2.4 Pidgins and creoles

Pidgins and creoles are fascinating linguistic phenomena that arise from language contact. They emerge in situations where groups with different native languages need to communicate, often in contexts of social inequality like colonialism or slavery.

Pidgins start as simplified contact languages, while creoles develop when pidgins become nativized. This process involves expanding vocabulary and grammar, allowing creoles to serve as full-fledged languages for their communities. Understanding pidgins and creoles sheds light on language evolution and social dynamics.

Origins of pidgins

• Pidgins emerge as contact languages in situations where groups with different native languages need to communicate for trade, labor, or other purposes
• Pidgins typically arise in contexts of social inequality, such as slavery, indentured servitude, or colonialism
• Pidgins are not the native language of any group and have no native speakers

Pidgins as contact languages

Top images from around the web for Pidgins as contact languages

• 

  Frontiers | On the intercultural sensitivity of university students in multicultural regions: A ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Introduction to Language | Boundless Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Grammar Is a System That Characterizes Talk in Interaction View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | On the intercultural sensitivity of university students in multicultural regions: A ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Introduction to Language | Boundless Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Pidgins as contact languages

• 

  Frontiers | On the intercultural sensitivity of university students in multicultural regions: A ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Introduction to Language | Boundless Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Grammar Is a System That Characterizes Talk in Interaction View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | On the intercultural sensitivity of university students in multicultural regions: A ... View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Introduction to Language | Boundless Psychology View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Pidgins develop from the linguistic interaction between groups who do not share a common language
• They are improvised communication systems that draw vocabulary and grammatical elements from the languages in contact
• Pidgins have a limited vocabulary and simplified grammar compared to the source languages (superstrate and substrate languages)

Historical context for pidgin development

• Many pidgins emerged in the context of European colonialism and the Atlantic slave trade from the 16th to 19th centuries
• Pidgins developed on plantations, in slave forts, and in other colonial settings where Africans and Europeans interacted
• Examples of historical pidgins include Hawaiian Pidgin English, Nigerian Pidgin English, and Chinese Pidgin English

Key characteristics of pidgins

• Limited vocabulary, often drawn from the dominant language (superstrate) in the contact situation
• Simplified grammar with reduced inflectional morphology and a lack of complex syntactic structures
• Absence of native speakers, as pidgins are learned as second languages for specific purposes
• High degree of variability and instability in the early stages of development

Creole formation

• Creoles develop from pidgins that undergo linguistic expansion and nativization
• The process of creole formation involves the transformation of a pidgin into a full-fledged language with native speakers
• Creoles exhibit more complex grammar and a larger vocabulary than their pidgin predecessors

Nativization of pidgins

• Nativization occurs when children acquire a pidgin as their first language, often in the context of plantation slavery or other colonial settings
• As children acquire the pidgin, they introduce new grammatical features and expand its vocabulary
• Nativization marks the transition from a pidgin to a creole language

Expansion of pidgin vocabulary and grammar

• As a pidgin becomes a creole, its vocabulary expands to cover a wider range of semantic domains
• Grammatical structures become more complex, with the development of inflectional morphology, subordinate clauses, and other features
• The expanded vocabulary and grammar allow creoles to serve as full-fledged languages for their speech communities

Social factors in creole development

• Creole formation is influenced by social factors such as population demographics, power relations, and language attitudes
• The ratio of substrate language speakers to superstrate language speakers can affect the degree of substrate influence on the creole
• Social hierarchies and language prestige can shape the direction of creole development (e.g., decreolization)

Linguistic features of creoles

• Despite their diverse origins, creoles share many linguistic features due to similar sociohistorical circumstances of development
• Creoles also exhibit substrate influences from the languages of the subservient group in the contact situation
• Creoles have unique phonological, morphological, and syntactic properties that distinguish them from their source languages

Similarities vs differences among creoles

• Creoles share features such as a lack of inflectional morphology, a preference for analytic structures, and a tendency towards SVO word order
• However, creoles also differ based on their specific substrate and superstrate languages, as well as the unique social contexts of their development
• Examples of shared features include the use of serial verb constructions and the presence of preverbal tense-mood-aspect markers

Substrate influence on creole grammars

• The languages spoken by the subservient group in the contact situation (substrate languages) often leave an imprint on creole grammar
• Substrate influence can be seen in areas such as word order, grammatical categories, and semantic distinctions
• Examples of substrate influence include the use of tone in some Atlantic creoles (influenced by West African languages) and the presence of post-nominal determiners in French-based creoles (influenced by Bantu languages)

Creole phonology and lexicon

• Creole phonology often reflects a combination of superstrate and substrate language influences
• Creoles may exhibit phonological processes such as consonant cluster reduction, vowel epenthesis, and syllable structure simplification
• Creole lexicons are largely derived from the superstrate language, with varying degrees of substrate language contribution
• Examples of creole phonological features include the use of vowel harmony in some Caribbean creoles and the presence of click consonants in Afrikaans (influenced by Khoisan languages)

Theories of creole genesis

• Theories of creole genesis seek to explain the processes and mechanisms involved in the formation of creole languages
• These theories address questions such as the role of universal grammar, the influence of substrate languages, and the speed of creole development
• Major theories include the monogenetic theory, the language bioprogram hypothesis, and the gradualist approach

Monogenetic vs polygenetic theories

• Monogenetic theories propose that all creoles share a common origin and are genetically related
• Proponents of monogenesis argue for the existence of a Portuguese-based proto-creole that gave rise to other creoles through relexification
• Polygenetic theories maintain that creoles developed independently in different contact situations, drawing on the specific languages involved
• The polygenetic view emphasizes the role of universal linguistic tendencies and substrate influence in shaping creole structures

Language bioprogram hypothesis

• Proposed by Derek Bickerton, the language bioprogram hypothesis suggests that creole formation is guided by an innate biological blueprint for language
• According to this theory, children draw on universal grammar to create a new language when exposed to the limited input of a pidgin
• The bioprogram is thought to account for the structural similarities observed across creoles from different regions
• Critics of the bioprogram hypothesis argue that it understates the role of substrate languages and social factors in creole development

Gradualist vs catastrophic creolization

• Gradualist approaches to creolization emphasize the gradual, step-by-step development of creoles over an extended period
• Gradualists view creole formation as a process of incremental restructuring and expansion of pidgins
• Catastrophic creolization, also known as abrupt creolization, posits that creoles emerge rapidly, within a single generation
• Proponents of catastrophic creolization argue that the sudden social upheaval of plantation slavery or other colonial contexts triggers a rapid restructuring of the pidgin into a full-fledged creole
• The debate between gradualist and catastrophic creolization remains unresolved, with evidence supporting both positions

Social status of creoles

• Creole languages often face negative perceptions and stigmatization due to their association with marginalized groups and colonial histories
• Despite their linguistic complexity and expressive power, creoles are frequently viewed as "broken" or "inferior" versions of their lexifier languages
• Creole speakers may face discrimination and limited access to education and economic opportunities as a result of these negative attitudes

Negative perceptions of creole languages

• Creoles are often stigmatized as "non-standard" or "incorrect" forms of language
• These negative perceptions stem from the low social status of creole speakers and the historical association of creoles with slavery and colonialism
• Misconceptions about creoles include the belief that they are simple, primitive, or lack grammar
• Examples of stigmatized creoles include Haitian Creole, Jamaican Creole, and Hawaiʻi Creole English

Creoles as markers of identity

• Despite negative attitudes, creoles serve as important markers of identity for their speech communities
• Creole languages are often associated with cultural pride, resistance, and solidarity among their speakers
• The use of creoles in literature, music, and other cultural expressions helps to assert and celebrate creole identity
• Examples of creoles as markers of identity include the use of Papiamentu in Curaçaoan literature and the role of Kreyòl in Haitian national identity

Efforts to promote creole status

• Creole speakers and linguists have worked to challenge negative perceptions and promote the status of creole languages
• Efforts to promote creole status include standardization, the development of orthographies, and the creation of educational materials
• Advocacy for creole language rights and recognition has led to increased visibility and acceptance of creoles in some contexts
• Examples of efforts to promote creole status include the standardization of Seselwa in the Seychelles and the recognition of Papiamentu as an official language in Aruba, Bonaire, and Curaçao

Decreolization

• Decreolization refers to the process by which a creole language becomes more similar to its lexifier language over time
• This process is often driven by the social and economic pressures associated with the lexifier language's prestige and dominance
• Decreolization can lead to the emergence of a creole continuum, with varieties ranging from the basilectal (most creole-like) to the acrolectal (most lexifier-like)

Definition of decreolization

• Decreolization involves the gradual modification of a creole language to more closely resemble its lexifier language
• This process can occur at various linguistic levels, including phonology, morphology, syntax, and lexicon
• Decreolization is often characterized by the adoption of lexifier language features and the reduction of creole-specific structures

Factors leading to decreolization

• Social pressure to conform to the prestige lexifier language, particularly in formal contexts such as education and government
• Increased access to the lexifier language through media, education, and interaction with lexifier language speakers
• Stigmatization of the creole language and the desire for social mobility and economic opportunities associated with the lexifier language
• Examples of factors leading to decreolization include the influence of standard English on Jamaican Creole and the impact of standard French on Haitian Creole

Linguistic results of decreolization

• The emergence of a creole continuum, with varieties ranging from the most creole-like (basilect) to the most lexifier-like (acrolect)
• Increased use of lexifier language vocabulary, grammatical structures, and phonological features in the creole language
• Reduction or loss of creole-specific features, such as substrate-influenced structures or grammatical simplification
• Examples of linguistic results of decreolization include the use of English plural markers in Gullah and the adoption of French grammatical gender in some varieties of Louisiana Creole French

Creoles in education

• The use of creole languages in education has been a contentious issue, with debates centered on the role of creoles in the classroom and their impact on academic success
• Creole-speaking students often face challenges in educational systems that prioritize the lexifier language and stigmatize creole use
• Efforts to integrate creoles into education have included bilingual education models and the development of creole language curricula

Challenges of creole use in schools

• Creole-speaking students may face difficulties in schools that exclusively use the lexifier language as the medium of instruction
• Teachers may discourage or prohibit the use of creoles in the classroom, leading to linguistic insecurity and disengagement among creole-speaking students
• Limited availability of educational materials in creole languages can hinder the effective integration of creoles into the curriculum
• Examples of challenges of creole use in schools include the marginalization of Pidgin in Hawaiʻi's education system and the historical suppression of Creolese in Guyana's schools

Bilingual education models for creole speakers

• Bilingual education models seek to incorporate creole languages alongside the lexifier language in the classroom
• These models can include transitional bilingual education, where creoles are used as a bridge to the lexifier language, and maintenance bilingual education, which aims to develop proficiency in both languages
• Bilingual education programs can help validate creole languages, promote academic success, and foster positive cultural identity among creole-speaking students
• Examples of bilingual education models for creole speakers include the use of Kreyòl in Haitian classrooms and the incorporation of Papiamentu in Aruban schools

Creole language planning and policy

• Language planning and policy efforts aim to address the status and use of creole languages in education and other public domains
• These efforts can involve the standardization of creole orthography, the development of creole language curricula, and the training of teachers in creole language instruction
• Creole language planning and policy initiatives often face challenges related to resources, political will, and public attitudes towards creoles
• Examples of creole language planning and policy include the official recognition of Seselwa in the Seychelles and the development of Kreyòl-medium education in Haiti