11.2 Distributive Justice and Equality

Distributive justice tackles the fair allocation of society's benefits and burdens. It's a key concern in public policy, shaping how we distribute resources like income, wealth, and opportunities among individuals and groups.

Different theories of distributive justice offer frameworks for evaluating fairness and guiding policy. These include equality-based, equity-oriented, and need-based approaches, each with unique implications for how we structure our society and economy.

Distributive Justice and Public Policy

Concept and Relevance

Top images from around the web for Concept and Relevance

• 

  Learn More About RRI | Rights + Resources View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Call for Action to Address Equity and Justice Divide During COVID-19 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Perceptions of Distributive Justice in Latin America during a Period of Falling Inequality View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Learn More About RRI | Rights + Resources View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Call for Action to Address Equity and Justice Divide During COVID-19 View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

Top images from around the web for Concept and Relevance

• 

  Learn More About RRI | Rights + Resources View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Call for Action to Address Equity and Justice Divide During COVID-19 View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Perceptions of Distributive Justice in Latin America during a Period of Falling Inequality View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Learn More About RRI | Rights + Resources View original

  Is this image relevant?

• 

  Frontiers | Call for Action to Address Equity and Justice Divide During COVID-19 View original

  Is this image relevant?

1 of 3

• Distributive justice refers to the fair and equitable distribution of benefits and burdens in society, such as income, wealth, opportunities, and social goods
• Central concern of public policy shapes how resources and outcomes are allocated across individuals and groups in society
• Theories of distributive justice provide normative frameworks for evaluating the fairness of distributional outcomes and guiding policy choices to achieve just distributions
• Key dimensions of distributive justice include:
  • The what: what is being distributed (income, wealth, opportunities, social goods)
  • The how: the principles or criteria for distribution (equality, equity, need)
  • The who: the recipients of the distribution (individuals, groups, society as a whole)

Policy Implications

• Equality-based policies aim to reduce disparities and level the playing field (universal basic income, equal funding for public schools)
• Equity-oriented policies aim to reward individual effort and incentivize productive contributions to society (progressive taxation, pay-for-performance)
• Need-based distributive policies direct resources to the most disadvantaged (means-tested welfare benefits, need-based college financial aid)
• Libertarian policies minimize redistributive interventions in favor of free markets, private charity, and strong individual property rights
• Egalitarian policies constrain inequalities and prioritize improving the condition of the least advantaged (highly progressive taxation, worker ownership of firms)
• Desert-based policies in areas like wages, education, or the tax system aim to ensure rewards are commensurate with individual ability, effort, or societal contribution

Principles of Distributive Justice

Equality, Equity, and Need

• Equality as a distributive principle holds that benefits and burdens should be distributed equally among all members of society, regardless of individual differences or circumstances
• Equity as a distributive principle holds that outcomes should be distributed in proportion to individual inputs or contributions, such as effort, ability, or merit
• Need-based principles of distributive justice prioritize allocating resources to those with the greatest material or social needs to ensure a basic minimum standard of living

Libertarian, Egalitarian, and Desert-based Principles

• Libertarian theories emphasize just processes rather than just outcomes, holding that any distribution is just if it arises from voluntary exchanges between individuals (free markets)
• Egalitarian theories prioritize equality of outcomes, often allowing for inequalities only if they benefit the least well-off (Rawls' difference principle)
  • Example: Rawls argues that inequalities are just only if they are to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged members of society
• Desert-based theories argue that goods should be distributed to match individual desert or merit, based on criteria such as effort, ability, or social contribution
  • Example: A desert-based approach to wages would hold that pay should be commensurate with an individual's skills, effort, and contribution to the organization or society

Policy Implications of Distributive Justice

Equality and Equity-based Policies

• Universal policies provide benefits to all members of society equally, regardless of individual circumstances (universal healthcare, universal basic income)
• Targeted equity-based policies aim to level the playing field by providing additional resources to disadvantaged groups (affirmative action, progressive taxation)
• Policies that equalize starting points or opportunities, such as equal funding for education, aim to ensure fair competition and meritocratic outcomes

Need and Desert-based Policies

• Means-tested programs, such as welfare benefits or Medicaid, target aid to those below a certain income or need threshold
• Workfare programs condition public assistance benefits on fulfilling certain work requirements, reflecting both need and desert considerations
• Performance-based pay structures in organizations aim to reward individual merit and contributions
• Tax deductions or credits for charitable giving incentivize voluntary contributions to meet social needs

Trade-offs in Distributive Justice

Equality vs. Efficiency

• Policies that prioritize equality, such as high tax rates or wealth redistribution, may reduce incentives for productive economic activity and lower overall social welfare
• Okun's "leaky bucket" analogy: Redistribution to achieve equality entails losses in efficiency, like transferring water in a leaky bucket

Targeting vs. Universality

• Precisely targeting aid to the neediest can ensure efficient use of resources, but may stigmatize recipients and undermine universal social solidarity
• Universal programs, while less targeted, can generate broader public support and social cohesion (Social Security, public education)

Unintended Consequences and Incentives

• Redistributive policies may create perverse incentives, such as discouraging work or encouraging family breakdown
  • Example: High marginal tax rates on earned income may discourage labor force participation
  • Example: Means-tested benefits that penalize asset accumulation may discourage saving and wealth-building
• Well-intentioned policies to promote equality or need-based aid may inadvertently trap beneficiaries in cycles of dependence

Measurement and Implementation Challenges

• Difficulties quantifying complex distributive concepts like need, desert, or equality of opportunity pose implementation challenges
  • Example: Measuring "need" based on income alone may not capture important non-monetary dimensions of well-being and deprivation
• Equality of opportunity requires complex assessments of individual circumstances and structural barriers that complicate policy design
• Debates over what criteria should determine "desert" (effort, ability, social value) complicate the application of desert principles in policy