Language attitudes and ideologies shape how we perceive and use language. They're influenced by social factors like age, gender, and class. These beliefs can lead to positive or negative views of different language varieties, affecting speakers' experiences and opportunities.
promotes one "correct" form, often stigmatizing non-standard varieties. This can create and discrimination. studies how people view language differences, revealing and stereotypes that impact social interactions and language use.
Defining language attitudes
Language attitudes refer to the feelings, beliefs, and opinions that individuals or groups hold towards different languages, dialects, accents, or language varieties
These attitudes can be positive, negative, or neutral and are shaped by various social, cultural, and historical factors
Language attitudes play a crucial role in shaping language use, language policies, and social interactions within a community
Conscious vs unconscious attitudes
Top images from around the web for Conscious vs unconscious attitudes
Cognitive Biases - Sensemaking Resources, Education, and Community View original
Conscious attitudes are explicit and openly expressed opinions about language varieties or language use
Unconscious attitudes are implicit biases or preferences that individuals may not be aware of but can still influence their language behavior and perceptions
Unconscious attitudes can be revealed through indirect methods such as matched-guise tests or implicit association tests
Positive vs negative attitudes
Positive attitudes towards a language or dialect can lead to increased use, valorization, and preservation of that variety
Negative attitudes can result in stigmatization, discrimination, and marginalization of speakers of certain language varieties
Negative attitudes can also contribute to language shift or abandonment as speakers may feel pressure to adopt more prestigious varieties
Individual vs societal attitudes
Individual attitudes are personal beliefs and opinions held by a single person about language varieties or language use
Societal attitudes are collective beliefs and opinions shared by a larger group or community about language varieties or language use
Societal attitudes can be influenced by factors such as media representation, language policies, and historical events
Individual attitudes can vary within a society and may be influenced by personal experiences, education, and social networks
Defining language ideologies
Language ideologies are sets of beliefs, values, and cultural assumptions about language that are shared by members of a speech community
These ideologies shape how language is used, evaluated, and regulated within a society
Language ideologies are often tied to broader social, political, and economic structures and can serve to maintain or challenge existing power relations
Relationship between attitudes and ideologies
Language attitudes are individual or group evaluations of language varieties, while language ideologies are broader systems of belief that underlie these attitudes
Language ideologies can shape language attitudes by promoting certain values or assumptions about language use and variation
Language attitudes can also reinforce or challenge dominant language ideologies within a society
Dominant vs minority ideologies
Dominant language ideologies are those that are widely accepted and promoted by powerful institutions such as government, media, and education systems
Minority language ideologies are those held by marginalized or subordinate groups within a society that may challenge or resist dominant ideologies
Dominant ideologies often serve to maintain the status quo and legitimize the power of certain language varieties or groups
Minority ideologies can provide alternative perspectives on language and challenge the hegemony of dominant ideologies
Ideologies as systems of belief
Language ideologies are not just individual opinions but are part of larger systems of belief that are shared by members of a speech community
These systems of belief are often unconscious and taken for granted by members of a society
Language ideologies can be deeply embedded in cultural practices, social institutions, and everyday interactions
Analyzing language ideologies requires examining the historical, social, and political contexts in which they emerge and are reproduced
Role of social factors
Language attitudes and ideologies are shaped by various social factors such as age, gender, social class, race, and ethnicity
These factors can influence how individuals perceive and evaluate different language varieties and how they use language in social interactions
Social factors can also intersect and interact in complex ways to shape language attitudes and ideologies
Influence of age on attitudes
Age can influence language attitudes as different generations may have different experiences with and exposure to language varieties
Older generations may hold more conservative attitudes towards language use and variation, while younger generations may be more open to linguistic diversity
Age-graded patterns of language use can also shape attitudes as certain varieties may be associated with particular age groups (youth slang)
Influence of gender on attitudes
Gender can shape language attitudes as different language varieties or features may be associated with masculinity or femininity
Women may be expected to use more standard or prestigious varieties, while men may have more leeway to use non-standard or vernacular forms
Gender ideologies can also intersect with language ideologies to shape attitudes towards language use and variation
Influence of social class on attitudes
Social class can influence language attitudes as certain varieties may be associated with particular socioeconomic groups (working-class accents)
Higher social classes may have more access to education and standard language varieties, while lower classes may use more non-standard or vernacular forms
Language can also serve as a marker of social class and can be used to assert or challenge class identities
Influence of race and ethnicity on attitudes
Race and ethnicity can shape language attitudes as certain varieties may be associated with particular racial or ethnic groups (African American Vernacular English)
Language can serve as a marker of ethnic or racial identity and can be used to assert or challenge these identities
Racial and ethnic ideologies can intersect with language ideologies to shape attitudes towards language use and variation
can also be a form of racial or ethnic discrimination as speakers of certain varieties may face prejudice or discrimination based on their language use
Standard language ideology
Standard language ideology is a widespread belief that there is a single, correct, and proper form of a language that should be used in all contexts
This ideology promotes the idea that non-standard varieties are inferior, incorrect, or inappropriate for use in formal or public settings
Standard language ideology is often tied to ideas of national identity, social class, and education
Defining standard languages
Standard languages are codified and prescribed varieties of a language that are considered the most correct or appropriate for use in formal contexts (education, media, government)
Standard languages are often based on the language use of socially dominant groups and may not reflect the linguistic diversity of a speech community
The process of standardization involves the selection, codification, and elaboration of a particular variety as the standard
Prestige of standard varieties
Standard language varieties are often associated with prestige, power, and social mobility
Speakers of standard varieties may be perceived as more educated, intelligent, or competent than speakers of non-standard varieties
The prestige of standard varieties can lead to linguistic insecurity among speakers of non-standard varieties who may feel pressure to conform to the standard
Stigmatization of non-standard varieties
Non-standard language varieties are often stigmatized and devalued within a standard language ideology
Speakers of non-standard varieties may face discrimination, prejudice, or negative stereotyping based on their language use
Non-standard varieties may be seen as markers of lower social class, lack of education, or cultural backwardness
The stigmatization of non-standard varieties can lead to linguistic self-hatred and the abandonment of minority language varieties
Standard language and power
Standard language ideology is closely tied to power relations within a society
The promotion of a standard variety often serves the interests of socially dominant groups who have the power to define what counts as legitimate or proper language use
Access to standard language varieties can be a form of linguistic capital that can provide social, economic, or educational advantages
The imposition of a standard variety can also be a form of that marginalizes or suppresses minority language varieties and identities
Perceptual dialectology
Perceptual dialectology is the study of how non-linguists perceive and categorize language variation and dialect differences
This approach examines the folk beliefs, , and stereotypes that people have about language varieties and their speakers
Perceptual dialectology can provide insights into how language attitudes and ideologies are formed and reproduced within a speech community
Folk beliefs about language variation
Folk beliefs are common-sense understandings or lay theories that people have about language variation and dialect differences
These beliefs may not always align with linguistic reality but can still shape language attitudes and behavior
Folk beliefs can include ideas about the correctness, pleasantness, or intelligibility of different language varieties (Southern accents are friendly)
Mental maps of dialect regions
Mental maps are cognitive representations that people have of the geographic distribution of language varieties and dialect regions
These maps may not always correspond to actual linguistic boundaries but can still shape perceptions and attitudes towards different varieties
Mental maps can be influenced by factors such as media representation, personal experience, and cultural stereotypes
Stereotypes associated with dialects
Language varieties are often associated with particular stereotypes or social characteristics based on the perceived traits of their speakers
These stereotypes can be positive or negative and can shape attitudes towards the language variety and its speakers (New Yorkers are rude)
Stereotypes can also lead to or discrimination as speakers may be judged based on their language use rather than their individual qualities
Accuracy of perceptual dialectology
Perceptual dialectology can provide valuable insights into how language attitudes and ideologies are formed and reproduced within a speech community
However, folk beliefs and mental maps may not always align with linguistic reality and can perpetuate stereotypes or misunderstandings about language variation
It is important to critically examine the accuracy and implications of perceptual dialectology and to consider how these beliefs may shape language use and social interactions
Language attitudes in education
Language attitudes can have a significant impact on educational practices, policies, and outcomes
Schools are often sites where dominant language ideologies are reproduced and where language attitudes can shape student experiences and achievement
Examining language attitudes in education can provide insights into how linguistic diversity is valued or devalued within educational settings
Teacher attitudes toward student language
Teacher attitudes towards student language can shape classroom interactions, instructional practices, and student outcomes
Teachers may have positive or negative attitudes towards non-standard varieties or may view them as obstacles to learning
Teacher attitudes can also influence student attitudes towards their own language varieties and can contribute to linguistic insecurity or self-esteem
Impact of attitudes on student achievement
Negative attitudes towards student language can lead to lower expectations, reduced academic engagement, and poorer educational outcomes
Students who speak non-standard varieties may face linguistic bias or discrimination that can impact their academic performance and motivation
Positive attitudes towards linguistic diversity can create more inclusive and equitable learning environments that value student language as a resource
Attitudes toward bilingual education
Attitudes towards bilingual education can vary depending on the social, political, and linguistic context
Some may view bilingual education as a threat to national unity or as a hindrance to English language acquisition
Others may see bilingual education as a valuable resource that promotes linguistic and cultural diversity and supports academic achievement for language minority students
Attitudes towards bilingual education can shape educational policies and practices and can impact the experiences of bilingual students and families
Attitudes toward non-standard varieties in schools
Non-standard language varieties are often stigmatized or devalued within educational settings
Students who speak non-standard varieties may be viewed as deficient or in need of remediation rather than as possessing valuable linguistic resources
Schools may enforce standard language norms through policies or practices that discourage or punish the use of non-standard varieties
Attitudes towards non-standard varieties in schools can contribute to the marginalization or exclusion of linguistically diverse students and can perpetuate linguistic inequality
Language attitudes in the workplace
Language attitudes can also shape language use and social interactions within the workplace
Workplace language policies and practices can reflect dominant language ideologies and can impact the experiences and opportunities of linguistically diverse workers
Examining language attitudes in the workplace can provide insights into how linguistic diversity is valued or devalued within professional settings
Linguistic profiling in hiring
Linguistic profiling refers to the practice of judging or discriminating against job applicants based on their language use or accent
Employers may have conscious or unconscious biases towards certain language varieties or may view them as indicators of job-relevant skills or qualities
Linguistic profiling can lead to discrimination in hiring and can limit employment opportunities for speakers of non-standard or minority language varieties
Accent discrimination in employment
refers to the unequal treatment or evaluation of workers based on their accent or pronunciation
Workers with non-native or non-standard accents may face prejudice, stereotyping, or harassment in the workplace
Accent discrimination can impact job performance evaluations, promotion opportunities, and overall job satisfaction for linguistically diverse workers
Language policies in the workplace
Workplaces may have explicit or implicit language policies that regulate language use and enforce linguistic norms
These policies may require the use of a standard variety, discourage the use of non-English languages, or restrict the use of non-standard varieties
Language policies can create linguistic barriers or challenges for workers who speak non-dominant language varieties and can contribute to linguistic inequality in the workplace
Attitudes toward multilingualism at work
Attitudes towards multilingualism in the workplace can vary depending on the linguistic and cultural context
Some workplaces may view multilingualism as a valuable resource that can enhance communication, cultural competence, and business opportunities
Others may view multilingualism as a hindrance to efficiency or as a threat to linguistic unity and may discourage or restrict the use of non-English languages
Attitudes towards multilingualism can shape language policies and practices in the workplace and can impact the experiences and opportunities of multilingual workers
Changing language attitudes and ideologies
Language attitudes and ideologies are not fixed or immutable but can change over time in response to social, political, and linguistic factors
Efforts to change language attitudes and ideologies can promote linguistic diversity, equity, and inclusion and can challenge dominant language hierarchies
Examining strategies for changing language attitudes and ideologies can provide insights into how to create more linguistically just and inclusive societies
Language awareness programs
aim to promote understanding and appreciation of linguistic diversity and to challenge negative attitudes towards non-standard varieties
These programs can take place in educational settings, workplaces, or community contexts and can involve activities such as dialect awareness training or multilingual storytelling
Language awareness programs can help individuals recognize and question their own language attitudes and biases and can promote more positive and inclusive language practices
Role of media in shaping attitudes
Media representations of language varieties and their speakers can shape public attitudes and ideologies about language
Negative or stereotypical portrayals of non-standard varieties in media can reinforce linguistic prejudices and contribute to the stigmatization of these varieties
Positive and diverse representations of linguistic diversity in media can promote more inclusive and equitable language attitudes and can challenge dominant language hierarchies
Grassroots efforts to promote linguistic diversity
Grassroots efforts by community members, activists, and educators can play a key role in promoting linguistic diversity and challenging negative language attitudes
These efforts can include language revitalization programs, community language classes, or advocacy campaigns for linguistic rights and recognition
Grassroots efforts can empower linguistically marginalized communities and can create spaces for valuing and celebrating linguistic diversity
Challenges in changing deeply held beliefs
Changing language attitudes and ideologies can be a challenging and long-term process, as these beliefs are often deeply ingrained and tied to broader social and political structures
Efforts to change attitudes may face resistance or backlash from those who benefit from existing language hierarchies or who view linguistic diversity as a threat
Changing attitudes requires not only individual awareness and action but also systemic changes in language policies, educational practices, and social institutions
Ongoing research, advocacy, and community engagement are needed to create more linguistically just and inclusive societies that value and support linguistic diversity