3.3 RISC and CISC architectures

RISC and CISC are two key approaches to computer architecture. RISC aims for simplicity with fewer, faster instructions, while CISC offers complex instructions that do more in one go. Each has pros and cons for performance and programming.

Understanding these designs is crucial for grasping how processors work. RISC focuses on efficiency through simplicity, while CISC prioritizes versatility with powerful instructions. This shapes how we build and program computers today.

RISC vs CISC Architectures

Fundamental Design Philosophies

Top images from around the web for Fundamental Design Philosophies

• 

  Computer architecture - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Like this document? Why not share! View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  DSHR's Blog: RISC vs. CISC View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Computer architecture - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Like this document? Why not share! View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Fundamental Design Philosophies

• 

  Computer architecture - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Like this document? Why not share! View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  DSHR's Blog: RISC vs. CISC View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Computer architecture - Wikipedia View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Like this document? Why not share! View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computing) and CISC (Complex Instruction Set Computing) represent two fundamental design philosophies for computer architectures
• RISC architectures prioritize a simplified and optimized instruction set, aiming to execute instructions in a single clock cycle
  • RISC processors feature a fixed-length instruction format and a large number of registers (e.g., 32 or more)
  • RISC architectures focus on hardware simplicity and rely on optimizing compilers to achieve performance
• CISC architectures offer a rich and complex instruction set, allowing a single instruction to perform multiple operations
  • CISC processors have variable-length instructions and fewer registers compared to RISC (e.g., 8 or 16)
  • CISC architectures emphasize complex hardware to support a wide range of instructions and reduce the burden on compilers

Architectural Differences

• RISC processors typically follow a load-store architecture, where memory access is performed through explicit load and store instructions
  • Example: In RISC, adding two numbers from memory requires separate load, add, and store instructions
• CISC processors allow memory access as part of complex instructions
  • Example: In CISC, a single instruction can load operands from memory, perform the addition, and store the result back to memory
• RISC architectures strive to reduce the complexity of the control unit and minimize the number of clock cycles per instruction (CPI)
• CISC architectures aim to reduce the number of instructions per program (IPP) by providing complex instructions that perform multiple operations

Advantages and Disadvantages of RISC vs CISC

RISC Advantages and Disadvantages

• Advantages of RISC architectures:
  • Simpler hardware design leads to faster clock speeds and lower power consumption
  • Reduced instruction decoding complexity enables faster instruction execution
  • Large number of registers minimizes the need for memory accesses, improving performance
  • Highly pipelined execution facilitates parallel processing of instructions
• Disadvantages of RISC architectures:
  • Increased program size due to the need for more instructions to perform complex operations
  • Higher reliance on compiler optimization to achieve performance gains
  • Potential performance limitations for complex, non-optimized code

CISC Advantages and Disadvantages

• Advantages of CISC architectures:
  • Reduced program size as complex instructions can perform multiple operations
  • Easier assembly language programming due to the availability of high-level instructions
  • Backward compatibility with existing software
• Disadvantages of CISC architectures:
  • Complex hardware design results in slower clock speeds and higher power consumption
  • Longer instruction decoding time negatively impacts performance
  • Difficulty in implementing efficient pipelining due to variable-length instructions and complex dependencies

Impact of RISC vs CISC on Performance and Programming

Performance Considerations

• RISC architectures prioritize instruction-level parallelism (ILP) through pipelining and superscalar execution
  • Multiple instructions can be executed simultaneously, leading to higher performance in well-optimized code
  • Example: RISC processors like ARM and MIPS leverage pipelining to achieve high performance in embedded systems and mobile devices
• CISC architectures rely on complex instructions to reduce the number of instructions required for a given task
  • Complex instructions may take multiple clock cycles to execute, potentially impacting performance
  • Example: x86 processors, which are CISC-based, use techniques like micro-op translation to break down complex instructions into simpler operations for execution

Programming and Compiler Implications

• RISC architectures require more instructions to perform complex operations, placing a greater burden on compilers to optimize code for performance
  • RISC programming often involves careful instruction scheduling and register allocation to maximize pipeline efficiency
  • Example: Compilers for RISC architectures, such as GCC and LLVM, employ advanced optimization techniques to generate efficient code
• CISC architectures provide a rich set of instructions, making assembly language programming more expressive and reducing the need for complex compiler optimizations
  • However, the variable-length instructions and complex dependencies can make compiler optimization challenging
  • Example: Assembly language programming for x86 processors allows direct use of complex instructions, but optimizing compilers face challenges due to the CISC nature
• The choice between RISC and CISC architectures influences the design of instruction set architectures (ISAs) and the development of compilers and programming languages
  • RISC ISAs tend to have a smaller number of simple instructions
  • CISC ISAs have a larger number of complex instructions
• Modern processors often incorporate elements from both RISC and CISC architectures, leveraging the advantages of each approach
  • Example: Some CISC processors, like modern x86 processors, internally convert complex instructions into simpler RISC-like micro-operations for execution