14.2 Adaptive and Robust Control

Adaptive and robust control are two powerful approaches for handling uncertainties in dynamic systems. Adaptive control adjusts parameters on the fly, while robust control maintains stability despite known uncertainties. Both techniques use specialized methods to ensure system performance under varying conditions.

These advanced control strategies are crucial for dealing with real-world complexities in dynamic systems. By automatically adapting or designing for robustness, engineers can create more reliable and effective control systems across various applications, from robotics to aerospace.

Adaptive vs Robust Control

Key Differences

Top images from around the web for Key Differences

• 

  Frontiers | Robust Model Predictive Control for Dynamics Compensation in Real-Time Hybrid Simulation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Approaches to Cognitive Modeling in Dynamic Systems Control View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Robust Model Predictive Control for Dynamics Compensation in Real-Time Hybrid Simulation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Approaches to Cognitive Modeling in Dynamic Systems Control View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

Top images from around the web for Key Differences

• 

  Frontiers | Robust Model Predictive Control for Dynamics Compensation in Real-Time Hybrid Simulation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Approaches to Cognitive Modeling in Dynamic Systems Control View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Robust Model Predictive Control for Dynamics Compensation in Real-Time Hybrid Simulation View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Approaches to Cognitive Modeling in Dynamic Systems Control View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 2

• Adaptive control automatically adjusts controller parameters to maintain desired performance in the presence of system uncertainties or variations
• Robust control designs controllers that maintain stability and performance despite uncertainties, disturbances, and modeling errors
• Adaptive control deals with systems with unknown or time-varying parameters
• Robust control focuses on handling uncertainties and disturbances with known bounds

Common Techniques

• Adaptive control methods include model reference adaptive control (MRAC), self-tuning regulators (STR), and gain scheduling
  • MRAC uses a reference model to specify desired closed-loop performance and adjusts controller parameters to minimize error between system output and reference model output
  • STR estimates system parameters online and updates controller parameters based on these estimates
  • Gain scheduling adjusts controller parameters based on operating conditions or system parameters measured or estimated in real-time
• Robust control techniques include H-infinity control, sliding mode control, and quantitative feedback theory (QFT)
  • H-infinity control minimizes worst-case gain from disturbances to system output, ensuring robustness against uncertainties and disturbances
  • Sliding mode control drives system state to a sliding surface and maintains it there, providing robustness against matched uncertainties and disturbances
  • QFT uses frequency-domain techniques to design controllers that meet performance specifications in the presence of uncertainties

Adaptive Controller Design

Adaptation Laws

• Adaptive control design involves choosing appropriate adaptation laws to update controller parameters
  • MIT rule adapts parameters to minimize the error between the system output and the reference model output
  • Lyapunov-based adaptation ensures stability by using a Lyapunov function to guide parameter updates
  • Gradient-based methods adjust parameters in the direction of the negative gradient of a cost function (mean squared error)
• Adaptive control systems require persistent excitation conditions to ensure parameter convergence and stability
  • Persistent excitation means the input signal must be sufficiently rich to excite all system modes and enable accurate parameter estimation
  • Lack of persistent excitation can lead to parameter drift, bursting, or slow convergence

Design Considerations

• Reference model selection impacts the desired closed-loop performance and the adaptation process
  • Reference model should be chosen to reflect the desired system behavior and be compatible with the plant dynamics
  • High-order reference models may improve performance but increase computational complexity and sensitivity to noise
• Adaptation gain tuning affects the speed of adaptation and the system's sensitivity to disturbances
  • High adaptation gains lead to faster adaptation but may cause overshoots, oscillations, or instability
  • Low adaptation gains result in slower adaptation but provide more robustness to disturbances and modeling errors
• Initialization of adaptive controller parameters influences the initial transient response and convergence time
  • Proper initialization based on prior knowledge or system identification can improve the initial performance and reduce adaptation time
  • Poor initialization may cause large transients, slow convergence, or even instability

Adaptive Control System Analysis

Stability Analysis

• Lyapunov stability theory is used to analyze the stability of adaptive control systems
  • Lyapunov functions are constructed to prove that the tracking error and parameter estimation errors converge to zero
  • Lyapunov-based adaptive laws ensure stability by adapting parameters in the direction of the negative gradient of the Lyapunov function
• Robust adaptive control techniques address stability in the presence of bounded disturbances and modeling errors
  • Dead-zone modification prevents adaptation when the error is within a specified dead-zone, reducing sensitivity to noise and disturbances
  • Projection operators constrain the parameter estimates within a known bounded region, preventing parameter drift and ensuring stability

Performance Evaluation

• Performance metrics for adaptive control systems include tracking error, transient response, and robustness
  • Tracking error measures the difference between the system output and the desired reference trajectory
  • Transient response characteristics (settling time, overshoot, rise time) indicate how quickly and smoothly the system adapts to changes
  • Robustness metrics (gain and phase margins, sensitivity functions) quantify the system's ability to maintain performance under uncertainties and disturbances
• Simulation and experimental validation are essential to assess the stability and performance of adaptive control systems
  • Numerical simulations help evaluate the system's behavior under various scenarios and parameter variations
  • Hardware-in-the-loop testing and real-world experiments validate the controller's performance in practical applications

Robust Control Techniques

Uncertainty Modeling

• Robust control design involves modeling uncertainties and disturbances and incorporating them into the control design process
  • Additive uncertainty represents unmodeled dynamics or external disturbances added to the nominal system
  • Multiplicative uncertainty describes variations in the system gain or dynamics that scale with the nominal system
  • Parametric uncertainty arises from imprecise knowledge of system parameters or their variations within known bounds
• Uncertainty descriptions are used to define the set of possible system behaviors and guide the robust control design
  • Norm-bounded uncertainty models (H-infinity, L1) characterize uncertainties using their maximum gain or norm
  • Structured uncertainty models (parametric, dynamic) provide more detailed descriptions of the uncertainty sources and their interconnections

Robustness Analysis

• Robust stability and performance analysis techniques assess the robustness of the control system
  • Small-gain theorem ensures stability if the product of the system gain and the uncertainty gain is less than unity
  • Passivity theory guarantees stability for systems that dissipate energy and have passive uncertainties
  • Structured singular value (μ) analysis quantifies the robustness margin against structured uncertainties
• Robustness margins indicate the system's tolerance to uncertainties and disturbances
  • Gain margin represents the maximum allowable gain variation before instability occurs
  • Phase margin measures the maximum allowable phase shift before instability occurs
  • Delay margin quantifies the maximum allowable time delay before instability occurs