
• Arguments for monism:
  • Success of physical explanations many mental phenomena (perception, memory) can be explained in terms of physical processes in brain
  • Principle of simplicity monism provides more parsimonious ontology by positing only one kind of substance or property
  • Causal closure of physical if all physical effects have sufficient physical causes, may be no room for non-physical mental causes
• Arguments against monism:
  • Hard problem of consciousness physicalist theories struggle to explain subjective, qualitative aspects of consciousness (what it feels like to see red or taste coffee)
  • Multiple realizability of mental states same mental state (pain) can be realized by different physical systems, suggesting mental states are not identical to specific physical states
  • Normativity of mental content mental states (beliefs, desires) have normative properties (being true or false), difficult to reduce to purely physical properties

Implications of mind-body solutions

• Mental causation:
  • Dualist theories must explain how non-physical mental states can causally interact with physical states, avoiding overdetermination problem
  • Physicalist theories must account for apparent causal efficacy of mental states, either by reducing them to physical states or explaining how they can be causally relevant without being causally efficacious
• Free will:
  • Dualist theories may be more compatible with libertarian free will non-physical mind could be source of uncaused free choices
  • Physicalist theories may be more compatible with compatibilist free will mental states, even if determined by physical processes, could still be proximate causes of actions
• Personal identity:
  • Dualist theories may ground personal identity in continuity of non-physical mental substance (soul, ego)
  • Physicalist theories may ground personal identity in continuity of physical or functional states (continuity of brain or psychological states)
  • Theories that deny existence of persistent self (Buddhist anatta) may challenge both dualist and physicalist accounts of personal identity